This is Who We Pay to Protect Us?

[cawacko]

So according to Zaxby's, this occurred during lunch rush, but NO ONE else can confirm hearing the insults?

Mighty strange.

Where did the restaurant say anything about this occurring during the lunch rush? All that it says is they went in for lunch on a Sunday.

 

[Seahawk]

Where did the restaurant say anything about this occurring during the lunch rush? All that it says is they went in for lunch on a Sunday.

Zappa will tell you that you have to prove his claim wrong.

 

[zappasguitar]

Zap, what did the officer say that was inconsistent that made you question why he was hired?

Where did I question why the officer was hired?

I merely question his version of events at Zaxbys.

 

[Seahawk]

So according to Zaxby's, this occurred during lunch rush, but NO ONE else can confirm hearing the insults?

Mighty strange.

Lie.

 

[Seahawk]

And why is the wife the one talking to reporters?

NOTHING I have read indicates she was there with her husband and his partner when the "events" went down.

Lie.

 

[zappasguitar]

Be fair. You're the one who said it couldn't have happened without witnesses because it happened during the "lunch rush."

No one need make any gigantic leaps of logic to think there were almost certainly other customers in the restaurant if the incident did occur during the lunch rush?

That YurtHawk simply refuses to acknowledge such a common sense conclusion astounds me.

 

[Seahawk]

The cop's OWN WORDS!

Can you REALLY be this dim?

Oh wait...my mistake.

I forgot who I was talking to for a second.

Lie.

 

[Seahawk]

CLEVELAND COUNTY, NC (WBTV) -

Deputies in Cleveland County were taunted by employees and served tampered food at a fast food restaurant while taking a lunch break in their uniforms, according law enforcement sources.

http://www.wbtv.com/story/32419066/...red-food-at-fast-food-restaurant?sf30741761=1

Is a lunch break always lunch rush?

 

[cawacko]

Where did I question why the officer was hired?

I merely question his version of events at Zaxbys.

Your subject line says "This is who we pay to protect us?"

Sounds like your questioning them to me.

 

[Seahawk]

And of course, now that he's been embarrassed yet again, Yurt is going to spend the next few pages quibbling about where the facts came from.

Another Butthurt Yurt hallmark!

He knows my points are valid, but he's not man enough to admit as much, so he plays his infantile games...

Zappa says from "the cops OWN WORDS" then whines about me saying that is not true and I'm quibbling about where the facts come from.

Seriously, I cannot make this shit up.

 

[zappasguitar]

No I am not. I'm merely stating that their lunch time may not be during the normal lunch rush.

Which you have yet to concede is true. Why can't you admit it is possible you are wrong and that this didn't occur during lunch rush, AND on a SUNDAY, which is not considered to have lunch rush?

I see you avoided the wager, chicken.

No lunch rush on a Sunday?

You've obviously never tried to go have lunch out after church.

 

[Seahawk]

No one need make any gigantic leaps of logic to think there were almost certainly other customers in the restaurant if the incident did occur during the lunch rush?

That YurtHawk simply refuses to acknowledge such a common sense conclusion astounds me.

LMFAO at the backpeddling.

I can't make this stuff up.

 

[zappasguitar]

Zappa will tell you that you have to prove his claim wrong.

No I won't.

That is just another one of the numerous bullshit diversions you've tossed out to avoid admitting I am right.

 

[zappasguitar]

Is a lunch break always lunch rush?

For the VAST majority of Americans, yes it is.

You just refuse to acknowledge this point because you can't stand the possibility I am right.

 

[Seahawk]

No lunch rush on a Sunday?

You've obviously never tried to go have lunch out after church.

There is no lunch rush hour on Sunday. You say otherwise, prove me wrong.

 

[Seahawk]

For the VAST majority of Americans, yes it is.

You just refuse to acknowledge this point because you can't stand the possibility I am right.

No I didn't, stop lying. Cite where I refused to acknowledge that. When you don't, that will be simply another lie you told.

 

[zappasguitar]

Your subject line says "This is who we pay to protect us?"

Sounds like your questioning them to me.

Nope...sorry.

You are mistaken.

 

[Seahawk]

No I won't.

That is just another one of the numerous bullshit diversions you've tossed out to avoid admitting I am right.

You already did.

Wrong, as usual.

Common sense states the generally recognized time for "lunch" is around "midday".

If Taft wants to claim the officers ate their "lunch" at a time other than the generally recognized time, it's up to him to corroborate his claim.

Also, I never claimed "everyone" takes their lunch between 12-1...that is another LIE spread by you.

Liar.

 

[zappasguitar]

LMFAO at the backpeddling.

I can't make this stuff up.

But you ARE making "this stuff" up.

Nonsensical diversions so you won't have to acknowledge the truth of my statements.

But that's always been how Yurt responded when he lost a debate...now you're doing it too.

Color me shocked.

 

[Seahawk]

Your subject line says "This is who we pay to protect us?"

Sounds like your questioning them to me.

Nope...sorry.

You are mistaken.

Really?

No, that post implies I am questioning the police version of events at the restaurant.