This is Who We Pay to Protect Us?

Seahawk said:
No I didn't, stop lying. Cite where I refused to acknowledge that. When you don't, that will be simply another lie you told.
Click to expand...

Hell, you had ANOTHER chance to acknowledge the point right there^^^^and you skipped right over it.

Yurt's getting more and more desperate all the time!

ROFL!
 
ZappasGuitar said:
But you ARE making "this stuff" up.

Nonsensical diversions so you won't have to acknowledge the truth of my statements.

But that's always been how Yurt responded when he lost a debate...now you're doing it too.

Color me shocked.
Click to expand...

Did you use the word "if" before? If so I will recant.

But you never used that word before, did you, so you are in fact backpeddling.

Liar.
 
ZappasGuitar said:
Hell, you had ANOTHER chance to acknowledge the point right there^^^^and you skipped right over it.

Yurt's getting more and more desperate all the time!

ROFL!
Click to expand...

"No I didn't". That means I agree that the VAST majority have lunch during the lunch rush.

Now, can you PROVE the officers had lunch during lunch rush?
 
ZappasGuitar said:
That a man we pay to "serve and protect" us, allowed his wife to compare getting the wrong wing sauce on his lunch to being SHOT AT.
Click to expand...

Wrong hot sauce? I think it's quite clearly more than that. She said her husband gets disrespected at his dangerous job and then was disrespected at the restaurant. She's pretty clearly speaking about a pattern of behavior towards officers.

I don't see what is so offensive about that
 
Seahawk said:
"No I didn't". That means I agree that the VAST majority have lunch during the lunch rush.

Now, can you PROVE the officers had lunch during lunch rush?
Click to expand...

Can you prove they took lunch at a time OTHER than the typical hours lunch is served?

No?

Then we can agree that since the VAST MAJORITY take lunch during the "lunch rush", it is FAR MORE LIKELY they ate lunch during ordinary "lunch hours".
 
cawacko said:
What does the time they ate have anything to do with this story? How is it even relevent?
Click to expand...

Because the likelihood of other customers being in the restaurant and thus able to hear any "taunts" the officers endured is greater during the peak of the lunch rush as opposed to, say, 5 minutes before closing time.
 
ZappasGuitar said:
Because the likelihood of other customers being in the restaurant and thus able to hear any "taunts" the officers endured is greater during the peak of the lunch rush as opposed to, say, 5 minutes before closing time.
Click to expand...

I guess I'm not understanding what would change about this story if other people were there.
 
cawacko said:
Wrong hot sauce? I think it's quite clearly more than that. She said her husband gets disrespected at his dangerous job and then was disrespected at the restaurant. She's pretty clearly speaking about a pattern of behavior towards officers.

I don't see what is so offensive about that
Click to expand...

I don't think it's more than that.

Ultimately that is what was wrong with their food.

The cooks put the wrong wing sauce on their orders.

Then one of the wives decides to ramp up the hyperbole to ludicrous levels and compare getting the wrong wing sauce with being shot at while on the job.
 
ZappasGuitar said:
I don't think it's more than that.

Ultimately that is what was wrong with their food.

The cooks put the wrong wing sauce on their orders.

Then one of the wives decides to ramp up the hyperbole to ludicrous levels and compare getting the wrong wing sauce with being shot at while on the job.
Click to expand...

I again, read YOUR OP and didn't see those words.

Where did you get that from?
 
cawacko said:
I guess I'm not understanding what would change about this story if other people were there.
Click to expand...

To taunt someone out in front of the cash registers from the kitchen of any fast food restaurant would require the cook to be quite LOUD and would have been easily heard by other customers.


Yet to this day, not a single person in that town has come forward to corroborate the cop's story.
 
ZappasGuitar said:
I don't think it's more than that.

Ultimately that is what was wrong with their food.

The cooks put the wrong wing sauce on their orders.

Then one of the wives decides to ramp up the hyperbole to ludicrous levels and compare getting the wrong wing sauce with being shot at while on the job.
Click to expand...

You're not telling the whole story and I think you know that. It's pretty clear this wasn't an accidental mishap. When the workers are taunting the officers then purposefully mess up their order by putting a very hot sauce on that's not an honest mistake.

That is the disrespect the wife is speaking about.
 
Seahawk said:
I again, read YOUR OP and didn't see those words.

Where did you get that from?
Click to expand...

"“Years ago, this profession was respected, it was honored,” Shores said. “Now to get ridiculed, to be a target, to possibly get shot at, for little pay. What’s the motivation to be a police officer other than do it because your heart’s in it to help the community?"

She's comparing the officers getting the wrong wing sauce to being shot at.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top