Trumpster Fire

Nice try, but Trump is several things in this little dust up: idiot? Check. Misinformed? Check.

Racist, even in some technical sense of the word? No.

I disagree, and I hope The Orange One shares your opinion that it is a "Little dust up" but his actions indicate differently, he has finally stopped talking about it and is not only giving teleprompter speeches.
 
Except the Donald said the judge is biased because he is Mexican.
The statement is as racist as his earlier comment about Mexicans; "somebody's doing thr raping".
Youfucking racist appologist idiot.

Rune, you ignorant slut.

Mexican's are not a race. :palm:
 
Oh, for goodness' sake. Even Paul Ryan - well known liberal - used the word "racist."

The word is often used beyond the narrow/literal interpretation to convey prejudice. It's not complicated.

AND??

Or are you trying to say that liberals are just followers of others and then apologists for their collective stupidity?
 
"That guy on the corner dressed in rags is poor"..... not racism, you are basing your assumption on his state of dress.
"That guy over there is an unfair judge, I know because he is Mexican. (especially when he is not a Mexican citizen)"..... racist because you are basing your assumption on his ethnicity.

Now you're just trying to rewrite definitions, as liberals are so wont to do, in an effort to cover liberal ass; but no matter how many times you repeat the lie, it doesn't make it the truth.
 
IT would not be identical because the guy would really be West Virginian... The Judge in the Trump case is not really Mexican, he from Indiana. Because Trump knew that the Judge was not a Mexican, as in his nationality was not Mexican, what else could trump have meant, other than that the judge was "Hispanic". Additionally if you watch the video, not how Trump pronounces the guys first name.... GonZAAALLLOOO (Gonzalo). The assumption that anyone with Hispanic heritage must be biased against Trump because of his "wall" proposal, is racist!

It's not racist.
 
Untrue; because you're trying to change the meaning and promote it as fact.
It's not racism.

I'm not changing anything. It's common usage. Do you understand how the language works?

""Racism and racial discrimination are often used to describe discrimination on an ethnic or cultural basis, independent of whether these differences are described as racial. According to a United Nations convention, there is no distinction between the terms "racial" and "ethnic" discrimination"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racism"
 
I'm not changing anything. It's common usage. Do you understand how the language works?

""Racism and racial discrimination are often used to describe discrimination on an ethnic or cultural basis, independent of whether these differences are described as racial. According to a United Nations convention, there is no distinction between the terms "racial" and "ethnic" discrimination"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racism"

Is that the same Wikipedia that liberals discount, when they disagree with what it says??

It's not racism.
 
Is that the same Wikipedia that liberals discount, when they disagree with what it says??

It's not racism.

I don't know. I never discount it.

Sorry if the facts of the matter upset your POV. There are a lot of other sources for that, as well. Racism has come to be used in a much more pervasive matter on issues of prejudice. Even if you don't accept that, the basic ignorance at its foundation is exactly the same.
 
Back
Top