Benghazi? No...Ben Dover

Rush is on a lot of FM stations too.... you pretty much own talk radio, regardless of the frequency spectrum....

but you still think the left has the advantage?

LMAO; and yet, with all the OTHER outlets, dumbass leftists like you still whine, piss and moan about Fox and Rush Limbaugh.

Dunce.
 
I can't figure out what I posted that has you so confused about what I've said...
Yeah, if I was of the liberal persuasion, I'd be crowing about liberal dominance of the media....your word, so I assume you know what 'dominance' means....I'll remind
what it doesn't mean....it doesn't mean TOTAL....

the liberal side may dominate in the media, but they don't own it ALL...thats pretty simple, is it not...

I used to use a very simple test to gage the spin of newspapers years ago....

Lets say a politician does some dirty deed and the paper reports it.....if its a Democrat politician, they would report the deed, print his name, etc....but what they also did was bury his political affiliation deep in the article.....or not reveal it at all......you'd have to search for it.

If it was a Republican, that fact would be printed in the first line of the story or in the headline....a subtle but effective tactic back then...

Always remember; you are debating with a dishonest dunce who is painfully stupid and a mindless parrot for the DNC.
 
And Hannity is another...

And Beck is another...

And Savage is another...

And Levin is another...

And Prager is another...

And Gallagher is another...

And Medved is another...

And Boortz is another...

Another leftist dunce who cannot distinguish the difference between "news reporting" and "talk shows."

Yes Zappas; you really are that painfully stupid.

Dunce.
 
Zap names people, this idiot combines people, the names of programs and the stations they broadcast on. If Zap did the same, his list would be REALLY long.

Nova is one fucking idiot.

Irony; a retarded idiot claiming others are idiots. You leftists are beyond mere stupid.

Moron.
 
The conservative argument seems to be as follows: Fox News isn't biased, Fox News isn't biased, Fox News isn't biased, with an eventual okay, Fox News has a conservative bias. But it's not as bad as MSNBC.

Do I have that right? (no pun intended)
 
The point is you tried to be disingenuous with your "Rush is one program...ONE" nonsense.

Tell you what, you go find and add together the average weekly listeners for Rush, Glen and Sean. Then compare that number with how many listeners that ENTIRE LIST of Liberal talkers has, and let's see which number is bigger.

Want to guess which group is going to have more listeners?

There's a reason no one listens to leftist talk shows; because they are boring and glaring in their repugnant stupidity. LMAO

Even Liberals get bored by their own glaring nonsense.
 
The conservative argument seems to be as follows: Fox News isn't biased, Fox News isn't biased, Fox News isn't biased, with an eventual okay, Fox News has a conservative bias. But it's not as bad as MSNBC.

Do I have that right? (no pun intended)

No; you seldom get anything right Dunce. What you constantly hear from the twits on the left is their incessant whining and cacophony about Fox and Rush right wing bias as if it were a problem; but seldom do they whine about the bias on networks they glom onto like gullible dimwits. It's called hypocrisy and irony.

What is being pointed out is that even with ALL the choices Americans seem to have to get their news and talk shows, they prefer it from Fox and Rush; why do you think that is? Assuming of course you can think or have a coherent and unbiased thought.
 
No; you seldom get anything right Dunce. What you constantly hear from the twits on the left is their incessant whining and cacophony about Fox and Rush right wing bias as if it were a problem; but seldom do they whine about the bias on networks they glom onto like gullible dimwits. It's called hypocrisy and irony.

What is being pointed out is that even with ALL the choices Americans seem to have to get their news and talk shows, they prefer it from Fox and Rush; why do you think that is? Assuming of course you can think or have a coherent and unbiased thought.

They are among the few conservative choices in the media. So, there is only one Fox, but there is an NBC, CBS, ABC, MSNBC, etc. Combine the ratings of the latter and they probably match Fox.

Doesn't change that Fox isn't "balanced" or truthful. They're a campaign arm of the GOP, essentially. Sorry that bothers you.
 
No; you seldom get anything right Dunce. What you constantly hear from the twits on the left is their incessant whining and cacophony about Fox and Rush right wing bias as if it were a problem; but seldom do they whine about the bias on networks they glom onto like gullible dimwits. It's called hypocrisy and irony.

What is being pointed out is that even with ALL the choices Americans seem to have to get their news and talk shows, they prefer it from Fox and Rush; why do you think that is? Assuming of course you can think or have a coherent and unbiased thought.

you think Fox news out draws network (non-cable) news?

If you do... and if you think that will ALL their choices, Americans prefer to turn to Fox and Rush, then why are you always bitching about a liberal bias in the MSM if FOX is getting all the viewers anyway?
 
And the repeated use of "dunce" does nothing to bolster your arguments. Like all buzz words, it loses meaning & impact w/ repetition.

It is the refuge of the fool.
 
so the left still has the advantage even with the powerful juggernaut that is AM radio and Faux News?

First, maineman comments on the AM radio juggernaut.

LMAO; you really are incredibly stupid.

Then it typical Defective Truth fashion you...well everyone already knows how you respond to everything.

There's a reason no one listens to leftist talk shows; because they are boring and glaring in their repugnant stupidity. LMAO

Even Liberals get bored by their own glaring nonsense.

And yet here you are agreeing with me that there is indeed an AM radio juggernaut.

I understand that once you read this you will respond as usual and deny that is what you meant, but anyone with a little common sense can see otherwise.

Thanks for playing...ROTFLMAO!
 
They are among the few conservative choices in the media. So, there is only one Fox, but there is an NBC, CBS, ABC, MSNBC, etc. Combine the ratings of the latter and they probably match Fox.

Doesn't change that Fox isn't "balanced" or truthful. They're a campaign arm of the GOP, essentially. Sorry that bothers you.

It doesn't bother me the least; but it turns Liberals into whiney dunces. So let's presume that Fox is a campaign arm for the GOP, does that mean you are okay with LA Times, Washington Post, New York Times, MSNBC, CBS, ABC, CNN and NBC being campaign arms of the DNC?
 
First, maineman comments on the AM radio juggernaut.

Then it typical Defective Truth fashion you...well everyone already knows how you respond to everything.

And yet here you are agreeing with me that there is indeed an AM radio juggernaut.

I understand that once you read this you will respond as usual and deny that is what you meant, but anyone with a little common sense can see otherwise.

Thanks for playing...ROTFLMAO!

LMAO; you really are a dimwitted simpleton of extraordinary proportions.
 
It doesn't bother me the least; but it turns Liberals into whiney dunces. So let's presume that Fox is a campaign arm for the GOP, does that mean you are okay with LA Times, Washington Post, New York Times, MSNBC, CBS, ABC, CNN and NBC being campaign arms of the DNC?

Not at all. But this is a thread about Benghazi, which is why Fox came up.

But, you're unable to stick to topic. When push comes to shove, and you, NOVA and the rest are painted in a corner, the battle cry just becomes "MSNBC!" and "They do it too!" I've never defended MSNBC's bias, or any of the other networks. I think the death of real journalism is a tragedy.
 
Not at all. But this is a thread about Benghazi, which is why Fox came up.

Wrong again shit-for-brains; this was not about Benghazi, but about a dimwitted effort by the dunce Zappas to re-write the record of incompetence and buffoonery of this event and defend this administration from its gross incompetence.

Fox only comes up when dimwits like you bring it up as if it is the most reprehensible forum on the planet next to…shivers…Palin.

I am amused that you seem to believe that Benghazi and this administrations buffoonery was a story unique to Fox.

But, you're unable to stick to topic. When push comes to shove, and you, NOVA and the rest are painted in a corner, the battle cry just becomes "MSNBC!" and "They do it too!" I've never defended MSNBC's bias, or any of the other networks. I think the death of real journalism is a tragedy.

Dear shit-for-brains; it was the loony leftist brigade along with you who wander way off the topic in your efforts to defend the indefensible.
 
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
Zap names people, this idiot combines people, the names of programs and the stations they broadcast on. If Zap did the same, his list would be REALLY long.

Nova is one fucking idiot.


Irony; a retarded idiot claiming others are idiots. You leftists are beyond mere stupid.

Moron.

So the best you can do is a school yard retort? Pity it doesn't change or refute the point I made. Carry on.
 
Back
Top