1991...LOL, when did Kerry have a cozy dinner with Assad?
Did that make Syria our ally?
1991...LOL, when did Kerry have a cozy dinner with Assad?
Very good sir. You provided perfect proof of TC's assertions. What a freaking moron.
At least she has friends.
Thank God you are not in charge.
Dumbass; Annie is on your side.
You deny the existence of the Military Industrial Complex? Yes, you have quite the big brain there Mr Rove.
Has anyone ever told you it is incorrect form to ask a person who they voted for? If you can't figure out who all these partisans voted for, you hardly belong on this forum.
Aside from that the question is incredibly irrelevant.
If you think you are winning any points by calling people like Rana, Sierra or myself low information voters, you are simply blowing your credibility to smithereens.
Holy shit you are a stupid, arrogant bastard.
Yes, moron, you should readily be able to tell the stance of an extreme partisan hack like Annie. Since you don't seem capable though, I will help you this once. Annie is a conservative.
I am a progressive libertarian. See, not that hard.
It is so funny when noobs start calling long term posters trolls.
Especially one who can't even determine the political leanings of the most extreme members.
Talk about a troll.
Very good sir. You provided perfect proof of TC's assertions. What a freaking moron.
Thanks.
I have no idea of my parent's sex lives before they met and find his statement just so creepy.
So back to the Thread topic; Obama stepped in a pile of dogshit as an inept inexperienced buffoon is bound to do by his own bluster about red lines. Now after being cornered by his inept rhetoric, he now lies and says it wasn't his redline, but everyone else’s.
Who is going to believe someone so out of touch, inept and stupid?
Another one for the IA list. Where are these morons coming from? It's an invasion.
What is creepy is someone inferring that I delved into my parents sex lives based on that comment; are you really this dense or just an incredible prude?
Idiot.![]()
Which shows that you have accidentally subscribed to my theory that Obama really never did want this war. Good! When people like you prove to be too dishonest to tell the truth we can nevertheless depend on them to be stupid enough to just blurt it out anyway.
Syria has never been a US ally; continually saying so makes you look stupid.
Too fucking funny. Unbelievable.
Nothing I post is an attempt to be dishonest; statements that I make are connected to facts and never lies.
Now you continue to claim that Obama never wanted this war; yet he continues to make arguments FOR it which makes you look rather foolish. That is dishonest.
Did you vote for him by any chance?
What an incredible massive pile of incredible bile. How many wars have Republicans waged? Do you even have the remotest clue what war actually means?
Did you vote for Obama?
Syria is about as justifiable as JFKs logic to start American involvement in Indo China.
Iraq was the direct result of a UN action to eject Saddam from Kuwait after his atrocity laden invasion of a member state. I'm amused when liberals believe in UN action but then denounce efforts to enforce UN reolutions.
I am equally amused when Liberals like Obama who impugned the efforts in Iraq and who proclaimed they would subjugate American leadership to the UN now attempt to circumvent the UN and bomb a nation engaged in civil war. A war where there is no clear idea which regime will be worse in a nation created by European Imperialists who sought to exploit the resources in the ME.
If you had even the slightest clue, you would know that historically, Democrats have been in charge in WW I, WW II, the Korean War and the Vietnam War. Hard to believe your clueless rant that Republicans like wars.
The answer is that I am an incredible prude.![]()
Nothing I post is an attempt to be dishonest; statements that I make are connected to facts and never lies.
Now you continue to claim that Obama never wanted this war; yet he continues to make arguments FOR it which makes you look rather foolish. That is dishonest.
Did you vote for him by any chance?
But if this were the case, why then did the UN and world look the other way when Saddam gassed the Kurds? Why were there no threats and outrage when Iraq gassed Iranians, or when Iran gassed Iraqi’s?
Iran has chemical weapons and is developing a nuclear capability; yet no one is lobbing missiles or bombing them; why?
That’s another incredible lie. Bush Sr. didn’t let anything slide; no one cared. We didn’t care and the UN didn’t care; yet suddenly, you think we ought to care regarding Syria…why?
Another incredible lie; there were UN sanctions on Saddam because his forces had been ejected from Kuwait, a member nation of the UN that had been unjustly invaded. Bush Jr. absolutely had legal justification to go into Iraq and enforce resolutions and agreements Saddam had discarded for a decade.
The Joint Resolution contained about 250 words related to WMDs in a 1,800 plus word document; hardly a compelling case for the lie that it was all about WMDs. Read it and become informed instead of parroting the idiot talking points of the DNC.
There is a painfully obvious reason Republicans and Democrats won’t support the efforts of this Administration and idiot of a President on Syria; because the justification to do so is incredibly weak, it is so very limited, it has no chance of success and the outcomes are so unpredictable that it is not palatable.
The massive hypocrisy contained in Kerry’s statements is of profound proportions that only Liberals are capable of making. A man who was FOR the Iraq War before he was against it and who claimed that we had no business even being in Iraq, a nation that had gassed hundreds of thousands even of their own countrymen, now proclaims "history would judge us all extraordinarily harshly if we turned a blind eye to a dictator's wanton use of weapons of mass destruction against all warnings, against all common understanding of decency. These things we do know".
The only thing more moronic is this statement: "We also know that we have a President who does what he says that he will do. And he has said very clearly that whatever decision he makes in Syria, it will bear no resemblance to Afghanistan, Iraq, or even Libya".
I cannot imagine how anyone can continue to support the idiots in this Administration or this inept inexperienced buffoon of a President other than for purely partisan political purposes.
Lying or being wrong continually makes you look stupid.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coalition_of_the_Gulf_War
Flaming and then not debating makes you a troll;
Getting pwned that badly makes you a stupid troll.
Whining about it and firing insults like slugs from a Thompson .45 means you are a stupid, ill mannered troll.
I can see why Republican heads are exploding all over the country today.... President Obama stood firm, while the Republicans tried to undermine him the entire way, and without dropping a single bomb has forced Syria to the bargaining table where they have agreed to give up their chemical weapons program.
SUCCESS despite an all out effort to stop America from succeeding.
Moron; I didn't say she wasn't.
I'm a Canadian and can't vote for Obama. When people come out and claim that Obama reneged on his 'red line', which many have, then they are saying the same as he is dragging his feet on going to war. Or if you prefer, he didn't really mean it when he stated his red line.
I don't think that can be argued but you may want to try to argue that it is different than 'not really wanting war'.