For those who haven't yet...

Very good sir. You provided perfect proof of TC's assertions. What a freaking moron.

Here is a summary of most of your posts here; it is the story of a troll. The irony here is that you are too stupid to see what a hypocrite and moron you really are:

At least she has friends.

Thank God you are not in charge.

Dumbass; Annie is on your side.

You deny the existence of the Military Industrial Complex? Yes, you have quite the big brain there Mr Rove.

Has anyone ever told you it is incorrect form to ask a person who they voted for? If you can't figure out who all these partisans voted for, you hardly belong on this forum.

Aside from that the question is incredibly irrelevant.

If you think you are winning any points by calling people like Rana, Sierra or myself low information voters, you are simply blowing your credibility to smithereens.

Holy shit you are a stupid, arrogant bastard.

Yes, moron, you should readily be able to tell the stance of an extreme partisan hack like Annie. Since you don't seem capable though, I will help you this once. Annie is a conservative.

I am a progressive libertarian. See, not that hard.

It is so funny when noobs start calling long term posters trolls.
Especially one who can't even determine the political leanings of the most extreme members.

Talk about a troll.

Very good sir. You provided perfect proof of TC's assertions. What a freaking moron.


Perhaps you and your posse need a re-start on this "group think" you are engaging in. As if long term posters are entitled to act like idiots. :rolleyes:

So back to the Thread topic; Obama stepped in a pile of dogshit as an inept inexperienced buffoon is bound to do by his own bluster about red lines. Now after being cornered by his inept rhetoric, he now lies and says it wasn't his redline, but everyone else’s.

Who is going to believe someone so out of touch, inept and stupid?
 
Thanks.

I have no idea of my parent's sex lives before they met and find his statement just so creepy.

What is creepy is someone inferring that I delved into my parents sex lives based on that comment; are you really this dense or just an incredible prude?

Idiot. :rolleyes:
 
So back to the Thread topic; Obama stepped in a pile of dogshit as an inept inexperienced buffoon is bound to do by his own bluster about red lines. Now after being cornered by his inept rhetoric, he now lies and says it wasn't his redline, but everyone else’s.

Who is going to believe someone so out of touch, inept and stupid?

Which shows that you have accidentally subscribed to my theory that Obama really never did want this war. Good! When people like you prove to be too dishonest to tell the truth we can nevertheless depend on them to be stupid enough to just blurt it out anyway.
 
Which shows that you have accidentally subscribed to my theory that Obama really never did want this war. Good! When people like you prove to be too dishonest to tell the truth we can nevertheless depend on them to be stupid enough to just blurt it out anyway.

Nothing I post is an attempt to be dishonest; statements that I make are connected to facts and never lies.

Now you continue to claim that Obama never wanted this war; yet he continues to make arguments FOR it which makes you look rather foolish. That is dishonest.

Did you vote for him by any chance?
 
Syria has never been a US ally; continually saying so makes you look stupid.

Lying or being wrong continually makes you look stupid.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coalition_of_the_Gulf_War

Flaming and then not debating makes you a troll;

http://www.justplainpolitics.com/sh...-Drill-go-Solar-go-wind&p=1313012#post1313012

Getting pwned that badly makes you a stupid troll.

Whining about it and firing insults like slugs from a Thompson .45 means you are a stupid, ill mannered troll.
 
Nothing I post is an attempt to be dishonest; statements that I make are connected to facts and never lies.

Now you continue to claim that Obama never wanted this war; yet he continues to make arguments FOR it which makes you look rather foolish. That is dishonest.

Did you vote for him by any chance?

Still haven't learned a thing have you?

Don't want to take my word for it, that's fine but I will repeat for your potential edification; It is bad form to ask another person who they voted for.

That you can't discern this knowledge without asking tells volumes about your poor or lack of judgement skills as well logic processing ability.
 
What an incredible massive pile of incredible bile. How many wars have Republicans waged? Do you even have the remotest clue what war actually means?

Did you vote for Obama?

Syria is about as justifiable as JFKs logic to start American involvement in Indo China.

Iraq was the direct result of a UN action to eject Saddam from Kuwait after his atrocity laden invasion of a member state. I'm amused when liberals believe in UN action but then denounce efforts to enforce UN reolutions.

I am equally amused when Liberals like Obama who impugned the efforts in Iraq and who proclaimed they would subjugate American leadership to the UN now attempt to circumvent the UN and bomb a nation engaged in civil war. A war where there is no clear idea which regime will be worse in a nation created by European Imperialists who sought to exploit the resources in the ME.

If you had even the slightest clue, you would know that historically, Democrats have been in charge in WW I, WW II, the Korean War and the Vietnam War. Hard to believe your clueless rant that Republicans like wars.

The UN could have enforced there own sanctions, they chose not to because the evidence was clear that Saddam did not have WMD.
 
Nothing I post is an attempt to be dishonest; statements that I make are connected to facts and never lies.

Now you continue to claim that Obama never wanted this war; yet he continues to make arguments FOR it which makes you look rather foolish. That is dishonest.

Did you vote for him by any chance?

I'm a Canadian and can't vote for Obama. When people come out and claim that Obama reneged on his 'red line', which many have, then they are saying the same as he is dragging his feet on going to war. Or if you prefer, he didn't really mean it when he stated his red line.

I don't think that can be argued but you may want to try to argue that it is different than 'not really wanting war'.
 
But if this were the case, why then did the UN and world look the other way when Saddam gassed the Kurds? Why were there no threats and outrage when Iraq gassed Iranians, or when Iran gassed Iraqi’s?

Iran has chemical weapons and is developing a nuclear capability; yet no one is lobbing missiles or bombing them; why?



That’s another incredible lie. Bush Sr. didn’t let anything slide; no one cared. We didn’t care and the UN didn’t care; yet suddenly, you think we ought to care regarding Syria…why?



Another incredible lie; there were UN sanctions on Saddam because his forces had been ejected from Kuwait, a member nation of the UN that had been unjustly invaded. Bush Jr. absolutely had legal justification to go into Iraq and enforce resolutions and agreements Saddam had discarded for a decade.

The Joint Resolution contained about 250 words related to WMDs in a 1,800 plus word document; hardly a compelling case for the lie that it was all about WMDs. Read it and become informed instead of parroting the idiot talking points of the DNC.



There is a painfully obvious reason Republicans and Democrats won’t support the efforts of this Administration and idiot of a President on Syria; because the justification to do so is incredibly weak, it is so very limited, it has no chance of success and the outcomes are so unpredictable that it is not palatable.

The massive hypocrisy contained in Kerry’s statements is of profound proportions that only Liberals are capable of making. A man who was FOR the Iraq War before he was against it and who claimed that we had no business even being in Iraq, a nation that had gassed hundreds of thousands even of their own countrymen, now proclaims "history would judge us all extraordinarily harshly if we turned a blind eye to a dictator's wanton use of weapons of mass destruction against all warnings, against all common understanding of decency. These things we do know".

The only thing more moronic is this statement: "We also know that we have a President who does what he says that he will do. And he has said very clearly that whatever decision he makes in Syria, it will bear no resemblance to Afghanistan, Iraq, or even Libya".

I cannot imagine how anyone can continue to support the idiots in this Administration or this inept inexperienced buffoon of a President other than for purely partisan political purposes.

I can see why Republican heads are exploding all over the country today.... President Obama stood firm, while the Republicans tried to undermine him the entire way, and without dropping a single bomb has forced Syria to the bargaining table where they have agreed to give up their chemical weapons program.

SUCCESS despite an all out effort to stop America from succeeding.
 
Lying or being wrong continually makes you look stupid.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coalition_of_the_Gulf_War

Fighting in a UN coalition does not make nations allies. I know it is hard to wrap your tiny mind around the reality that Syria is no more a friend or ally than Russia is. We have no agreements with; we have no treaties with them.

Idiot.
Flaming and then not debating makes you a troll;

Coming from the biggest flamer on the forum; irony and hypocrisy appear to be your forte’ along with childish juvenile personal insulting.

Idiot.

Getting pwned that badly makes you a stupid troll.

The sad part is that you’re too stupid to know when your “owned.” How old are you again? Using a term like “owned” is something from high school.

Idiot.

Whining about it and firing insults like slugs from a Thompson .45 means you are a stupid, ill mannered troll.

Apparently, you are too incredibly stupid to comprehend the difference between whining, which appears to be a trait of yours, and pointing out your obvious hypocrisy and stupidity.

Idiot.

There’s nothing worse than an ill-mannered hypocrite that trolls threads in a desperate effort to be relevant because they apparently have no real life or friends.

Now was there anything you wanted to add to the debate on the thread, or are you going to continue being a complete moron thinking this is about me?
 
I can see why Republican heads are exploding all over the country today.... President Obama stood firm, while the Republicans tried to undermine him the entire way, and without dropping a single bomb has forced Syria to the bargaining table where they have agreed to give up their chemical weapons program.

SUCCESS despite an all out effort to stop America from succeeding.

Hey, hold on a minute. Kerry's slip of the tongue was responsible and Kerry clearly tried to get himself out of it by claiming it was just less than serious rhetoric.

So it's quite a stretch to say that Obama was responsible. More likely the Russians and Syrians picked up on Kerry's words and ran with it, making them mostly responsible.

In any case, war hasn't been averted and it will still take place. Probably on schedule too!

See my poll if you need a place to shoot your mouth off with predictions.
 
I'm a Canadian and can't vote for Obama. When people come out and claim that Obama reneged on his 'red line', which many have, then they are saying the same as he is dragging his feet on going to war. Or if you prefer, he didn't really mean it when he stated his red line.

I don't think that can be argued but you may want to try to argue that it is different than 'not really wanting war'.

If you are Canadian, why do you care whether or not Obama meant it?

I don't think it is about Obama "reneging" on his red line statement; it is more about his ineffectual bluster to appear tough with nothing to back it up. It is even MORE of an issue when he claims he didn't draw that red line, that it was everyone else.

The man is an embarrassment of the highest order and will go down in history as a worse President than even Carter.
 
Back
Top