Will she IMPLODE ???

I dont "love to hate" fox I jsut hate lies and propaganda.

They dish it out all day long and their ratings are shrinking because of it.

Speaking of lies and propaganda:

http://www.mediaweek.com/mw/content_display/news/cable-tv/e3i833e3d242e7686abaeccf90c3f6cd881

Big Swings for Cable Ratings in Q1
March 31, 2009

-By Anthony Crupi


Thirteen of ad-supported cable’s top 40 networks notched double-digit ratings gains in the first quarter of 2009, a period that was also marked by a few violent shifts in the other direction.

According to Nielsen ratings data for the three months ended March 29, while the first- and second-tier nets accounted for an aggregate 5.2 percent increase in nightly deliveries, a handful of networks sustained declines of 10 percent or more in prime.

As expected, USA Network swept all three demos and total viewers, averaging 1.54 million adults 25-54 (an increase of 18 percent versus the first quarter of 2008), 1.46 million viewers 18-49 (up 15 percent year-over-year) and 665,000 18-34s (up 16 percent). All told, USA drew an average nightly audience of 3.26 million total viewers, an improvement of 12 percent versus the year-ago period.

Second place on the quarter went to Fox News Channel, which has been on a tear, averaging 2.26 million viewers, representing 25 percent year-over-year growth. The news net boosted its standing among the core news demo by 20 percent, averaging 515,000 adults 25-54.

TNT closed out the quarter in third place, averaging 2.15 million viewers, a 2 percent uptick. The Turner net grabbed second among adults 25-54 (1.08 million, up 5 percent), while taking third among viewers 18-49 (1.02 million, up 1 percent) and 18-34 (455,000, up 2 percent).

Fourth place went to TBS, which slipped 7 percent in prime with an average delivery of 1.86 million viewers. After TBS won the 18-34 demo outright in 2008, the net slipped 10 percent, averaging 635,000. TBS also finished second among 18-49s (1.11 million, down 6 percent) and claimed third with the 25-54 set (961,000, a drop of 5 percent versus Q1 ‘08).
 
if they only told lies and propaganda, then why are they always beating out cnnabcnbcmsnbcpbs if they always supposedly tell nothing but the truth....hummmm?
 
if they only told lies and propaganda, then why are they always beating out cnnabcnbcmsnbcpbs if they always supposedly tell nothing but the truth....hummmm?

I wouldn't personally call what they do "lies," but propoganda is accurate, and they are certainly biased.

Ratings & sales have little to do with truth. The National Enquirer also does very well...
 
if they only told lies and propaganda, then why are they always beating out cnnabcnbcmsnbcpbs if they always supposedly tell nothing but the truth....hummmm?

Probably for the same reason that the most popular television programmes consist of little to no intellectual content.
 
I'll certainly agree with you about the T.V programs..Have you seen the show, bad girls...:eek:

Sadly, i've yet to have the pleasure.

Be warned though...there's plenty more terrible programming where that came from.
 
If there was supposed to be a point there......I musta missed it....

the fact is...


The O'Reilly Factor: 100 Consecutive Months at #1!

Jerry Springer is also quite popular with another demented section of the population and also draws millions of viewers.

How important is that?

Not much .. as is O'Really, who apes a right-wing Springer.

I guess when you can't win elections and the American people reject your failed ideology, claiming victory because you have a Jerry Springer is about all you have left.
 
I guess when you can't win elections and the American people reject your failed ideology, claiming victory because you have a Jerry Springer is about all you have left.

So? is this how you feel when the Democrats lost elections? Pfeeesh
 
I wonder if they say the election was stolen if Al Franklin wins through using the courts...??? naaaaaaa
 
Back
Top