For those who haven't yet...

I can see why Republican heads are exploding all over the country today.... President Obama stood firm, while the Republicans tried to undermine him the entire way,

The only heads that are “exploding” are Liberal Dumbocrats who are desperately trying to defend the ineffectual rhetoric of this buffoon while exhibiting incredible hypocrisy supporting it.

It is with equal amusement when brain dead leftists continue to blame Republicans for undermining his efforts at bluster when a vast majority from his own party can’t support it.

No one has forced Syria to the bargaining table; they are laughing at us.

and without dropping a single bomb has forced Syria to the bargaining table where they have agreed to give up their chemical weapons program. SUCCESS despite an all out effort to stop America from succeeding.

What success? Has there been an announcement that Russia came to Obama’s rescue by getting an agreement from Assad?

I am amused that Russia coming to Obama’s rescue is somehow success. But then, Democrats seem to think that leading from behind is a sign of leadership and that the economy is recovering just fine.
 
Retard; Yet you asked her who she voted for. You CLEARLY DID NOT KNOW WHICH SIDE SHE IS ON.

Are you done yet or do you really enjoy failing continuously?

You're an idiot; too bad they can't do brain transplants. Even a brain from a jackass would be an improvement for you.
 
If you are Canadian, why do you care whether or not Obama meant it?

I don't think it is about Obama "reneging" on his red line statement; it is more about his ineffectual bluster to appear tough with nothing to back it up. It is even MORE of an issue when he claims he didn't draw that red line, that it was everyone else.

The man is an embarrassment of the highest order and will go down in history as a worse President than even Carter.

I care for the sake of Syria and it's people who are about to start dying under more US bombing in the ME.

Call it ineffectual bluster if you like but that doesn't change the fact that he was reluctant to follow through with his 'red line'. How can you change that fact? I really don't think you can but it's a hoot reading how you are trying. It's the best comedy routine on this forum today.

Try again!

I say that facts are simply showing that Obama dragged his feet on following through and he was and is being criticized by the right for that. There really doesn't seem to be any other way of cutting it.

And that tells me that the right will soon be onside and gung-ho for the war. It's only taking a while because they are in a fix to reconcile it some way because it's going to be a complete about turn.
 
Fighting in a UN coalition does not make nations allies. I know it is hard to wrap your tiny mind around the reality that Syria is no more a friend or ally than Russia is. We have no agreements with; we have no treaties with them.

Idiot.


Coming from the biggest flamer on the forum; irony and hypocrisy appear to be your forte’ along with childish juvenile personal insulting.

Idiot.



The sad part is that you’re too stupid to know when your “owned.” How old are you again? Using a term like “owned” is something from high school.

Idiot.



Apparently, you are too incredibly stupid to comprehend the difference between whining, which appears to be a trait of yours, and pointing out your obvious hypocrisy and stupidity.

Idiot.

There’s nothing worse than an ill-mannered hypocrite that trolls threads in a desperate effort to be relevant because they apparently have no real life or friends.

Now was there anything you wanted to add to the debate on the thread, or are you going to continue being a complete moron thinking this is about me?

For all your bullshit, you did not prove your lie about Syria to be true,

You did not reply to the post in which you were completely pwned ( a common tern for the loser of an internet debate [more ignorance on your part, idiot])

You are not even aware of common vernacular of today and,

You have yet to point out a single thing I have been hypocritical about or wrong about. You live in a different reality, a false one.

Furthermore, in hopes of not having to reply to you again, Obama does not want to bomb people. He is being prodded into doing so by the financiers of the Military Industrial Complex.

You are now officially too ignorant to respond to.
You have been incorrect in every single assertion you have made for two days and proven so.

Dismissed, Idiot.
 
I care for the sake of Syria and it's people who are about to start dying under more US bombing in the ME.

Call it ineffectual bluster if you like but that doesn't change the fact that he was reluctant to follow through with his 'red line'. How can you change that fact? I really don't think you can but it's a hoot reading how you are trying. It's the best comedy routine on this forum today.

Try again!

I say that facts are simply showing that Obama dragged his feet on following through and he was and is being criticized by the right for that. There really doesn't seem to be any other way of cutting it.

And that tells me that the right will soon be onside and gung-ho for the war. It's only taking a while because they are in a fix to reconcile it some way because it's going to be a complete about turn.

The facts suggest that Obama didn't want to bomb anyone but was backed into a corner by his own bluster and ineffective rhetoric.

The facts also suggest that after backing himself in a corner, he then lied, which is quite common with Democrats, and said it wasn't HIS redline.
 
The only heads that are “exploding” are Liberal Dumbocrats who are desperately trying to defend the ineffectual rhetoric of this buffoon while exhibiting incredible hypocrisy supporting it.

It is with equal amusement when brain dead leftists continue to blame Republicans for undermining his efforts at bluster when a vast majority from his own party can’t support it.

No one has forced Syria to the bargaining table; they are laughing at us.



What success? Has there been an announcement that Russia came to Obama’s rescue by getting an agreement from Assad?

I am amused that Russia coming to Obama’s rescue is somehow success. But then, Democrats seem to think that leading from behind is a sign of leadership and that the economy is recovering just fine.

Why should we care who laughs at us, we are the biggest military force on the planet, navy, air force, nuclear capacity, chemical weapons, cyber attacks, why should we care what little rag tag nations think of us? Lol, even Russia for that matter? Why do we have to "prove" ourselves to other nations?
 
The only heads that are “exploding” are Liberal Dumbocrats who are desperately trying to defend the ineffectual rhetoric of this buffoon while exhibiting incredible hypocrisy supporting it.

It is with equal amusement when brain dead leftists continue to blame Republicans for undermining his efforts at bluster when a vast majority from his own party can’t support it.

No one has forced Syria to the bargaining table; they are laughing at us.



What success? Has there been an announcement that Russia came to Obama’s rescue by getting an agreement from Assad?

I am amused that Russia coming to Obama’s rescue is somehow success. But then, Democrats seem to think that leading from behind is a sign of leadership and that the economy is recovering just fine.

So Syria is agreeing to give up its Chemical Weapons program just for the fun of it?
 
For all your bullshit, you did not prove your lie about Syria to be true,

You did not reply to the post in which you were completely pwned ( a common tern for the loser of an internet debate [more ignorance on your part, idiot])

You are not even aware of common vernacular of today and,

You have yet to point out a single thing I have been hypocritical about or wrong about. You live in a different reality, a false one.

Furthermore, in hopes of not having to reply to you again, Obama does not want to bomb people. He is being prodded into doing so by the financiers of the Military Industrial Complex.

You are now officially too ignorant to respond to.
You have been incorrect in every single assertion you have made for two days and proven so.

Dismissed, Idiot.

What is this, another brain dead off topic tome from the forums village idiot and painfully persistent troll; say it isn’t so!

Wackjob.
 
Why should we care who laughs at us, we are the biggest military force on the planet, navy, air force, nuclear capacity, chemical weapons, cyber attacks, why should we care what little rag tag nations think of us? Lol, even Russia for that matter? Why do we have to "prove" ourselves to other nations?

No one can be this ignorant.
 
Why should we care who laughs at us, we are the biggest military force on the planet, navy, air force, nuclear capacity, chemical weapons, cyber attacks, why should we care what little rag tag nations think of us? Lol, even Russia for that matter? Why do we have to "prove" ourselves to other nations?

You don't understand why your country has to maintain credibility? LOL

You have no perception of how much damage can be done to your country if the world turns away from America and starts to side with Russia and your other perceived enemies?

Not a very smart fucking American methinks! Likely a fucking teenager and if not then never did learn to act like a responsible adult.
 
Hey, hold on a minute. Kerry's slip of the tongue was responsible and Kerry clearly tried to get himself out of it by claiming it was just less than serious rhetoric.

So it's quite a stretch to say that Obama was responsible. More likely the Russians and Syrians picked up on Kerry's words and ran with it, making them mostly responsible.

In any case, war hasn't been averted and it will still take place. Probably on schedule too!

See my poll if you need a place to shoot your mouth off with predictions.

You see how these hate filled Republicans are, Obama is dammed if he does, dammed if he don't.

So, the Republicans were attacking Obama for inaction on Syria's use of Chemical Weapons.
Then they were attacking him for wanting to Bomb Syria for using Chemical WEapons.
Then they were attacking him because it looks like he might broker a deal out of the bluster.
If the deal does not go through, they will be attacking him for bungling the deal that should have been brokered.

All the while attempting to make the United States via President Obama look weak.
 
You see how these hate filled Republicans are, Obama is dammed if he does, dammed if he don't.

So, the Republicans were attacking Obama for inaction on Syria's use of Chemical Weapons.
Then they were attacking him for wanting to Bomb Syria for using Chemical WEapons.
Then they were attacking him because it looks like he might broker a deal out of the bluster.
If the deal does not go through, they will be attacking him for bungling the deal that should have been brokered.

All the while attempting to make the United States via President Obama look weak.

Yup, you've got it essentially right. The facts can't be twisted on the issue to suit their agenda. But all that I find important is the fact that Obama did indeed drag his feet on his red line. I would say that's an indication that he didn't want the war. I'm open to anyone's idea on how that can be counterspun though?
 
Yup, you've got it essentially right. The facts can't be twisted on the issue to suit their agenda. But all that I find important is the fact that Obama did indeed drag his feet on his red line. I would say that's an indication that he didn't want the war. I'm open to anyone's idea on how that can be counterspun though?

What do you mean, he dragged his feet?
 
No one can be this ignorant.

Lol, what is ignorant about my statement?

We don't have a better navy?

We don't a the best air force?

We don't have the most nuclear weapons?

We didn't successfully cyber attack Iran?

We shouldn't care who laughs at us?

If we should care, why?
 
You see how these hate filled Republicans are, Obama is dammed if he does, dammed if he don't.

What an amusing claim considering the hate filled bile Democrats spewed at Bush for surpassing anything Obama has experienced. Hell, the dipshits in the DNC and the left are still blaming Bush for the inept buffoon inhabiting the White House and his cabal of ignoramuses in his Cabinet; irony in the extreme.

So, the Republicans were attacking Obama for inaction on Syria's use of Chemical Weapons.

Then they were attacking him for wanting to Bomb Syria for using Chemical WEapons.

Then they were attacking him because it looks like he might broker a deal out of the bluster.

Wrong; what part of reality and the facts do you not get? No one is attacking Obama; we are pointing out his ineptness and stupidity; something hyper partisan buffoons on the left refuse to do.

We are pointing out the failure of his foreign policy resulting in events like Benghazi and his moronic red line quips that he now claims is everyone else’s.

Get a reality check dude; the criticism of his policy and rhetoric is coming from ALL sides.

If the deal does not go through, they will be attacking him for bungling the deal that should have been brokered.

What deal? There is no deal. They can’t attack Obama for a deal he had nothing to do with.

All the while attempting to make the United States via President Obama look weak.

No one has to make Obama look weak; he does that just fine by himself.

In fact, he makes himself look stupid on economics as well; all while attempting to continually improve his golf game.

Now can you explain how Liberals like yourself want to support bombing Syria over WMDs but thought we should do nothing about Saddams?

Do yourself a favor and remove those partisan goggles and swilling so much DNC kool-aid; it is making you look silly.
 
You don't understand why your country has to maintain credibility? LOL

You have no perception of how much damage can be done to your country if the world turns away from America and starts to side with Russia and your other perceived enemies?

Not a very smart fucking American methinks! Likely a fucking teenager and if not then never did learn to act like a responsible adult.

You don't know my style of posting, this was mostly said tongue in cheek for those under conservatives who feel the US s #1 and we make no mistakes. If you read any of my other posts on subject you will find I agree with more of your positions than not.

I also do not think that we should act on something for the reason that they "are laughing at us". I don't believe in the cow boy mentality.

Politicians haven't ever been credible, it has always been a game of bravado and bluster, best actor wins. I quit trusting them a long time ago, it becomes a case of who is lying the least.
 
Last edited:
What an amusing claim considering the hate filled bile Democrats spewed at Bush for surpassing anything Obama has experienced. Hell, the dipshits in the DNC and the left are still blaming Bush for the inept buffoon inhabiting the White House and his cabal of ignoramuses in his Cabinet; irony in the extreme.



Wrong; what part of reality and the facts do you not get? No one is attacking Obama; we are pointing out his ineptness and stupidity; something hyper partisan buffoons on the left refuse to do.

We are pointing out the failure of his foreign policy resulting in events like Benghazi and his moronic red line quips that he now claims is everyone else’s.

Get a reality check dude; the criticism of his policy and rhetoric is coming from ALL sides.



What deal? There is no deal. They can’t attack Obama for a deal he had nothing to do with.



No one has to make Obama look weak; he does that just fine by himself.

In fact, he makes himself look stupid on economics as well; all while attempting to continually improve his golf game.

Now can you explain how Liberals like yourself want to support bombing Syria over WMDs but thought we should do nothing about Saddams?

Do yourself a favor and remove those partisan goggles and swilling so much DNC kool-aid; it is making you look silly.
LOL
 
By the way, don't Taft2016 and Truth Detector seem alike? They at least both have very stupid avatars. And both are on my ignore list now...
 
Back
Top