Can you point to one real lie Trump told, with the exact quote and link?

[Flash]

I posted this:



and your reply:



If this thread were about how little lefties believe Trump, this would have merit. On this thread however, it is just an emotional assertion that is meant to protest the concept of the opening post and title that you cannot provide an appropriate response to. You cannot post what the opening post and title request, so you have provided this weak substitute instead in attempt to discredit and and derail it.

If you really wish to teach Rob a lesson, go find a lie and format it into a post that conforms to what the opening post and title ask for, and add the extra impact of demonstrating in that post that you are fully conscious of what the actual definition of a lie is.

Isn't the point of talking about a president's lies to determine if we believe what he said? You are just talking semantics by admitting Trump makes false statements but they are not lies.

Also, the posters did point out lies, but Rob tried to dismiss them by making up facts---Trump didn't lie about Russian meddling because he changed the wording because he was "coerced" into do so. His proof was that it is "obvious" to him. So, Trump clearly lied. Because Rob does not admit it does not mean it was not a lie.

And it was not about just "lefties" believing Trump since many conservatives, independents, and Republicans don't believe him, either.

 

[Truth Detector]

You apear to be just another right-wing propagandist, or perhaps a Russian bot. Who's paying you to do this?

You appear to be a moron.

 

[Truth Detector]

Trump's whole history was plenty of reason to be against him. But he's certainly got you, and the rest of his dumbed-down followers thoroughly brainwashed.

 

[Truth Detector]

And, as this whole topic proves, when Trump isn't lying, he's bragging or exaggerating things to make himself look better.

 

[Truth Detector]

Anyone can check that and see that it's not just false, it's an egregious lie. Trump is one of only two presidents in well over a century who was elected without winning the popular vote (the other one was George W. Bush in 2000).

This has to be the most moronic talking point the brain dead losers on the left can meme. More of the same....

 

[Truth Detector]

If trump said that slavery was freedom then you would believe him.

Trump wouldn't say that you ignoramus on steroids. Why don't you try coming up with something sane and coherent that contains facts to argue instead of all this fabricated baloney?

 

[Truth Detector]

That's what the idiot, RL, intended.

 

[Truth Detector]

Your allegation has very serious implications if proved true. But just out of curiosity, what name would you substitute for the formality that had millions of U.S. voters flocking to their local polling place in early November, 2016?

Moron thinks the election was stolen.

 

[Truth Detector]

Isn't the point of talking about a president's lies to determine if we believe what he said? You are just talking semantics by admitting Trump makes false statements but they are not lies.

Also, the posters did point out lies, but Rob tried to dismiss them by making up facts---Trump didn't lie about Russian meddling because he changed the wording because he was "coerced" into do so. His proof was that it is "obvious" to him. So, Trump clearly lied. Because Rob does not admit it does not mean it was not a lie.

And it was not about just "lefties" believing Trump since many conservatives, independents, and Republicans don't believe him, either.

 

[Tranquillus in Exile]

The book is called “Nineteen Eighty-Four”, and there was a time when Time would have got that right.

I take it you mean the book is called “Nineteen Eighty-Four”, rather than "1984" as Time called it.

What's this then?

https://www.amazon.com/1984-Signet-...preST=_SY344_BO1,204,203,200_QL70_&dpSrc=srch

 

[Tranquillus in Exile]

Not true, because the false statements in question are harmless.

It was NOT harmless for Trump to say that he watched as "thousands and thousands of people" in Jersey City cheered the 9/11 attacks. He was deliberately feeding bigotry, and if Americans were not mostly level-headed it could have had serious consequences.

Trump didn't care, though. He repeated it next day, and went on repeating it when the local mayor, police chief and everyone who knew the facts told him it never happened. That's why I regard this as his most serious lie (or delusion) out of many thousands.

And ffs don't say you answered this in post#xxx. You didn't - you couldn't deny that he said it, so you made contrived excuses. Something about him seeing it on a local news channel, but the "liberals" immediately deleted it so nobody else saw it. Sheesh.

 

[Rat Robbersson]

I take it you mean the book is called “Nineteen Eighty-Four”, rather than "1984" as Time called it.

What's this then?

https://www.amazon.com/1984-Signet-...preST=_SY344_BO1,204,203,200_QL70_&dpSrc=srch

He's grasping at straws again. That's all he's got.

 

[Tranquillus in Exile]

Was Trump for or against intervening in Libya? Both!

 

[Rob Larrikin]

Isn't the point of talking about a president's lies to determine if we believe what he said? You are just talking semantics by admitting Trump makes false statements but they are not lies.

When you are 72, if you are POTUS, expected to say more than 50,000 words a day off the top of your head while being chased by your worst enemies, a communist press, you’ll certainly make a few false statements too. Here’s an example:

Scene: 2070 – Golf course. Reporters question President Flash

Flash: You know, I was here two years ago, playing golf.
Reporter: Did you screw that horse?
Flash: I think it was July 21.
Reporter: Did you have sex with that horse?
Flash: No, wait, it was July 22, that’s right.
Reporter: Did you give the cow a blow job?
Flash: And I said to reporters on that day, “We will build the wall…”
Reporter: How many horses have you had sex with?
Flash: And I told them Mexico would pay for it.
Reporter: Did you rape a chicken yesterday?
Flash: And I said, “They will indeed pay for it...”
Reporter: Why did you rape the elephant in the room?
Flash: I was late for my interview so I have to go now.
Reporter: Did you rape an octopus?
Flash: Funny. Real funny.
Reporter: A squid? Was it a squid?
Flash: You are sick kid, you are really sick.
Reporter: Your mother? Was it your mother?

Headlines a few hours later:

PRESIDENT SAYS HE HAD SEX WITH HORSE JULY 21, 2068.

PRESIDENT CONTRADICTS HIMSELF ABOUT WHEN HE HAD SEX WITH HORSE

PRESIDENT GETS DATE WRONG ABOUT GOLF GAME TWO YEARS AGO

PRESIDENT HAS SEX WITH HORSES AND TELLS THEM MEXICO WILL PAY

PRESIDENT HAS SEX WITH ELEPHANT BECAUSE HE WAS LATE

PRESIDENT THINKS RAPING OCTOPUSES IS REALLY FUNNY

The only true headline above was that you got the golf date wrong. It was July 23. Is that really important to you? It is to Fake News.

Also, the posters did point out lies, but Rob tried to dismiss them by making up facts---

My challenge to you is that you return to any of the lies you say I dismissed by 'making up facts' and explain how. It’s called debating.

 

[Evmetro]

Isn't the point of talking about a president's lies to determine if we believe what he said? You are just talking semantics by admitting Trump makes false statements but they are not lies.

This thread is not about discussing Trumps lies, it is meant as a place to post one specific real lie along with a link. No semantics, just what the opening post asks for.

Also, the posters did point out lies, but Rob tried to dismiss them by making up facts---Trump didn't lie about Russian meddling because he changed the wording because he was "coerced" into do so. His proof was that it is "obvious" to him. So, Trump clearly lied. Because Rob does not admit it does not mean it was not a lie.

I have yet to see a lefty post something that conforms to what the opening post and title request. Not one lefty has been able to post something that satisfies the actual definition of "lie".

And it was not about just "lefties" believing Trump since many conservatives, independents, and Republicans don't believe him, either.

This thread is not about what anybody believes, it is about posting a lie that conforms to the real definition of "lie", along with a link. You can believe whatever you want, but this thread is about a single lie and link that conform to the real definition of "lie". At this point, any lefty who wants to teach Rob a lesson absolutely MUST be able to demonstrate in his submission, how his proposed lie conforms to the real definition of "lie". Every lefty post submission so far has had to sidestep the actual definition of the word "lie", which is why this thread is still going on.

 

[Rob Larrikin]

I take it you mean the book is called “Nineteen Eighty-Four”, rather than "1984" as Time called it.

Correct. Time are supposed to have accurate investigative reporters.

What's this then?

https://www.amazon.com/1984-Signet-...preST=_SY344_BO1,204,203,200_QL70_&dpSrc=srch

That’s a store. They don’t have accurate investigative reporters, but they sometimes get it right. Try an encyclopedia.

Seriously though, either is used, but the official name is Nineteen Eighty-Four.

​

 

[Lesh]

Here's one.

The Russians are going to hack the 2018 election in favor of the Dems.

There's the latest big lie

 

[Flash]

My challenge to you is that you return to any of the lies you say I dismissed by 'making up facts' and explain how. It’s called debating.

The lie about changing the wording to "not." You made up the fact that Trump was coerced to change the wording. You have no evidence other than saying it was "obvious" to you which does not make it true. It was not obvious to many others that he was coerced and it is very likely not true. Even if he was coerced, that means he lied when he explained it. And it was with the intent to deceive, which makes it a lie.

 

[Rob Larrikin]

It was NOT harmless for Trump to say that he watched as "thousands and thousands of people" in Jersey City cheered the 9/11 attacks. He was deliberately feeding bigotry, and if Americans were not mostly level-headed it could have had serious consequences.

Fake News. Answered in #278:

Larrikin, these are the facts:

Trump said repeatedly that he saw on TV thousands of Arabs in New Jersey cheering the 9/11 attacks.

It’s clear he saw Arabs cheering the 9/11 attacks. He was asked repeatedly and made it very clear he saw them. He said that at the time it was covered so I think I understand what happened.

Nobody else reported seeing this mass celebration or anything like it.

Sure they have – you just haven’t looked. Howard Stern had firemen and others calling up at the time complaining about the Arabs or Muslims celebrating.

There isn't a scrap of video evidence for it online, on Fox News, or anywhere else.

Not of thousands, but other videos showing smaller crowds, and others around the world with more. There are also witnesses (like the Stern callers) and others you can see online.

The only people who could have attempted to cover it up would have been the Bush administration, but why would they bother?

Lefties and liberals around the world have been trying to increase their votes in all western capitalist democracies for some years now. It was triggered by the dying, retiring, or wheeling off to old people’s homes of a mountain of baby boomers every day. That’s a huge hole in votes for liberal governments. One solution was to let in hordes of illegal immigrants, letting illegals vote, legalizing votes for illegals and making Sanctuary cities, etc. When those illegals commit crimes the Lefties don’t want that published so they tell police to keep the issue quiet, and they tell their pals in Fake News to keep it covered over. This is common to all Leftist governments today from the U.S. to Australia, and their Fake News buddies. The first thing Democrats and Fake News would want covered is footage of thousands of Arabs celebrating 9/11.

The main cheering was probably only when the buildings fell. Each fall probably caused large crowds of Arabs to cheer, as a football crowd cheer when a touchdown is scored. It may have only lasted for 10 to 20 seconds, but anyone covering the scene would have heard it loud and clear. That footage would quickly be disposed of by the networks.

Stuff still survives however. There are reports of Muslims celebrating the fall of the Twin Towers during 9-11, but even these are denied by the Democrat Mayors.

This, from the New York Post.

This, from The Independent

Here is a video of Palestinians celebrating the fall of the twin towers on 911 (see more below this):

You can only put up one vid, so I’ve placed a single gap after the “https:” in the following YouTubes to disable them. Just copy and paste them into a separate browser and remove the gap.

American Muslims Celebrating 9/11 - Howard Stern Callers between 9/11/2001 and 9/13/2001:

https: //youtu.be/JCtiwBrWHUc


Another clearer version of four of the callers to Howard Stern with additional info (see description).

https: //youtu.be/1ErS12XaSDE


Muslims Celebrating 9/11 in Europe

https: //youtu.be/q-9JpRytCx0

“Another flick of Muslims celebrating 9/11. And no, it isn't faked. It is well documented the celebrations that occured in Egypt, Detroit, Montreal, Lebanon and Palestine to name a few of Muslim reaction to 9/11.”


Witness: American Muslims Celebrating 9/11

https: //youtu.be/t62Bgtjrs6I


cont.

 

[Rob Larrikin]

Trump didn't care, though. He repeated it next day, and went on repeating it when the local mayor, police chief and everyone who knew the facts told him it never happened. That's why I regard this as his most serious lie (or delusion) out of many thousands.

Take it up with Howard Stern and his callers.

you couldn't deny that he said it, so you made contrived excuses. Something about him seeing it on a local news channel, but the "liberals" immediately deleted it so nobody else saw it. Sheesh.

That’s life buddy. The Left love molding the news and protecting Arabs. What are ya gonna do?