SmarterthanYou
rebel
yes, you are.SCOTUS ignoramus
yes, you are.SCOTUS ignoramus
stating what times the chow hall is open for breakfast, lunch, and dinner is not a rule.Where in those only rule books does it say what time breakfast is served? There are a huge number of local, lessor rule books out there.
tell me how expensive COBRA is........i'll wait. Actually, don't bother answering, since i've had to use COBRA before and it was almost 1500 a month, out of pocket.You shouldn't have let your insurance lapse. COBRA lasts for 18 months. After that you are stuck with the markets that Republicans are trying to make unworkable, but something is better than nothing.
For someone who calls himself "smarter than you", it is odd that you are more often than not a cautionary tale.
It usually is in the military.stating what times the chow hall is open for breakfast, lunch, and dinner is not a rule.
It is 2% more expensive than your employer was paying. If you are an in demand employee, then your employer provided a lot of extras, which you would not get in COBRA, so in that case it would be quite a bit less than your employer was paying.Tell me how expensive COBRA is........i'll wait.
It's an advisement, not a rule. If it was a rule, It would be telling you this is the time you must eat. I was never prohibited from eating anywhere elseIt usually is in the military.
In Texas, COBRA costs approximately $509 per month on average for an individual, though some sources estimate individual plans can range from $630 to $790 per month and family plans can cost $1,750 to $2,200 per monthIt is 2% more expensive than your employer was paying. If you are an in demand employee, then your employer provided a lot of extras, which you would not get in COBRA, so in that case it would be quite a bit less than your employer was paying.
It would have been quite a bit less than your medical bills now. You thought you could save some money by going without health coverage. There was a chance you would be right, but it would be a gamble with little benefit. You lost that bet. Worse yet, you may default on that bill, costing all the responsible people more money.
Ok I watched again. Nothing about Trump and his administration.Their statement about "the current administration..." That includes Trump.
And not one statement claiming anyone had already given an illegal order.Ok I watched again. Nothing about Trump and his administration.
Watch it again then.Ok I watched again. Nothing about Trump and his administration.
They are merely reminding the viewers of the law.Watch it again then.
At 32 seconds they start linking "this administration..." to what they're saying. That is indirectly saying 'Trump' and directly linking his administration to their statements.
What they say from 32 seconds to 38 seconds has NOTHING to do with the law and EVERYTHING to do with opposing, bashing, and claiming that the current administration is doing highly illegal things.They are merely reminding the viewers of the law.
That Trump has stomped all over the Constitution shouldn’t surprise anyone that “this administration” might be good to keep an eye on.
Run off now, MAGAT. Have your mommy clean your shit filled pants
Ok the subtitles says "this administration".Watch it again then.
At 32 seconds they start linking "this administration..." to what they're saying. That is indirectly saying 'Trump' and directly linking his administration to their statements. From 32 seconds to 38 seconds, they imply that the administration is issuing illegal orders to the troops.
Is "this administration" Trump's administration? Of course it is. They directly implicated Trump and his administration as the subject of their video. They then implied, heavily implied, that Trump and his administration are issuing illegal orders to the military.Ok the subtitles says "this administration".
Conversely Trump has (or will) issued lawful orders that they never told them to disobey.
Heavily? That's only in your mind. Did they directly ask them to disobey ALL orders from Trump?Is "this administration" Trump's administration? Of course it is. They directly implicated Trump and his administration as the subject of their video. They then implied, heavily implied, that Trump and his administration are issuing illegal orders to the military.
Argumentum ad absurdum. You are hair splitting now. You are going like this:Heavily? That's only in your mind. Did they directly ask them to disobey ALL orders from Trump?
Yes or no?
Now it's "tenor". Good luck arguing in court of what you THINK is a tenor.Argumentum ad absurdum. You are hair splitting now. You are going like this:
They were just making generalized statements and not directing those at the administration. Proven false.
They were talking about the administration but on a hypothetical and really didn't imply the administration was issuing illegal orders. Proven false.
They implied the administration might be issuing illegal orders but didn't specify any particular ones. This is true but it implicates the people in the video in undermining the administration and faith the military has in their leaders.
Now you're at well, did they tell them to disobey ALL orders?
Well, given the tenor of the video, they damn well should have. The mere fact that they are telling the military to question their leader's orders at all is almost unprecedented. This is 1859 -60 pre-civil war talk. It was a big problem then, and it should be a big problem now.
Go have Mommy clean your diapers, punk. The 90 second video speaks for itself, is a reminder of military law and VERY constitutional. Opposing, bashing and pointing out the transgressions of this administration is admirable. And necessary.What they say from 32 seconds to 38 seconds has NOTHING to do with the law and EVERYTHING to do with opposing, bashing, and claiming that the current administration is doing highly illegal things.
Of course it’s the subject of their video, cunt. You’re just figuring that out?Is "this administration" Trump's administration? Of course it is. They directly implicated Trump and his administration as the subject of their video. They then implied, heavily implied, that Trump and his administration are issuing illegal orders to the military.