This is Who We Pay to Protect Us?

cawacko said:
Of all the topics to discuss on a political board I'm still struggling to understand how you came up with one about two cops who go to lunch, get yelled at by the workers while getting their food f'd with and your conclusion seems to be the cops are at fault here.

If the goal is to be anti-cop aren't there a lot better stories out there than this?
Click to expand...

I wanted nothing more than point out the inconsistencies in the Officer's story.

It wasn't until you and ButtHurt Yurt started whining about unimportant details in a desperate attempt to catch me in some kind of "gotcha" trap that this thread got out of hand.

But, as is the case with the vast majority of JPP Righties, honest discussion isn't as important to you as humiliating the liberal.
 
ZappasGuitar said:
I wanted nothing more than point out the inconsistencies in the Officer's story.

It wasn't until you and ButtHurt Yurt started whining about unimportant details in a desperate attempt to catch me in some kind of "gotcha" trap that this thread got out of hand.

But, as is the case with the vast majority of JPP Righties, honest discussion isn't as important to you as humiliating the liberal.
Click to expand...

And what was the inconsistency in his story?
 
ZappasGuitar said:
Wrong, as usual.

Common sense states the generally recognized time for "lunch" is around "midday".

If Taft wants to claim the officers ate their "lunch" at a time other than the generally recognized time, it's up to him to corroborate his claim.

Also, I never claimed "everyone" takes their lunch between 12-1...that is another LIE spread by you.
Click to expand...
Only you could call that assumption commonsense. If your shift is from noon to 9 your lunch hour is not during midday.

Sent from my LG-D631 using Tapatalk
 
ZappasGuitar said:
Wrong, as usual.

Common sense states the generally recognized time for "lunch" is around "midday".

If Taft wants to claim the officers ate their "lunch" at a time other than the generally recognized time, it's up to him to corroborate his claim.

Also, I never claimed "everyone" takes their lunch between 12-1...that is another LIE spread by you.
Click to expand...
You are the only one to claim it was during lunch rush, and you must prove that.

Sent from my LG-D631 using Tapatalk
 
ZappasGuitar said:
I wanted nothing more than point out the inconsistencies in the Officer's story.

It wasn't until you and ButtHurt Yurt started whining about unimportant details in a desperate attempt to catch me in some kind of "gotcha" trap that this thread got out of hand.

But, as is the case with the vast majority of JPP Righties, honest discussion isn't as important to you as humiliating the liberal.
Click to expand...
What inconsistencies?

Why do you whine every time some proves you wrong or questions your statements?

Sent from my LG-D631 using Tapatalk
 
Seahawk said:
This is Who We Pay to Protect Us?

What do you mean by your thread title? Are you belittling or mocking the police here?
Click to expand...

Of course. Liberals all hate police and military. They represent and fight for the evil country they hate with a passion. IE the US.
 
Seahawk said:
Only you could call that assumption commonsense. If your shift is from noon to 9 your lunch hour is not during midday.

Sent from my LG-D631 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Then all you've got to do is prove the officers worked second or third shift and voila!

You'd be right...for once.

Go ask the average American when Americans eat lunch and the OVERWHELMING MAJORITY are going to say somewhere around noon.
 
ZappasGuitar said:
Then all you've got to do is prove the officers worked second or third shift and voila!

You'd be right...for once.

Go ask the average American when Americans eat lunch and the OVERWHELMING MAJORITY are going to say somewhere around noon.
Click to expand...
So you don't have to prove your claim I see.

Sent from my LG-D631 using Tapatalk
 
Seahawk said:
So you don't have to prove your claim I see.

Sent from my LG-D631 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

And that's how he operates.
Him and other liberals will make a claim, provide nothing to substantiate their claim, and then demand that you prove that their claim is in error; because you have dared to challenge their preconceptions.
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
And that's how he operates.
Him and other liberals will make a claim, provide nothing to substantiate their claim, and then demand that you prove that their claim is in error; because you have dared to challenge their preconceptions.
Click to expand...

On this board, I've only seen him do it, more than once. In fact, it seem like everytime I question a claim he makes, he either says I'm playing gotcha games or that I have to prove him wrong.

I'm come across a few people like that online and IRL, and online they are called trolls.
 
ZappasGuitar said:
I understand.

It must be horribly frustrating for you to get schooled by me so often.
Click to expand...

Not proving your claim is schooling me. That is a new one. I bet 1 thousand dollars you will not hold yourself in the future to the same standard and 1 trillion dollars that in the past you have not held yourself to the same standard.

Care to wager, we can use paypal.
 
Seahawk said:
Not proving your claim is schooling me. That is a new one. I bet 1 thousand dollars you will not hold yourself in the future to the same standard and 1 trillion dollars that in the past you have not held yourself to the same standard.

Care to wager, we can use paypal.
Click to expand...

OMG are you STILL whining about what time "lunch" is for the vast majority of Americans?

ROTFLMBFWAO!!

The desperate lengths you will go to.
 
ZappasGuitar said:
OMG are you STILL whining about what time "lunch" is for the vast majority of Americans?

ROTFLMBFWAO!!

The desperate lengths you will go to.
Click to expand...

Be fair. You're the one who said it couldn't have happened without witnesses because it happened during the "lunch rush."
 
ZappasGuitar said:
OMG are you STILL whining about what time "lunch" is for the vast majority of Americans?

ROTFLMBFWAO!!

The desperate lengths you will go to.
Click to expand...

No I am not. I'm merely stating that their lunch time may not be during the normal lunch rush.

Which you have yet to concede is true. Why can't you admit it is possible you are wrong and that this didn't occur during lunch rush, AND on a SUNDAY, which is not considered to have lunch rush?

I see you avoided the wager, chicken.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top