NRA: We shouldn't take rifles away from '10-year-old little girls' on their birthdays

Earl said:
I received a .410 shotgun when I was 13, a .22 rifle when 14.

Hunted quail, squirrels doves and rabbits.

The age of 10 is too young for gun use.
Click to expand...

I would disagree that it's too young. With the supervision of a knowledgeable adult who stresses safety and responsibility, it's not too young.
I received my first hi-power rifle at age 12. I shot it many times before I got it.
 
RB 60 said:
I would disagree that it's too young. With the supervision of a knowledgeable adult who stresses safety and responsibility, it's not too young.
I received my first hi-power rifle at age 12. I shot it many times before I got it.
Click to expand...

That was my post about 10 year olds having guns. I amended it to say that when 10 year olds have guns, it should be under adult supervision. It's a subjective opinion as all children mature differently.

I had a .410 shotgun at 13 and a .22 rifle at 14. I hunted with my father and older brothers until about 16.

I hear you about the guys like Cuomo stating the virtues of gun regulations. He probably never owned or fired a gun in his life. The back door attempts to ban guns by the left have been around since the 1930's.

We never had a gun incidence with the teenagers who had hunting rifles and shotguns. Something has changed drastically with the populace now. In my opinion, it's related to the failure of parents who won't discipline their children...or the prevalence of drugs...or both.

Keep posting, Middle America needs to be heard. We all don't live on the East or West Coast.
 
Rachel Madcow (sic)...lol

Isn't she the one whose grand expose of President Trump's tax records bombed...yes, it was her.
 
You failed to respond.

Have you no sensible answer?

reagansghost said:
Only in Floriduh

and this article is NOT from The Onion


The NRA itself says the gun its lobbyist wants little girls to have is actually 'for adults.'

The NRA's top lobbyist in Florida argued against a proposed assault weapons ban, complaining that if the law passes, young children might not get rifles for their birthdays.

"How do you tell a 10-year-old little girl who got a Ruger 10/22 with a pink stock for her birthday that her rifle is an assault weapon and she has to turn it over to government or be arrested for felony possession?" asked Marion Hammer at a Friday meeting of Florida economists to oppose the proposed ban.

The NRA and other pro-gun advocates in the state have complained that the proposal, which would be voted on in a referendum in 2020, is too broad, even though a recent Quinnipiac poll showed that 59% of Florida voters support an assault weapons ban in the state.

https://shareblue.com/nra-we-should...-10-year-old-little-girls-on-their-birthdays/
Click to expand...

Your "link" has no "link", to this comment you're complaining about; but what is the problem with a child receiving a firearm on their birthday??
 
You also failed to respond to this.

I'm sensing a pattern, regarding your abilities.

reagansghost said:
Only in Floriduh

and this article is NOT from The Onion


The NRA itself says the gun its lobbyist wants little girls to have is actually 'for adults.'

The NRA's top lobbyist in Florida argued against a proposed assault weapons ban, complaining that if the law passes, young children might not get rifles for their birthdays.

"How do you tell a 10-year-old little girl who got a Ruger 10/22 with a pink stock for her birthday that her rifle is an assault weapon and she has to turn it over to government or be arrested for felony possession?" asked Marion Hammer at a Friday meeting of Florida economists to oppose the proposed ban.

The NRA and other pro-gun advocates in the state have complained that the proposal, which would be voted on in a referendum in 2020, is too broad, even though a recent Quinnipiac poll showed that 59% of Florida voters support an assault weapons ban in the state.

https://shareblue.com/nra-we-should...-10-year-old-little-girls-on-their-birthdays/
Click to expand...

Your "link" has no "link", to this comment you're complaining about; but what is the problem with a child receiving a firearm on their birthday??
 
And a third one!!

reagansghost said:
autos are not made to kill people, guns are...…...cars are made for transportation

cancer and heart disease kill millions...….."irresponsible" people?
Click to expand...

UNTRUE; because guns are made to fire a bullet and what the person holding that gun decides to do, dictates the outcome; just like auto drivers make decisions that affect others.

Would you care to explain how "irresponsible" people are dying from cancer and heart disease??
 
Bumping for all the JPP liberals.

I've asked several times and not ONE JPP LIBERAL has ever been able to answer it:

During the 50's, 60's, and 70's trucks with gun racks, with guns in them, were common in school parking lots and yet, there was nothing like the shootings we have now; so, WHAT CHANGED??
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
Bumping for all the JPP liberals.

I've asked several times and not ONE JPP LIBERAL has ever been able to answer it:

During the 50's, 60's, and 70's trucks with gun racks, with guns in them, were common in school parking lots and yet, there was nothing like the shootings we have now; so, WHAT CHANGED??
Click to expand...

Alienation and a loss of valuing life due to multiracialism and Globalism.
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
What is your explanation, regarding multiracialism?
Click to expand...

During the fifties, America was about 90% white. Having some minorities is fine, but having too many destroys the national identity and culture. Multiracial societies have low social trust and constant fighting over representation.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top