Yes Donnie it is a Feliny, not a civil fine!

[h=1]Rudy tries to clean up his 'nobody got killed' statement[/h]

On second thought…

Rudy Giuliani put his foot in his mouth this week when he told The Daily Beast that Michael Cohen’s crimes were, frankly, no big deal. “Nobody got killed, nobody got robbed… This was not a big crime,” he told the Beast in an interview on Wednesday.

On Friday, President Trump’s personal lawyer offered a “CORRECTION.”

CORRECTION: I didn’t say payments were not a big crime. I have said consistently that the Daniels and McDougall payments are not crimes and tweeted a great article yesterday making that point . If it isn’t a witch-hunt why are they pursuing a non-crime.

— Rudy Giuliani (@RudyGiuliani) December 14, 2018


https://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/rudy-giuliani-cohen-crimes-correction
 
Did you just spell felony as, "Feliny," in your main point, and expect people to take you seriously?

I think it is sort of accurate!

FELINEY- is more accurate of a spelling though!!

Because Donald Trump is sort of a Pussy! BLAHAHAHAHA!

We know what you mean't Opie!
 
Its clearly illegal, they sure thought it was when John Edwards did similar.
Do you have EVIDENCE? Remember how the edwards case turned out? At least lay out a theory of the crime that has occurred here. I would not be very surprised if this was not the first time Trump has done this, why would he "willfully and knowingly" dip into campaign funds to do something like this? Any scheme you can come up with is going to be much more convoluted and dangerous than simply reaching into his own pocket, which is not a crime
 
Do you have EVIDENCE? Remember how the edwards case turned out? At least lay out a theory of the crime that has occurred here. I would not be very surprised if this was not the first time Trump has done this, why would he "willfully and knowingly" dip into campaign funds to do something like this? Any scheme you can come up with is going to be much more convoluted and dangerous than simply reaching into his own pocket, which is not a crime

Yes, we all remember how the Edwards case turned out!

Turns out that Edwards gave the mother of his child a payment intended as Child Support and a gesture to take responsibility for fathering her child!

His baby mama was not a porn star- she was not threatening to sexpose him- and he admitted he was an adulterer, and based on that, was unsuitable to be president, withdrew from the race, and stepped away from his career as a Public Servant!
 
Last edited:
52 USC 30109: "Any person who knowingly&willfully commits a violation of any provision...which involves the making, receiving,or reporting of any contribution,donation,or expenditure...aggregating $25000 or more...shall be fined...or imprisoned for not more than 5 years, or both"

So how many years did Obama spend in jail for his campaign violations snowflake? How many years did Edwards spend in jail for his campaign violations snowflake?

Obama Campaign Fined Big for Hiding Donors, Keeping Illegal Donations
https://www.usnews.com/news/article...g-for-hiding-donors-keeping-illegal-donations

John Edwards indicted on campaign finance charges
https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...ory.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.a37b6a5b9025

You're such a smart attorney, I will make a bet with you. My bet is a permanent ban from this forum if Trump is sent to prison. :laugh:
 
52 USC 30109: "Any person who knowingly&willfully commits a violation of any provision...which involves the making, receiving,or reporting of any contribution,donation,or expenditure...aggregating $25000 or more...shall be fined...or imprisoned for not more than 5 years, or both"

OOOOPS!!

Former election commissioner: Cohen and Trump didn't violate campaign finance law

..................
Cohen has stated he arranged hush-money payments to two women – adult-film actress Stormy Daniels and Playboy model Karen McDougal – to not make public their unproven allegations of extramarital affairs with Donald Trump years ago. Trump has denied the allegations.

It’s my belief as a former Federal Election Commission member that such payments were not “campaign-related” – and therefore the rules and regulations governing campaign contributions don’t apply.

In fact, the only time the Justice Department has ever tried to make such a claim before – against former Democratic presidential candidate Sen. John Edwards of North Carolina – the Justice Department lost.

Furthermore, the Federal Election Commission – an independent federal agency responsible for civil enforcement of campaign finance law – didn’t consider the hush-money donations to the Edwards campaign to be campaign-related expenditures when it audited the Edwards campaign.

The bottom line: Cohen was “persuaded” to plead guilty to an action that was not an actual violation of the law.

Convicting Donald Trump of a criminal campaign finance violation will be extremely difficult, if not impossible. Just as Edwards was found not guilty, the same is likely to happen to President Trump if he is charged while he is president or after he leaves the White House.
.................

But nothing in the charges Cohen pleaded guilty to provides any evidence that the Trump campaign colluded with the Russian government to affect the outcome of the 2016 election, or that Trump violated campaign finance law. And even Trump’s bitterest opponents don’t claim he had any role in Cohen’s taxi business.

So while the headlines blare and Trump opponents line up on TV to say the Cohen plea could mean future criminal charges against President Trump and serve as grounds for impeachment, don’t be so sure.

https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/for...-and-trump-didnt-violate-campaign-finance-law
 
I am beginning to think he really is that stupid.

He thinks His supporters are that stupid, he might be correct... we will see.

^Priceless....dumb and dumbest. :laugh:

giphy.gif
 
OOOOPS!!

Former election commissioner: Cohen and Trump didn't violate campaign finance law

..................
Cohen has stated he arranged hush-money payments to two women – adult-film actress Stormy Daniels and Playboy model Karen McDougal – to not make public their unproven allegations of extramarital affairs with Donald Trump years ago. Trump has denied the allegations.

It’s my belief as a former Federal Election Commission member that such payments were not “campaign-related” – and therefore the rules and regulations governing campaign contributions don’t apply.

In fact, the only time the Justice Department has ever tried to make such a claim before – against former Democratic presidential candidate Sen. John Edwards of North Carolina – the Justice Department lost.

Furthermore, the Federal Election Commission – an independent federal agency responsible for civil enforcement of campaign finance law – didn’t consider the hush-money donations to the Edwards campaign to be campaign-related expenditures when it audited the Edwards campaign.

The bottom line: Cohen was “persuaded” to plead guilty to an action that was not an actual violation of the law.

Convicting Donald Trump of a criminal campaign finance violation will be extremely difficult, if not impossible. Just as Edwards was found not guilty, the same is likely to happen to President Trump if he is charged while he is president or after he leaves the White House.
.................

But nothing in the charges Cohen pleaded guilty to provides any evidence that the Trump campaign colluded with the Russian government to affect the outcome of the 2016 election, or that Trump violated campaign finance law. And even Trump’s bitterest opponents don’t claim he had any role in Cohen’s taxi business.

So while the headlines blare and Trump opponents line up on TV to say the Cohen plea could mean future criminal charges against President Trump and serve as grounds for impeachment, don’t be so sure.

https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/for...-and-trump-didnt-violate-campaign-finance-law

poor fritzy trying so hard

v6E6NPPlSpeDwi5VRcCY_Bike-Flip-Fail.gif
 
The spelling nazi's are out because they cant speak to the substance.

There is no substance in your whiny bloviating snowflake. You construct strawmen, then demand people break them down. You've been shown to be a blubbering fool many times over. You should take a break. We get it; you're an idiot with a severe case of TDS.

:laugh:
 
Yes, we all remember how the Edwards case turned out!

Turns out that Edwards gave the mother of his child a payment intended as Child Support and a gesture to take responsibility for fathering her child!

His baby mama was not a porn star- she was not threatening to sexpose him- and he admitted he was an adulterer, and based on that, was unsuitable to be president, withdrew from the race, and stepped away from his career as a Public Servant!

Was he convicted you dumb fuck?
 
Back
Top