I can buy into the argument that a strong middle class is mandatory for a strong and resilient democracy. I can also buy the argument that extreme concentrated wealth can result in an oligarchy where the masses become slaves. I, (mr. kill all takers) can even buy into the argument that there needs to be a fail safe to prevent that from happening, as a necessary evil, not because it's unfair or mean or because "bawwwwww poor people," but because it's the only way to ensure the masses are free and we don't descend into tyranny. I get all that on a fundamental level.
The problem is, that's not where the video is coming from. It's coming from the "woe is me, this isn't fair, this is mean, this guy makes 400x more than me I should make 100k as a janitor." They aren't concerned about freedom or autonomy. It's coming from a taker perspective that isn't concerned about the welfare of a free society, it's just people looking to get theirs. It's an argument that they believe they are entitled to other peoples money, entitled for things to be more fair. That's where they lose me. You aren't entitled to shit.
One is entitled to be compensated fairly for the fruits of one's labours. Herein lies your error. The fruits of the productivity of the greatest workers in the world (true story bro, look it up)
have not been shared fairly with the workers for 30 years now. This, combined with the completely unjust capital gains tax has skewed the field to the point of dire proportions.
The perspective of the producer of the video is entirely irrelevant, as is your whining rant about it.