PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
Please cite 3 criteria that substantiate your claim.
Thanks.
longest stretch of sustained unemployment
deterioration of US relations in the Middle East
increase in national debt
Please cite 3 criteria that substantiate your claim.
Thanks.
That's what I expected.Quote Originally Posted by sear View Post
Please cite 3 criteria that substantiate your claim.
Thanks.
"longest stretch of sustained unemployment
deterioration of US relations in the Middle East
increase in national debt" PP #21
Unemployment has existed in America since before the Founding."longest stretch of sustained unemployment"
When the U.S. embassy staff in Tehran were taken hostage, it paralyzed the Carter administration for 444 days. They were not released until hours after the Reagan inauguration (not due to Reagan negotiation, but for Iranian spite)."deterioration of US relations in the Middle East"
Amusing."increase in national debt"
Excellent.
By what quantifiable criteria?
- Interest rate?
- Private sector job creation?
- Successful use of the U.S. military?
- Getting U.S. prisoner / hostages back from Iran?
Please educate us all DM.
"Obama was worse than Carter, hands down"
That is your assertion.
Please cite 3 criteria that substantiate your claim.
Thanks.
Obama was worse than Carter, hands down
By "extra Constitutional", perhaps you're referring to the "signing statements" standard that the Republican president before him beefed up."#1 Intentional partisan extra Constitutional destruction of the US healthcare system." OR #23
brillig lists it as just shy of $20 $trillion. What was it on the day Obama was inaugurated?"Massive financial costs which have doubled the National debt in 8 years"
Have costs increased? Perhaps."and ruined the healthcare of millions of Americans with massive increases in out of pocket costs."
If you're active U.S. military I'll respect your opinion. I'm former U.S. military, and I'm delighted with the parsimony Obama has treated U.S. blood."#2 Demoralization and massive downsizing of US military"
ISIL's ranking military commanders are former Saddam Iraq military commanders."while an Islamic Caliphate was allowed to spring to life"
read a newspaper!"and exist generating waves of Muslim refugees with imbedded terrorists brought to a neighborhood near you."
The opposite is true, as corroborated by the other signatories to the treaty:"#3 Allowing Iran to continue to develop nuclear weapons"
nope"Those are just the top three"
longest stretch of sustained unemployment
deterioration of US relations in the Middle East
increase in national debt
By "extra Constitutional", perhaps you're referring to the "signing statements" standard that the Republican president before him beefed up.
By "destruction" I gather you mean getting millions more medical coverage that didn't have it before he took action.
brillig lists it as just shy of $20 $trillion. What was it on the day Obama was inaugurated?
Have costs increased? Perhaps.
Prove they'd not have increased further had Obama not intervened.
If you're active U.S. military I'll respect your opinion. I'm former U.S. military, and I'm delighted with the parsimony Obama has treated U.S. blood.
And regarding downsizing, the U.s. has a GDP.
If we want a more powerful military we can spend 100% GDP on it. FABULOUS !!
That will leave $zero% for everything else.
It's a whole pie.
The more we spend on military, the less we have for EVERYthing else.
The purpose of the U.S. military is to preserve U.S. sovereignty, and protect U.S. citizens and interests.
Had that protection failed; I'd agree with your criticism.
It hasn't.
I don't.
This isn't Sparta.
We needn't' spend more on military than it takes to accomplish its charter. Obama continues to succeed. Next!!
ISIL's ranking military commanders are former Saddam Iraq military commanders.
By firing them all when the U.S. took over, Bush / Cheney / Rumsfeld set the stage for that caliphate. IIRC Obama was opposed to Bush's U.S. military invasion & occupation of Iraq in the first place.
SO your blaming Obama for something he opposed, and would have prevented had he hadt he authority to do so.
read a newspaper!
Islamist terrorism is a global problem. There's a manhunt on in Germany right now for a Tunisian suspect in a mass-murder.
You blaming Obama for a condition that prevailed before he was inaugurated, and that will continue after Trump is inaugurated is silly. Convenient perhaps, but silly. Who do you think you're fooling?
The opposite is true, as corroborated by the other signatories to the treaty:
- China
- Russia
- Germany
- France
- U.K.
Portray Obama the fool in the matter all you like. FABULOUS!!
But for your allegation o have even the semblance of plausibility we would have to accept the notion that all the other signatories are also foolish.
That's not plausible. It's not even rational.
nope
I've debunked them all.
Care to try again?
And in a crushing blow to Republicans allowed ACA to remain the law of the land." Chief Justice Roberts finding that Obamacare was a massive tax increase " OR #28
It's quite an epitaph:"$10.6 trillion... burp..." OR
And that rate of change is often quantified as a yearly increase expressed, quantified numerically as a percentage."The costs have gotten way outta control" OR
A trend statistically recognizable in U.S. health-care costs before Obama was inaugurated. That's why Obama went w/ ACA."It's called an 'insurance death spiral'."
And one U.S. President Bush (younger) has uncontested claim to, for reason I've already posted."ISIS sure is some great success:"
Obviously."When ya become POTUS ..."
Excellent."Obamaprompter's gross incompetence made ISIS much worse"
This is a very familiar posting tactic."Yer happy Iran has the money and now the authority to pursue nuclear weapons" OR
Murky said:Chief Justice Roberts finding that Obamacare was a massive tax increase OR #28
And in a crushing blow to Republicans allowed ACA to remain the law of the land.
Social Security was by your standard "a massive tax increase". Therefore what?
It's quite an epitaph:
"President Obama, almost as bad as Reagan!"
Thanks for calling it to our attention.
And that rate of change is often quantified as a yearly increase expressed, quantified numerically as a percentage.
I don't recall reading any report that indicates ACA bent the cost curve upward.
A trend statistically recognizable in U.S. health-care costs before Obama was inaugurated. That's why Obama went w/ ACA.
And one U.S. President Bush (younger) has uncontested claim to, for reason I've already posted.
Obviously.
And he is.
But ISIL is not purely a U.S. problem, even if the U.S. Bush (younger) administration was a major factor in ISIL's creation.
It's not a mess the U.S. has sole duty to clean up, and the rest of the world can continue to play golf and canasta in leisure.
If you blame ISIL on Obama simply because Obama was in office at the time,
do you blame Bush for the attacks of 09/11/01? And the sub-prime mortgage meltdown which tanked our economy? That's YOUR standard.
Excellent.
Please name 3 decisions President Obama made which "made ISIS much worse", and what alternate decision the wise and benevolent President OR would have made instead which would have significantly reduced that harm.
Thanks.
This is a very familiar posting tactic.
When a poster can't refute a position I've taken, they concoct some preposterous position I've never hinted at; and then ridicule that, AS IF they're refuting a position I've taken.
Who do you think you're kidding?
I don't want to destabilize Earth with a nuclear Middle East arms race any more than you do. Why do YOU have a double-standard about it?
No.
I merely subscribe to some basic tenants of logic & plausibility, in this case Ockham's Razor.
If this deal seems worthwhile to a group as diverse as:
- The Obama administration
- China
- Russia
- Germany
- France
- U.K.
I suspect, I hope there's more talent there than there is at this recreational, amateur discussion site.
If you wish to fancy yourself superior to the combined diplomatic power of the nations listed above, be my guest.
In vivid contrast I'll confine my thought processes to more plausible, more conventional patterns of thought.
Whatever else may be true, we know Iran hasn't detonated nuclear weapons in war yet. Considering that was a deliberate intention of Secretary Kerry's in this matter, we'll have to consider this one a success.