You Just Lived Through Earth's Hottest Year on Record. Again

SlaveForChrist said:
Again, not global. We have no significant records of the middle of the Pacific ocean in the 1800s. Same for Antarctica. Same for most of Africa, South America, etc. That's not global. You're talking about regional records in civilizations advanced enough to have the equipment to make measurements (equipment that itself was not remotely near the accuracy we currently have btw)
Click to expand...
The 'regional records' don't exist. It's not possible to measure the temperature of a 'region'. Temperature can easily vary as much as 20 deg F/mile.

SlaveForChrist said:
Of course climate change is real, it is constantly changing. It changes due to vast cycles and inputs well beyond anything we have power over.
Click to expand...
Climate cannot change. There is no value in climate that can change. Climate has no temperature.
 
AProudLefty said:
It's statistics, dumbfuck.
Click to expand...
Math errors: Failure to provide unbiased raw data. Failure to select by randN. Failure to normalize by paired randR. Failure to declare and justify variance. Failure to calculate margin of error.

Logic errors: Argument from randU fallacy, void reference fallacy.

You are denying and discarding statistical mathematics. You don't know it.
 
moon said:
The temperatures of the earth's components, core, mantle, crust and atmosphere are measurable and , of course, subject to change- but measurable nonetheless.
Mind you, folks, I am telling this to a dumbass that doesn't believe that Sweden is to the East of the UK.


Haw, haw..........................................haw.
Click to expand...
It is not possible to measure the temperature of the Earth.
Circular argument fallacy (fundamentalism).
 
Tobytone said:
Forgive me for daring to ask you to waste a moment of your precious time on my little question. It's crystal clear that your time is worth more than gold. I'm just trembling in my boots over your environmental 'prediction' looming over us like the Sword of Damocles. "the inevitable transition to the Earth no longer supporting life" ???? Others have beat you to it though. For instance, AOC's prophetic words were uttered over five years ago, which means we've got what, like two seconds left:

AOC said, "Millennials, and Gen Z, and all these folks that come after us, are looking up and we’re like 'the world will end in 12 years if we don’t address climate change, and your biggest issue is how are we gonna pay for it?'"

Help me, I'm practically paralyzed here, frozen stiff with terror. Why the hell should we even give a shit anymore? It's all over, folks, OVER.
Click to expand...
Even if humanity never manifersted itself through the evolutionary process, the earth would eventually lose the capacity to sustain life and ultimately itself. Someday, our sun will swallow all of its planet up into itself and then evntually burn out. I believe that this is the present scientific view.
 
NiftyNiblick said:
Even if humanity never manifersted itself through the evolutionary process, the earth would eventually lose the capacity to sustain life and ultimately itself. Someday, our sun will swallow all of its planet up into itself and then evntually burn out. I believe that this is the present scientific view.
Click to expand...

This is true, though I'm unsure of its relevance to this conversation. The inevitable reality that it all ends millions of years from now is a fact sometimes discussed by nihilists. They struggle to see the purpose in actions beyond those serving their immediate desires and needs.(many politicians for example)
A Nihilist might say something like, "Do whatever you can get away with for your own benefit, there are no true victims, only subjects who are either trying to exploit you or too naive to understand the game. They believe both types are equally deserving of elimination if they obstruct your path." It's an interesting topic, sometimes.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top