Witnesses. I don't care what you traitors decide to do. You are fucked either way.

Don’t know about the 75% but it’s a majority.

But they never say that the majority wants ALL witnesses. Americans are fair-minded, for the most part, and there are legitimate questions about how all this began: if a president is going to be removed from office, shouldn’t we be sure there weren’t any shenanigans involved?

All of which means democrats were going to lose the Hunter/WB argument had the Senate voted for witnesses.

That's my point, I want Stoned to cite so I can dig into the actual metrics of any alleged poll.
 
You don't speak for all black people! You are neither elected or selected to speak for all black people !



It's still an undeniable FACT.............Blacks don't vote republiican because they are racist, lying, cheating, corrupt, violent pieces of shit who have fucked up this country beyond repair.
 
THERE WERE SEVENTEEN WITNESSES WHOSE TESTIMONY WAS HEARD FROM.....SEVENTEEN..ALL FROM THE STALIN-O-CRATS.
 
No witnesses is a confession. With witnesses you lose too.


That's your traitor, loser, cult, stupid, evil, shitfuck, unAmerican dilemma. You are ass fucked dry either way.

Cheers big ears

:cheers:

I think the senate just impeached your impeachment! Ain’t that a peach? How you like them apples?
 
It's still an undeniable FACT.............Blacks don't vote republiican because they are racist, lying, cheating, corrupt, violent pieces of shit who have fucked up this country beyond repair.

The blacks that vote Democrat do so because they would rather stay on the plantation and be judged by the color of their skin rather than have to prove the content of their character.
 
It’s sad, isn’t it. The Senate Republicans are a joke. They know he’s guilty, but spineless to do the right thing.

Democrats had plenty of opportunities to call witnesses. If their case, as they claim, is so overwhelming based on the evidence, present it and let a vote take place. It's not the Senate's responsibility to pick up the slack of Democrats that failed to do their job.
 
THERE WERE SEVENTEEN WITNESSES WHOSE TESTIMONY WAS HEARD FROM.....SEVENTEEN..ALL FROM THE STALIN-O-CRATS.

17 witnesses that Democrats claim provided them with overwhelming evidence of guilt. If that is true, arguing more witnesses need to be called now is admitting they didn't do their job and are lying about the proof they claim to have.
 
Democrats had plenty of opportunities to call witnesses. If their case, as they claim, is so overwhelming based on the evidence, present it and let a vote take place. It's not the Senate's responsibility to pick up the slack of Democrats that failed to do their job.
Thank you Pam Bondi, but this is a bogus argument. All trials have witnesses and evidence and new witnesses are often introduced after the trial begins.

Lamar Alexander doesn’t agree with you.
 
Swing-vote GOP Sen. Alexander comes out against witnesses, paving way for imminent Trump acquittal.
foxnews.com
 
Swing-vote GOP Sen. Alexander comes out against witnesses, paving way for imminent Trump acquittal.
foxnews.com

So much for Phantasmal's wishful thinking.

Not real sure about Mitt Romney yet but the polls in Utah don't look good in his favor.
 
That statement means the Democrats had to have called witnesses during the House portion of this process. Now they want the Senate to do more of what it was their job to do.

Certainly sounds that way.
Or you could say they fucked up deciding this was a gotcha.
 
So much for Phantasmal's wishful thinking.

Not real sure about Mitt Romney yet but the polls in Utah don't look good in his favor.
The polls don’t look good for a lot of Republicans, Collins. McSilly, Gardener. Mitch McConnell polls at 29.8% favorability nationwide, and 33% in Kentucky, so what’s your point?
 
Back
Top