Trumpster Fire

USFREEDOM911 said:
There we go.
That's the 3D we've all come to love and adore.

You know; the one who just hates being proven to be in error.
Especially when he just wants to sweep it under the rug.

HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA



And now, in an attempt to bolster your point, you have gone full blown liberal and made the decision to rewrite words!! :palm:

You haven't proven that Trump is a racist, except to FEEL that he is; so there's no need for me to prove you're in error, seeing as how you are and it's you who is acting childish by refusing to admit that you are in error.
It was nice to see how quickly Rune, Legion, and Leon aligned themselves with you; because it places you in such good company and you should be proud. :D
Click to expand...

I am a deal maker, so cry harder.

There is nothing subjective about Douchebag Donald's comments. Millions have witnessed him saying them, and so the reality of his words is settled.

He did not "sort of" say that Curiel cannot be impartial, and he did not "possibly" say that it's owing to the man being Mexican. DD stated it outright and overtly. This may be news to you, but DD is a "straight-shooter," who "tells it like it is," and is not PC.

To put it in terms that a Trumptard can't understand, 1 + 1 = 2
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
There we go.
That's the 3D we've all come to love and adore.

You know; the one who just hates being proven to be in error.
Especially when he just wants to sweep it under the rug.

HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA



And now, in an attempt to bolster your point, you have gone full blown liberal and made the decision to rewrite words!! :palm:

You haven't proven that Trump is a racist, except to FEEL that he is; so there's no need for me to prove you're in error, seeing as how you are and it's you who is acting childish by refusing to admit that you are in error.
It was nice to see how quickly Rune, Legion, and Leon aligned themselves with you; because it places you in such good company and you should be proud. :D
Click to expand...

This little policially correct Tempest in a Tea Pot can be distilled into this: what Trump said can be construed as racist---and it helps greatly to ignore the context lol. And it was a hellaciously stupid thing to say in a presidential campaign. Basically, Trump thinks the judge is biased against him---because---as a Mexican---the judge may not care for his policies. It's no different than if the judge were a coal miner and Trump had promised to shut down coal mines. Trump would essentially being accusing him of political bias and not making some comment about coal miners being inherently incapable of being judges.

It's not nearly as damning as Joe Biden calling Obama 'an articulate black man'; a comment about blacks that exudes racism out of every orifice. But that was 'just Joe being Joe' and the liberals didnt get their panties in a wad over it.

So you can take their caterwauling with a grain of salt.
 
Establishment said:
I am a deal maker, so cry harder.

There is nothing subjective about Douchebag Donald's comments. Millions have witnessed him saying them, and so the reality of his words is settled.

He did not "sort of" say that Curiel cannot be impartial, and he did not "possibly" say that it's owing to the man being Mexican. DD stated it outright and overtly. This may be news to you, but DD is a "straight-shooter," who "tells it like it is," and is not PC.

To put it in terms that a Trumptard can't understand, 1 + 1 = 2
Click to expand...

Try as hard as you want; because you're wrong on the racist label and always will be, as long as you try to continue to rewrite definitions. :D
 
Darth Hussein Omar said:
This little policially correct Tempest in a Tea Pot can be distilled into this: what Trump said can be construed as racist---and it helps greatly to ignore the context lol. And it was a hellaciously stupid thing to say in a presidential campaign. Basically, Trump thinks the judge is biased against him---because---as a Mexican---the judge may not care for his policies. It's no different than if the judge were a coal miner and Trump had promised to shut down coal mines. Trump would essentially being accusing him of political bias and not making some comment about coal miners being inherently incapable of being judges.

It's not nearly as damning as Joe Biden calling Obama 'an articulate black man'; a comment about blacks that exudes racism out of every orifice. But that was 'just Joe being Joe' and the liberals didnt get their panties in a wad over it.

So you can take their caterwauling with a grain of salt.
Click to expand...

Hispanics / Mexicans and Islamist, are not races.
Period
End of story, except for liberals who can't accept that they're wrong. :D
 
Darth Hussein Omar said:
This little policially correct Tempest in a Tea Pot can be distilled into this: what Trump said can be construed as racist---and it helps greatly to ignore the context lol. And it was a hellaciously stupid thing to say in a presidential campaign. Basically, Trump thinks the judge is biased against him---because---as a Mexican---the judge may not care for his policies. It's no different than if the judge were a coal miner and Trump had promised to shut down coal mines. Trump would essentially being accusing him of political bias and not making some comment about coal miners being inherently incapable of being judges.

It's not nearly as damning as Joe Biden calling Obama 'an articulate black man'; a comment about blacks that exudes racism out of every orifice. But that was 'just Joe being Joe' and the liberals didnt get their panties in a wad over it.

So you can take their caterwauling with a grain of salt.
Click to expand...

Except the Donald said the judge is biased because he is Mexican.
The statement is as racist as his earlier comment about Mexicans; "somebody's doing thr raping".
Youfucking racist appologist idiot.
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
Hispanics / Mexicans and Islamist, are not races.
Period
End of story, except for liberals who can't accept that they're wrong. :D
Click to expand...

Oh, for goodness' sake. Even Paul Ryan - well known liberal - used the word "racist."

The word is often used beyond the narrow/literal interpretation to convey prejudice. It's not complicated.
 
Rune said:
Except the Donald said the judge is biased because he is Mexican.
The statement is as racist as his earlier comment about Mexicans; "somebody's doing thr raping".
Youfucking racist appologist idiot.
Click to expand...

Well, duh lol.

Because he's Mexican, it's conceivable he would disagree with Trump's immigration policy. I don't know if the judge is biased or not---Trump doesn't know he's biased or not. But accusing someone of political bias isn't racism no matter how hard you try and make it so.

Idiot racialist hack.
 
Last edited:
Thing1 said:
Oh, for goodness' sake. Even Paul Ryan - well known liberal - used the word "racist."

The word is often used beyond the narrow/literal interpretation to convey prejudice. It's not complicated.
Click to expand...

Oh please, the word is abused to death and it's done nothing but create devisiveness.

Ryan and his weak-kneed cohorts are part of the problem. Somebody needs to stand up to this crap.
 
Darth Hussein Omar said:
Well, duh lol.

Because he's Mexican, it's conceivable he would disagree with Trump's immigration policy. I don't know if the judge is biased or not---Trump doesn't know he's biased or not. But accusing someone of political bias isn't racism no matter how hard you try and make it so.

Idiot racialist hack.
Click to expand...

Accusing someone of bias, based simply on their ethnic origin is racist. Its racist to make assumptions about someone based solely on ethnicity.
 
"That guy on the corner dressed in rags is poor"..... not racism, you are basing your assumption on his state of dress.
"That guy over there is an unfair judge, I know because he is Mexican. (especially when he is not a Mexican citizen)"..... racist because you are basing your assumption on his ethnicity.
 
Darth Hussein Omar said:
Oh please, the word is abused to death and it's done nothing but create devisiveness.

Ryan and his weak-kneed cohorts are part of the problem. Somebody needs to stand up to this crap.
Click to expand...

It's the same thing. It's prejudice.

No one is "abusing" it in this case. This isn't race-baiting, and it isn't a "politically correct" issue. Trump said the guy can't do his job because "he's a Mexican," even though he was born in Indiana.

Only the most hardcore Trump apologists think this is nothing. MANY Republicans have spoken out against it. You have to be 100% all in on Trump to think this isn't prejudice (especially when combined w/ his now-vast history of comments on "other" ethnicities, religions, races & genders).
 
Jarod said:
Accusing someone of bias, based simply on their ethnic origin is racist. Its racist to make assumptions about someone based solely on ethnicity.
Click to expand...

It only stands as racism [to whatever extent 'Mexican' is even a race...USF has a point] if there's no other extenuating circumstances; in other words, if there was no political dynamic at work and Trump said 'because he's Mexican' then you would have a point.

But there's the Wall and Trumps calling for deportation of illegal immigrants---which includes Mexicans. The judge is of Mexican descent---so---the possibility exists that he could be biased against Trump in his rulings. Trump was stupid for saying what he said, but the charge isn't without some merit.

It would be IDENTICAL to a judge from WV, with coal ties, presiding over a case involving Hillary as a plaintiff. If Hillary would say 'because he's a West Virginian' no one would bat an eye. In fact, liberals would be calling for the judge to recuse himself.

And they know it.
 
Darth Hussein Omar said:
It only stands as racism [to whatever extent 'Mexican' is even a race...USF has a point] if there's no other extenuating circumstances; in other words, if there was no political dynamic at work and Trump said 'because he's Mexican' then you would have a point.

But there's the Wall and Trumps calling for deportation of illegal immigrants---which includes Mexicans. The judge is of Mexican descent---so---the possibility exists that he could be biased against Trump in his rulings. Trump was stupid for saying what he said, but the charge isn't without some merit.

It would be IDENTICAL to a judge from WV, with coal ties, presiding over a case involving Hillary as a plaintiff. If Hillary would say 'because he's a West Virginian' no one would bat an eye. In fact, liberals would be calling for the judge to recuse himself.

And they know it.
Click to expand...

IT would not be identical because the guy would really be West Virginian... The Judge in the Trump case is not really Mexican, he from Indiana. Because Trump knew that the Judge was not a Mexican, as in his nationality was not Mexican, what else could trump have meant, other than that the judge was "Hispanic". Additionally if you watch the video, not how Trump pronounces the guys first name.... GonZAAALLLOOO (Gonzalo). The assumption that anyone with Hispanic heritage must be biased against Trump because of his "wall" proposal, is racist!
 
"Racism and racial discrimination are often used to describe discrimination on an ethnic or cultural basis, independent of whether these differences are described as racial. According to a United Nations convention, there is no distinction between the terms "racial" and "ethnic" discrimination"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racism
 
Darth Hussein Omar said:
It only stands as racism [to whatever extent 'Mexican' is even a race...USF has a point] if there's no other extenuating circumstances; in other words, if there was no political dynamic at work and Trump said 'because he's Mexican' then you would have a point.

But there's the Wall and Trumps calling for deportation of illegal immigrants---which includes Mexicans. The judge is of Mexican descent---so---the possibility exists that he could be biased against Trump in his rulings. Trump was stupid for saying what he said, but the charge isn't without some merit.

It would be IDENTICAL to a judge from WV, with coal ties, presiding over a case involving Hillary as a plaintiff. If Hillary would say 'because he's a West Virginian' no one would bat an eye. In fact, liberals would be calling for the judge to recuse himself.

And they know it.
Click to expand...

There are about a gazillion people who would bat an eyelash if Hillary made the same fuss about a judge from WV. No liberal would call for recusal.

What an insane stretch that is. It would be ridiculous if she did that - and she wouldn't. Using the idiocy of you & Trump, you could find literally anything about a judge's background that would be a "conflict."
 
Jarod said:
IT would not be identical because the guy would really be West Virginian... The Judge in the Trump case is not really Mexican, he from Indiana. Because Trump knew that the Judge was not a Mexican, as in his nationality was not Mexican, what else could trump have meant, other than that the judge was "Hispanic". Additionally if you watch the video, not how Trump pronounces the guys first name.... GonZAAALLLOOO (Gonzalo). The assumption that anyone with Hispanic heritage must be biased against Trump because of his "wall" proposal, is racist!
Click to expand...

Nice try, but Trump is several things in this little dust up: idiot? Check. Misinformed? Check.

Racist, even in some technical sense of the word? No.
 
Darth Hussein Omar said:
Well, duh lol.

Because he's Mexican, it's conceivable he would disagree with Trump's immigration policy. I don't know if the judge is biased or not---Trump doesn't know he's biased or not. But accusing someone of political bias isn't racism no matter how hard you try and make it so.

Idiot racialist hack.
Click to expand...

It is when one says that they are biased BECAUSE they are Mexican you drooling toilet brush.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top