Why Obama is hard to beat.....

callinectes said:
Yes, but do you know how to vote in the best interests of your COUNTRY?
Click to expand...

I suppose it depends on how one defines "interest". Saving the lives of 45,000 people every year who are currently prematurely dying due to a lack of medical insurance seems to me to be in a country's best interest.
 
bravo said:
You may think Apple is a 'decent person' to some degree.....but now you have his reply....and his thinking.....which reveals his logic.....

now you know, hes nothing but a creepy pinhead the will rationalize any despicable act of the Democrats and liberals to aid his Socialist/Marxist agenda
Click to expand...

This behavior and his fucked up circular logic/answers, are the reason I stopped responding to his posts.
 
Wow there are a lot of lower class type conservatives here. Hate and fear mongering though festering in your trailer parks, not so much on vote getting.
 
Billy Walsh said:
Wow there are a lot of lower class type conservatives here. Hate and fear mongering though festering in your trailer parks, not so much on vote getting.
Click to expand...

They've worked harder than everyone else, sacrificed more than everyone else, lived a more righteous life than everyone else and they'll be damned before they help anyone else.
 
obama is hard to beat because the guy is bill clinton light. he has the ability to communicate to the masses. romney....lmao...not even close.

elections are won by who people "like" the best, not on how they will be better for the country. obama has charisma, romney has wood for charisma.
 
DamnYankee said:
Apple likes the freebies.
Click to expand...

It's not freebies and that's the point you're unable to grasp. It's services offered by government, services that are expected through taxes. People pay taxes and expect something in return other than bombs and paying for new schools and water systems in countries half way around the world.

Think. Try and think for a moment. A government that spends money on bombs, destroys countries, then spends more tax money on rebuilding what they destroyed or a government that uses that tax money to help American citizens. Which government is preferable? Which government makes sense?

I don't understand why you're unable to see the obvious.
 
apple0154 said:
It's not freebies and that's the point you're unable to grasp. It's services offered by government, services that are expected through taxes. People pay taxes and expect something in return other than bombs and paying for new schools and water systems in countries half way around the world.

Think. Try and think for a moment. A government that spends money on bombs, destroys countries, then spends more tax money on rebuilding what they destroyed or a government that uses that tax money to help American citizens. Which government is preferable? Which government makes sense?

I don't understand why you're unable to see the obvious.
Click to expand...

You've presented a logical fallacy: a false dichotomy. All this because you're ashamed to admit that you like freebies.
 
DamnYankee said:
You've presented a logical fallacy: a false dichotomy. All this because you're ashamed to admit that you like freebies.
Click to expand...

No, I presented the reality. You need to check up on other countries. Expand your awareness. People pay taxes and receive services. The concept works quite well.
 
apple0154 said:
You and Dude? If that is supposed to be Dude are you telling us you like cross dressers?

To paraphrase Seinfeld, "There's nothing wrong with that." Whatever rings your bell.
Click to expand...

At least he finally admits his desire to perform anal sex on men. Fitting considering his self admitted job description.

"not that there's anything wrong with that".
 
apple0154 said:
No, I presented the reality. You need to check up on other countries. Expand your awareness. People pay taxes and receive services. The concept works quite well.
Click to expand...
No, you presented an either-or, which is a false dichotomy. The Constitution requires the federal government to defend our borders. Over the years that has been interpreted as defending our economic interests throughout the world. No one has the position that we should simply be dropping bombs.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top