First day of hearings is over.....

dude.....ANY crime you want to charge Trump for requires his personal responsibility.......so you are promising this new evidence that Trump committed a crime will show up on Monday?.....fine, we will check back with you after day 2 and you can tell us all about it......

Why are you so desperate to declare innocence before the committee report is finished and before the DOJ decides about charges?

Do you understand the militia members are already charged with sedition?
 
If you had watched the hearing, they were backed by sworn testimony and video evidence.

You refusing to see evidence does not mean it was not presented.

no, the fact that I gave you all a chance to tell us it was presented and none of you were able to, means it was not presented......
 
Why are you so desperate to declare innocence before the committee report is finished and before the DOJ decides about charges?

Do you understand the militia members are already charged with sedition?

declare innocence?......the law presumes innocence........its you folks who have to prove something.......all I did was ask someone to point to the evidence......so far, no one can.....I'm willing to give you time......shucks I've already given you six years......
 
declare innocence?......the law presumes innocence........its you folks who have to prove something.......all I did was ask someone to point to the evidence......so far, no one can.....I'm willing to give you time......shucks I've already given you six years......

Let the law work. You are desperate to kill the process. Why? Is it because you know Pedo Don is guilty of treason?
 
dude.....ANY crime you want to charge Trump for requires his personal responsibility.......so you are promising this new evidence that Trump committed a crime will show up on Monday?.....fine, we will check back with you after day 2 and you can tell us all about it......

I promised nothing, just waiting like everyone else to see what Justice will do.
 
18 U.S. Code § 2384 - Seditious conspiracy

If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.

Void argument fallacy. Inversion fallacy. This applies to Democrats.
 
We saw new evidence of the insurrection, e.g., the assault of the female police officer who testified, and there was more. Whether that is evidence against Trump depends on his culpability for the overall attack on The Capitol. The Barr video with his expanded comments on the Stolen Election lie was additional evidence from him. The purpose and importance of the hearing, however, wasn't to produce new evidence against Trump, evidence the Justice Department no doubt already has, but to convince more of the public of the seriousness of the violence and traitorous nature of the attack.

Witch! Witch! Raise the Stake! Gather the wood!
 
we both know that isn't true......since the inception of the committee we have been told they were looking at Trump's role in 1/6, we were told that he was going to jail for his crimes, that the committee was gathering evidence that would show us what sort of devious bastard he was........you don't doubt the Justice Department already has the evidence but its been a year and a half and there have been no indictments.....obviously then there is not enough evidence to convict Trump of anything......

we were told to wait for this committee to do its job.......we were told they had never before seen evidence of his crimes........hopefully, it will show up on Monday.......or will there be more days after that?.....

They've been saying Trump is going to jail for his 'crimes' since 2015. It's getting pretty old.
 
Trump said when confronted with the fact they were chanting to hang Pence that "maybe he deserves it" that is no fucking different than endorsing the action. As far as Trump calling for NG troops prior to Jan 6th you are a fucking liar, Trump NEVER called for any such thing.
He did...and Pence deserved the chant.
Former Acting Defense Secretary Christopher Miller told a House of Representatives panel that he spoke with Trump on Jan. 3, three days before the now-former president's fiery speech that preceded the violence.
The violence started BEFORE Trump finished his speech, dude. Guess by who? Antifa and BLM. Funded and supported by Democrats.
Trump asked during that meeting whether the District of Columbia's mayor had requested National Guard troops for Jan. 6, the day Congress was to ratify Joe Biden's presidential election victory.
There was no election in 2020. Biden was not elected. He was installed.
Trump told Miller to "fill" the request, the former defense secretary testified. Miller said Trump told him: "Do whatever is necessary to protect demonstrators that were executing their constitutionally protected rights."
You have a problem with that?
The DC mayor never made any such request and it's obvious Trump didn't give a shit about protecting anyone but his terrorists.
Terrorism is not a constitutional right. The DC Mayor is lying again...this time under oath.
What do you mean the FBI had intel that something like this would happen, so did Trump, he conspired to do it and was counting on it. Why the fuck do you think he told them to go "fight like hell". Trump instigated the whole thing and you are a brain dead fucking Nazi who refuses to believe.
There are no Nazis. The Nazi party was destroyed in WW2. This isn't Germany. The phrase 'fight like hell' is not illegal.
 
There are two elements to the crime: 1) whether Trump is personally responsible, 2) whether the attack was seditious or just dumb violence. The hearing showed additions to the second element; not much new to the first but keep in mind the hearing wasn't on prime time for the benefit of people who belong to political debate sites. Who knows what Garland plans to do? There are plenty of savvy observers who believe Justice has, and has had, all it needs to indict Trump.

Trump does not support BLM nor Antifa.
 
Untrue on several counts.

For one the 12th Amendment says in part… “ The President of the Senate shall, in the presence of the Senate and House of Representatives, open all the certificates and the votes shall then be counted;-”

Congress does not have authority to choose the electors for any State.
 
Back
Top