Will The Overselling Of Global Warming Lead To A New Scientific Dark Age?

I haven't been avoiding it. I think the data you are citing is biased and wrong. What's to address? I just don't want to get into a pissing contest about it. You site your sources and I'll site mine. Whoop de fucking do. What does that prove.

Do you want to discuss policy decisions about AGW or do you want to defend fringe data?

Oh come on Mott, the "hiatus" has been noticed by Nature, is that a fringe publication?

http://www.nature.com/news/climate-...missing-heat-1.14525?WT.ec_id=NATURE-20140116
 
Seeing as it is bandied about ad nauseum I compiled a short list of climate scientists that don't subscribe to the consensus.

Robert Balling, American, former director of the Office of Climatology and is a professor of geography at Arizona State University, climatology, global climate change, and geographic information systems

John R. Christy is a climate scientist at the University of Alabama in Huntsville (UAH) whose chief interests are satellite remote sensing of global climate and global climate change. He is best known, jointly with Roy Spencer, for the first successful development of a satellite temperature record

Judith Curry American climatologist and chair of the School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences at the Georgia Institute of Techunology

Richard Lindzen (1940- ), American, dynamic meteorology, especially planetary waves.

James Lovelock (1919- ), British, Gaia hypothesis and biotic feedbacks

Patrick Michaels (1950- ), American climatologist.

Tim Patterson, paleoclimatologist and professor of geology at Carleton University in Canada.[36][37]

Fred Singer, professor emeritus of environmental sciences at the University of Virginia

Henrik Svensmark, Danish National Space Center

John Christy, professor of atmospheric science and director of the Earth System Science Center at the University of Alabama in Huntsville, contributor to IPCC.

Roy Spencer, principal research scientist, University of Alabama in Huntsville[46]

William M. Gray, professor emeritus and head of the Tropical Meteorology Project, Department of Atmospheric Science, Colorado State University[27]

Garth Paltridge, retired chief research scientist, CSIRO Division of Atmospheric Research and retired director of the Institute of the Antarctic Cooperative Research Centre, visiting fellow ANU[15]

William Kininmonth, meteorologist, former Australian delegate to World Meteorological Organization Commission for Climatology[31

Willie Soon, astrophysicist, Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics[45]

Jan Veizer, environmental geochemist, professor emeritus from University of Ottawa

Claude Allègre, politician; geochemist, emeritus professor at Institute of Geophysics (Paris)

Syun-Ichi Akasofu, retired professor of geophysics and founding director of the International Arctic Research Center of the University of Alaska Fairbanks.[49]

Nir Joseph Shaviv IsraeliAmerican physics professor, carrying out research in the fields of astrophysics and climate science. He is a professor at the Racah Institute of Physics of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem,

Craig D. Idso is the founder, former president and current chairman of the board of the Center for the Study of Carbon Dioxide and Global Change.
 
Last edited:
First please explain to me that if the data, as interpreted by you, is so compelling that ACC is not occuring then why is there a 97% consensus in the scientific literature that humans are causing global warming?

Why are you right and over 10,000 peer reviewed research publications are wrong?

http://iopscience.iop.org/1748-9326/8/2/024024/article

LOL You're freaking hilarious Freak. They didn't state an opinion on AGW because those abstracts were on different areas of climate research other than AGW. Derp, Derpt! LOL LOL

Of the 32.6% (3822 peer reviewed publications) of the Scientific abstracts between 1991 and 2011 that actually did research on AGW 97.1% endorsed the consensus position that humans are causing global warming, 0.7% rejected AGW and 0.3% were uncertain of the cause.

Lord your funny :) can't even read an abstract! LOL

funny, you can't even remember what YOU said. I was not questioning THEM... I was questioning YOU.

Take a good look at the bold in your first quote Mutt... then come on back and derp away.

Can't help but notice that once again you refuse to answer the questions I asked you.
 
Questions for Mutt the scientist to answer... just putting them all in one post...

If MAN is the primary driver of climate change AND CO2 is the greenhouse gas they blame the most for warming, then explain HOW the earth has not continued getting warmer for the better part of two DECADES, despite continuing increases in CO2 emissions?

Do you deny that the scientists promoting the AGW theory have a vested interest in it? Do they not receive funding because they present a case for alarm?

If they came out and said, 'man is having an effect on the climate change, but it is not substantial'... what would happen to their government funding Mutt?

Let us see if Mutt will actually answer the above or will he continue to run away shouting consensus?
 
So get on with eating shit and don't complain? Decent people aim to change this stinking world without you, bumsucker.

It is funny how useful useless idiots like you are always moaning about the West yet never will you hear even the slightest murmur of dissent about somewhere like Putin's Russia.

During the first weeks of 1787, an extraordinary procession set out from St Petersburg. Catherine the Great, Empress and Autocrat of all the Russias, had decided it was time to visit her people. For six months, the Empress’s journey took her across the vast southern territories her armies had seized from the Turks — the country we know today as Ukraine. At every stop, she was greeted by cheering crowds, dancing children, rockets and fireworks.

But there was a twist in the tale. Later, it emerged that the pristine villages Catherine had seen on her journey had been nothing but elaborate sets, constructed on the orders of the local governor, her former lover Prince Grigory Potemkin. According to the story, even the cheering peasants had been Potemkin’s men, dressed for the occasion. As soon as Catherine moved on, they hastily took down the set and rushed to the next location, ready to raise a cheer.

The story of the Potemkin villages may sound far-fetched. But it is no more outlandish than the grotesque reality in the Russian city of Sochi, where the Winter Olympics opened yesterday. In this sub-tropical city on the Black Sea coast, Russia’s latest autocratic leader, Vladimir Putin, has built the biggest Potemkin village in history. At three times the cost of the 2012 London Olympics, these Winter Games have turned into the perfect metaphor for Mr Putin’s regime: bloated, oppressive and deeply corrupt. Sad to say, the Olympics have a long and inglorious history as window-dressing for wicked regimes, from Hitler’s Games in Berlin in 1936 to the communist-era Moscow Games in 1980.

Even so, the Sochi Games — the most expensive of all time — are surely in a class of their own.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/a...lowed-hijacked-evil-Hitler.html#ixzz2svy2vYjO
 
Yeah, and big pharma is hiding the cure to cancer. You are a nut.

You really are a moron. The point was that he continues pretending that it is just ONE side that has a vested interest in the outcome.

Which is why you attack with your ignorance yet again rather than answer the questions. Funny how those of you who are SO sure that man is the primary driver of climate change refuse to answer the questions.
 
Back
Top