Because it's not and you can't.
Because of your brainwashed scum we are all going to die. Capitalism rules, ko?
Because it's not and you can't.
I haven't been avoiding it. I think the data you are citing is biased and wrong. What's to address? I just don't want to get into a pissing contest about it. You site your sources and I'll site mine. Whoop de fucking do. What does that prove.
Do you want to discuss policy decisions about AGW or do you want to defend fringe data?
the only ones denying it are uberlibs who just kneejerk and eschew science.Oh come on Mott, the "hiatus" has been noticed by Nature, is that a fringe publication?
http://www.nature.com/news/climate-...missing-heat-1.14525?WT.ec_id=NATURE-20140116
Yes....Capitalism rules...
Yes.
First please explain to me that if the data, as interpreted by you, is so compelling that ACC is not occuring then why is there a 97% consensus in the scientific literature that humans are causing global warming?
Why are you right and over 10,000 peer reviewed research publications are wrong?
http://iopscience.iop.org/1748-9326/8/2/024024/article
LOL You're freaking hilarious Freak. They didn't state an opinion on AGW because those abstracts were on different areas of climate research other than AGW. Derp, Derpt! LOL LOL
Of the 32.6% (3822 peer reviewed publications) of the Scientific abstracts between 1991 and 2011 that actually did research on AGW 97.1% endorsed the consensus position that humans are causing global warming, 0.7% rejected AGW and 0.3% were uncertain of the cause.
Lord your funnycan't even read an abstract! LOL
So get on with eating shit and don't complain? Decent people aim to change this stinking world without you, bumsucker.
Yeah, and big pharma is hiding the cure to cancer. You are a nut.