**BREAKING NEWS** - FLYNN CASE DROPPED TOTALLY EXONERATED

archives said:
The "coup," for three and half years we have been hearing about the "coup," the "deep state," all these supposed conspiracies formulated to remove Trump from office. The nice part about supposed conspiracies, especially for those needing scapegoats, is that you never really have to prove them, just float the idea and find enough circumstantial events as we have here to keep it alive
Click to expand...

Yeah dumbass; and we have been hearing about Russia Collusion, Ukrainian hoaxes, Stormy hoaxes and how we shouldn't elect presidents using the electoral college for three years too.

#STFU "palm:

archives said:
And rest assured, if Trump were to lose in November, the melodrama will not only continue, but intensify
Click to expand...

What we can be assured of is that you are NEVER right and flail like an uneducated uninformed leftist loon. :palm:

Trump will win; you hacks will look like morons, again, and we will have to suffer another four years of your prolific stupidity.

Blasts from the past stupid moronic predictions:

archives said:
Mueller is not going to lose, at best, hung jury, meaning they do it all over again, but you are right, for eight months the right wing media has been bombarding Trump's line that Manafort had nothing to do with the campaign, but if he is somehow found not guilty, they will be shouting that it proves Trump is off the hook and it all is a witch hunt
Just shows they are reaching for straws
Click to expand...

archives said:
I don't think so, I'd estimate at least another year, he will purposely conclude well out from the 2020 election
Irony is even when Mueller concludes that won't be the end of it, especially if the Democrats take the House in November
Click to expand...
09/18/18
 
Concart said:
This. If you repeat a lie often enough, people will start to believe it.
Click to expand...

Wrong; people quit believing you almost from the minute you joined the forum. Now most have been convinced, thanks to your desperate efforts, that you are a moron. ;)
 
archives said:
Governors authority under the law, of course, but billy barr coming in out of the blue and making public statements about Governors enacting social distancing regulations is nothing more than pushing the Trump agenda, something an AG isn't suppose to do. He didn't do when the Governors began issuing the orders, he had nothing to say during Feb thru April, but when Trump started to attack the Governors, he was all over it.
Click to expand...

The thread isn't about Barr or social distancing thread troll. :palm:

Start your own thread and stop polluting this one with your stupidity.
 
archives said:
Governors authority under the law, of course, but billy barr coming in out of the blue and making public statements about Governors enacting social distancing regulations is nothing more than pushing the Trump agenda, something an AG isn't suppose to do. He didn't do when the Governors began issuing the orders, he had nothing to say during Feb thru April, but when Trump started to attack the Governors, he was all over it.
Click to expand...

Social distancing can mean more than one thing.

The more benign forms are six feet apart and etc, but things can get pretty draconian pretty quick.

Some of what I’ve seen over the past six weeks has given me the creeps. And I’m nowhere near surprised some people rebelled against some of it.

My governor might drop F Bombs on TV but he’s been pretty reasonable.
 
lb200505c20200504091438.jpg
 
BartenderElite said:
Didn't he lead a chant or 2 of "lock her up" re: Hillary?
Click to expand...

Hillary conducted the people's business on a private email server; is that legal? Do you think public officials should conduct their business beyond the scrutiny of the people who elected them? Why?

Hillary destroyed evidence in an investigation of that server; is that legal? Do you think public officials should not be held to account for destroying evidence? Why?
 
Truth Detector said:
Hillary conducted the people's business on a private email server; is that legal? Do you think public officials should conduct their business beyond the scrutiny of the people who elected them? Why?

Hillary destroyed evidence in an investigation of that server; is that legal? Do you think public officials should not be held to account for destroying evidence? Why?
Click to expand...

She has a conviction, then?
 
Darth Omar said:
It’s amazing she doesn’t lol.

Do you think Flynn would have gotten away with destroying evidence?
Click to expand...

I don't buy the persecution complex that the right seems to have. The Clinton years were defined by one failed investigation after another, that culimated in a massive "lying about an affair under oath" conclusion. Obama had to deal w/ birthers from day 1.

Hillary was not convicted, same as Flynn. You seem to think it's the "wronged party" case of all time that he went through what he did. Hillary lost an election because the FBI broke protocol to make that late-in-the-campaign announcement, which didn't pan out into anything.

Seems like a bit of a double-standard there. Quick - how many Trump admin officials have used personal email for gov't business? You can google it if you're not sure. It's more than 1.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top