you are obsessed with Barr . The only thing Barr did was to appoint a DoJ investigator to look at the Flynn fiascoGet it straight, bill barr concluded he did not lie, just like billy barr concluded Trump did obstruct, just like billy barr concluded Trump's past personal affairs still come under the current DofJ, just like billy barr concluded that Trump couldn't be indicted for a crime, just like billy barr concluded ...............
you never comment on the case itself:Earlier this year, Barr appointed U.S. Attorney Jeff Jensen of St. Louis to investigate the handling of Flynn’s case. As part of that process, the Justice Department gave Flynn’s attorneys a series of emails and notes, including one handwritten note from a senior FBI official that mapped out internal deliberations about the purpose of the Flynn interview: “What’s our goal? Truth/admission or to get him to lie, so we can prosecute him or get him fired?” the official wrote.
Other documents show that the FBI had been prepared weeks before its interview of Flynn to drop its investigation into whether he was acting at the direction of Russia.
https://www.startribune.com/ap-exclusive-justice-dept-dropping-flynn-s-criminal-case/570279302/
*Flynn was entrapped under false pretenses.
*Flynn was cleared by line agent FBI
*Strzok objected and sent himself in to try and trip up Flynn
*Strzok's initial notes found no evidence of Flynn lying
*Strzok re-wrote the 302 about 6 months late with Pages help
The initial investigation was tainted:
~~
one handwritten note from a senior FBI official that mapped out internal deliberations about the purpose of the Flynn interview: “What’s our goal? Truth/admission or to get him to lie, so we can prosecute him or get him fired?” the official wrote.
~~
I have no idea why you would want to defend any part of this Pig Circus