Where are the Zimmerman supporters now?

You certainly are an intellectual powerhouse; I have read that Superman’s powers actually came from his prenatal two-million plus posts on Kryptonite’s Just Plain Jor-el internet forum. Now that is not boring.

It is with heavy heart that I must address your catachrestic and solecistic abuse of the English language, you know, with all your posts and all. But the improper use of an ellipsis is one thing, but the use of a four dot ellipsis; well that is a grammar felony. You may have command of muskrat language, and that is debatable, but there is a difference between a typo and a misspelled word here and there without taking the time to edit posts. But since you obviously take the time during your work release program to edit your posts...hang on a second…ok, I am back; I was interrupted by my pet muskrat alerting me that in your brief two sentence declaration, you have made seven grammar errors. Since this is a forum, not a text message conduit, “LOL” is not proper grammar; incorrect use of an ellipsis; incorrect type of ellipsis used incorrectly: four dots are at the end of a sentence; no “I” and “am” before “able”; quotation mark before a comma; and another “LOL” and no stopping punctuation. That is a 25% grammar error rate, and my muskrat has worked up to only 19% grammar error rate and he only has 21 posts on the Just Plain Muskrat forum.

My vocabulary improves with each post; don't stop...this is hilarious and has the dimwit scratching his head. "did he say solecistic?"
 
Why does innocent until proven guilty not apply to black kids walking down the street? Why do they have to be judged and executed by people who make themselves judge, jury, and executioner like Zimmerman, tyrants in a limited sphere? Why do you hate justice and liberty, and support the tyranny of the individual and abolition of justice, law, and everything that is good and pure in the world?

Dear dimwit; Trayvon wasn't judged and executed. He was shot because he stalked and jumped an armed citizen while pounding his victims head into the ground MMA style.

But alas, you're a dimwit; why would you let simple facts and reality get in the way of your race hustling ignorance?
 
To you, there is no innocent until proven guilty, no defense, no equality before the law, just someone who wants to kill someone else for no reason but their own sadistic pleasure, like Zimmerman, and the person they want to kill, who has no rights and who's thoughts are worthy of no consideration, no law, no justice. You hate liberty, you hate justice, you hate freedom, you are a wannabe tyrant, just like all libertarian-fascists.

Yet you, a painfully inept dimwit, were okay with judging and prosecuting Zimmerman in the court of public opinion before proven guilty, then, because you're an ignoramus, still claim he was guilty after he was exonerated by a jury of his peers.

Yes, you and the race hustling morons our there really are THAT incredibly stupid.

Dimwit.
 
where is your proof trayvon hit first?

Dear dimwit; the court case suggested that based on all the evidence, Trayvon was not innocent and Zimmerman was acting in self-defense as the evidence indicated.

Now you can continue removing all doubt what a race hustling moron you are, or accept the facts and move on.

But I expect that because you are an extreme leftist repugnant dimwit, you will continue your effortless attempts to remove all doubt what a repugnant ignorant asshat you really are; much like your ignorant pal Poet. Yes, you really are THAT stupid.
 
This message is hidden because Superfreak is on your ignore list.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


This message is hidden because Aoxomoxoa is on your ignore list.



This message is hidden because Truth Detector is on your ignore list.
 
Dear dimwit; the court case suggested that based on all the evidence, Trayvon was not innocent and Zimmerman was acting in self-defense as the evidence indicated.

Now you can continue removing all doubt what a race hustling moron you are, or accept the facts and move on.

But I expect that because you are an extreme leftist repugnant dimwit, you will continue your effortless attempts to remove all doubt what a repugnant ignorant asshat you really are; much like your ignorant pal Poet. Yes, you really are THAT stupid.



what evidence?

did you ignore the best witness in the case?
 
what evidence?

did you ignore the best witness in the case?

You're too incredibly stupid for mere words.

THIS IS YOUR BRAIN ON STUPID - DON'T DO STUPID

Gee Desh; I don't know. Perhaps it was the evidence that got him acquitted of the murder charge?

Yes, you really are THAT incredibly STUPID.
 
Whats the over under on Zimmerman getting arrested again before the end of the year on a gun related charge?
 
There is no proof. All we have is Zimmerman's version of the event....and he's been shown, on several separate occasions to have lied.Voila.

What part of a reasonable doubt do you not understand? Where in the Florida rules of procedure does Zimmerman lying in the past have to do with the facts of the case? Of course I state this presuming you will present a lie by Zimmerman that can be proved.
 
so what the jurors thought about the process an how fair it was means nothing?

Other than the judge showing bias towards Zimmerman, can you point out what was wrong with the process in the Zimmerman trial? Or what each juror's thoughts were? This would include the jurors that were not seeking money or fame after the trial was over.
 
This message is hidden because Asa is on your ignore list.

This message is not hidden because poet is not on your ignore list for comedic relief. But if poet was on your ignore list, please feel free to post this message on the forum and chime in with an occasion comment on the posts "allegedly" on ignore.
 
Other than the judge showing bias towards Zimmerman, can you point out what was wrong with the process in the Zimmerman trial? Or what each juror's thoughts were? This would include the jurors that were not seeking money or fame after the trial was over.


why did the jurors mention stand your ground during deliberation?
 
What part of a reasonable doubt do you not understand? Where in the Florida rules of procedure does Zimmerman lying in the past have to do with the facts of the case? Of course I state this presuming you will present a lie by Zimmerman that can be proved.


the witness said she heard zimmy hit trayvon first
 
Back
Top