apple0154
MEOW
That canard has been debunked many times over.
"The findings in this research are based on faulty methodology and the death risk is significantly overstated," National Center for Policy Analysis president John C. Goodman has explained. "The subjects were interviewed only once and the study tries to link their insurance status at that time to mortality a decade later. Yet over the period, the authors have no idea whether subjects were insured or uninsured, what kind of medical care they received, or even cause of death."
Researchers of the Harvard based their conclusion upon national surveys participants filled from 1986-1994. After checking how many of the adults died by the year 2000, researchers proceeded to make the unbelievable leap in assumption and faith that the uninsured stayed uninsured for all those years - and died as a result.
"Like unemployment, uninsurance happens to many people for short periods of time. Most people who are uninsured regain insurance with one year," Goodman wrote. "The authors of the study did not track what happened to the insurance status of the subjects over the decade examined, what medical care they received or even the causes of their deaths."
Read more: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/anthon...insurance-deaths-go-unchallenge#ixzz2D3ahPP2o
Read more: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/anthon...insurance-deaths-go-unchallenge#ixzz2DACYnk2l
From that same link. (Excerpt) "...people enrolled in Medicaid have a much higher mortality rate than the uninsured. As Goodman put it, "In other words, Medicaid enrollment reduces life expectancy rather than increasing it!"(End)
Darn those Repubs are smart people. I remember talking to my doctor, years ago. After he told me the number of people who die in hospital I told him that if I ever get sick please don't send me to a hospital!