Why won’t TACO rule out a pardon for Maxwell?

Do you even know the definition of white supremacy you stupid Goddamn son of a truck stop cum drinking slut
Yes, but thanks for the overly emotional and thoroughly angry reaction. It fits you, vols. :thup:

white supremacy, beliefs and ideas purporting natural superiority of the lighter-skinned, or “white,” human races over other racial groups. In contemporary usage, the term white supremacist has been used to describe some groups espousing ultranationalist, racist, or fascist doctrines. White supremacist groups often have relied on violence to achieve their goals.
 
Indeed.

With the emphases on the core subjects, reading, writing, and math and science, our youth will return to the common sense idea of teaching children to cope in the real world.

No trans-freaks and Johnnie has two daddy’s.

No men in women’s sports or bathrooms.

President Trump has brought sanity back to our education system.
Things really are starting to change...wouldn't it be lovely to have kids prepared for the their future? For the older folks here...we remember what a good all inclusive education was all about...
I would think that would be top priority for Democrats...but then, that's who let it fall apart...
 
Indeed.

With the emphases on the core subjects, reading, writing, and math and science, our youth will return to the common sense idea of teaching children to cope in the real world.

No trans-freaks and Johnnie has two daddy’s.

No men in women’s sports or bathrooms.

President Trump has brought sanity back to our education system.
You complain about trannies then give a transwoman and stolen valor liars a pass. Fascinating, but expected from you, ex-Captain Earl.
 
Things really are starting to change...wouldn't it be lovely to have kids prepared for the their future? For the older folks here...we remember what a good all inclusive education was all about...
I would think that would be top priority for Democrats...but then, that's who let it fall apart...
Parents demanded change and change we have.

None of my children or grandchildren have ever attended public school but we all have an interest in the education that most Americans receive.

The children in our school averaged 1.2 grade units higher than public school students on the Otis-Lennon and California Achievement tests.

That needs to change and hopefully, it will.
 
Last edited:
Back to basics...
Simple, common sense...
For example: Once again, Students here will go by their names and gender assigned at birth...why was that ever even in question?
 
Parents demanded change and change we have.

None of my children or grandchildren have ever attended public school but we all have an interest in the education that most Americans get.

The children in our school averaged 1.2 grade units higher than public school students on the Otis-Lennon and California Achievement tests.

That needs to change and hopefully, it will.
Public
Schools can....and should...be wonderful... My high school is Over a 100 years old... Generations have gone there... There's a lot of pride that was really hard to keep up with Considering all the Nonsense they've thrown at teachers over the years .. Teachers
Just want to teach... (They need to get rid of those tests in an official capacity... They do so much damage when it's just numbers that someone who isn't even teaching is worried about... we see how poorly kids are doing these days.... Time for change!!)
 
So if DNA proves a sex offender didn't really do the crime he shouldn't be pardoned because a president ruled it out


A pardon should really never be ruled out
Is accepting a pardon an admission of guilt, vols?

How would DNA of rapes from 20 years ago prove Ghislaine, Jeffrey and Big Daddy are innocent?

Takes a sick fuck to pardon this POS
Ghislaine? Agreed. LOL
 
Our local public school system is top notch (top 5)But were slipping a bit here recently... That will start to turn back around this fall...
 
You're more political? Thanks for the confession.

Please define how nationalistic you believe me to be. Saying I'm "more nationalistic" is like saying I'm "more American" than you. It's a matter of a slight degree, not the same as calling me a White Nationalist racist and misogynist who supports a Pedophile for President.
I am definitely NOT calling you a White Nationalist racist.
Even if I did to break your balls, I wouldn't mean it.
Nor am I calling you a misogynist, which I don't believe that you are,
and I'm quite aware that you don't support Pigshit,

even though you may have been unwilling to support Harris to stop him.

You're vote wouldn't change Texas anyway,
so you feel free to make a protest vote for a non-viable candidate.

You are content with America the way it is, to some extent,
which means that you are willing to endure far more domestic hostility
that am I to preserve the current republic.

You are a nationalist in the sense of national chauvinism.
You love the brute force power of America
and are willing to endure MASSIVE cultural incompatibility to keep it.

Also, the current American configuration is more valuable to you
because you have no real other identities than being American.
Being so far less removed from my ancestry than you are,
that's obviously not the case for me.

I am genetically 100% Italian but American by paperwork,
and I also prefer several things about America over what's available anywhere else.
Like you, I took an oath in our military and I honored it.
I just didn't make it a career,
because that's not who I am--something easy to understand..

However, I am unapologetically political
and I don't love the concept of a United America enough
to think it's worth enduring our outrageous social regressiveness.

Being as "nationalist" as you are,
you simply don't compare our extreme social deficiencies
to what other, far more modern democracies achieve collectively for their citizens.

The reconstruction of Western Europe after WWII
simply made them socially more modern than we--
BY A LOT.


We helped them with the Marshall Plan I think it was,
but thought we were doing great just because of the 1950s industrial boom.
Socially, we were laughably old fashioned,
not caring that our progress was for male, straight, financially stable, white Protestantss, mainly.
[That's you, I believe.]


In any case, you should have known that I wasn't calling you a "nationalist" in the sense of a trumpanzee nationalist,
this despite the grievances we've had between us.
 
Last edited:
I am so sick of seeing this stupid thread. To the OP, here's the deal you stupid moron. The president cannot interfere in a criminal prosecution, and you do not pardon someone to get a testimony. It is up to the prosecuting attorney to decide whether to give immunity to a suspect in exchange for their testimony. This has nothing at all to do with Trump. Pull your head out of your stupid ass and stop posting dumbass questions and dumbass threads about Trump. Good grief. Your ignorance is making everyone here a little bit dumber for being here.
 
I am so sick of seeing this stupid thread. To the OP, here's the deal you stupid moron. The president cannot interfere in a criminal prosecution, and you do not pardon someone to get a testimony. It is up to the prosecuting attorney to decide whether to give immunity to a suspect in exchange for their testimony. This has nothing at all to do with Trump. Pull your head out of your stupid ass and stop posting dumbass questions and dumbass threads about Trump. Good grief. Your ignorance is making everyone here a little bit dumber for being here.
TACO is clearly sending a message to Maxwell.
 
Yes. I see the light, you only see the dark. :)
You feel obligated to imagine the light--that's my impression.
Anyway, it would be a scoop if we ever agreed on anything.

You're content to make a short general remark
rather than respond to the litany of specifics to which I alluded,
but that's your predisposition and prerogative alike.

We already know that we're very--perhaps extremely--different people.
You NEED a united America because your identity revolves around it.

That's an observation and opinion--not a criticism.
I'm just not like that and more inclined to take a cosmopolitan view of these matters.
 
You feel obligated to imagine the light--that's my impression.
Anyway, it would be a scoop if we ever agreed on anything.

You're content to make a short general remark
rather than respond to the litany of specifics to which I alluded,
but that's your predisposition and prerogative alike.

We already know that we're very--perhaps extremely--different people.
You NEED a united America because your identity revolves around it.

That's an observation and opinion--not a criticism.
I'm just not like that and more inclined to take a cosmopolitan view of these matters.
Of course it is.

The fact remains, I'm optimistic and hopeful. This isn't based upon Pollyanna desires, but out of long-term trends. You tend to see only a dark end. IMO, this is a sign of depression.

The fact remains, compared to 50 years ago, 100 years ago, 200 years ago and all the way back to the Romans, the world is getting better.

You're old enough to remember the 1960s yet you continue to believe today is worse than then. I disagree.
 
Of course it is.

The fact remains, I'm optimistic and hopeful. This isn't based upon Pollyanna desires, but out of long-term trends. You tend to see only a dark end. IMO, this is a sign of depression.

The fact remains, compared to 50 years ago, 100 years ago, 200 years ago and all the way back to the Romans, the world is getting better.

You're old enough to remember the 1960s yet you continue to believe today is worse than then. I disagree.
The UK's National Health Service was passed into law in 1946, the year of my birth,
and became operational in 1948.

Unless I'm mistaken, this is 2025.

Don't let anybody tell you that you're not patient, Oom!!!:)

But beyond that, and getting closer to my point,

do you also disagree that huge factions of Americans are totally incompatible from a values perspective?

If you do, that is the REAL crux of our disagreement,
not who's optimistic and who's cynical.

We're very different in temperament and personality, I'm sure we agree,
but I'm talking about values, not personal attributes.

Personal attributes are irrelevant to the issue that I'm trying to address,
ebven though I know that they're very interesting to you and many others..
 
Last edited:
The UK's National Health Service was passed into law in 1946, the year of my birth,
and became operational in 1948.

Unless I'm mistaken, this is 2025.

Don't let anybody tell you that you're not patient, Oom!!!:)
Sorry to inform you, Nifty, but this isn't the UK.

It's good you recognize that fact.

The fact you didn't understand my post is very interesting to me, neef, and indicative of your mindset. That's understandable with someone suffering from elderly depression.

Depression is a common problem among older adults, but it is not a normal part of aging. In fact, most older adults feel satisfied with their lives, despite often having more illnesses or physical challenges than younger people.

Depression is serious, and treatments including counseling and medication can help. For most people, depression gets better with treatment. Talk with your doctor if you think you might have depression.

There are several types of depression that older adults may experience:

  • Major depressive disorder — includes symptoms lasting at least two weeks that interfere with a person’s ability to perform daily tasks
  • Persistent depressive disorder (dysthymia) — a depressed mood that lasts more than two years, although the person may still be able to perform daily tasks
  • Substance/medication-induced depressive disorder — depression associated with the use, abuse, or withdrawal of substances such as alcohol or pain medication
  • Depressive disorder due to a medical condition — depression related to a separate illness such as heart disease or multiple sclerosis
 
@NiftyNiblick A 20 question online exam. These are indicators, not a diagnosis. My results are posted in the spoiler. No need for you to post yours unless you want to do so.



a1new1.jpg
 
Sorry to inform you, Nifty, but this isn't the UK.

It's good you recognize that fact.

The fact you didn't understand my post is very interesting to me, neef, and indicative of your mindset. That's understandable with someone suffering from elderly depression.

Depression is a common problem among older adults, but it is not a normal part of aging. In fact, most older adults feel satisfied with their lives, despite often having more illnesses or physical challenges than younger people.

Depression is serious, and treatments including counseling and medication can help. For most people, depression gets better with treatment. Talk with your doctor if you think you might have depression.

There are several types of depression that older adults may experience:


  • Major depressive disorder — includes symptoms lasting at least two weeks that interfere with a person’s ability to perform daily tasks
  • Persistent depressive disorder (dysthymia) — a depressed mood that lasts more than two years, although the person may still be able to perform daily tasks
  • Substance/medication-induced depressive disorder — depression associated with the use, abuse, or withdrawal of substances such as alcohol or pain medication
  • Depressive disorder due to a medical condition — depression related to a separate illness such as heart disease or multiple sclerosis
You are completely unable to grasp the central point of a discussion
precipitated by somebody other than yourself.

I directly asked you
whether or not you think that
large factions of Americans
are totally incompatible
from a values perspective.

I've been asking you this question for years,
and you can't being yourself to answer it--not directly, at least.

Mind you, I have no intertest in debating the subject.

All I want to know is your opinion on the matter.
You refuse to share it.

However, if you do not believe that,
that defines the crux of our disagreement.

The tangents that you love to take on my alleged mental disorders
are not even in the most general way
related to the topic.

They're just an attempted distraction
from your unwillingness to answer a direct question
that does or does not define the real disagreement between us--
depending on your answer.

The question is valid whether or not I even exist--with or without mental disorders.

Why are you so committed to changing the subject?
No...that's too many questions, perhaps.

Just answer the first one, please.
 
Last edited:
You are completely unable to grasp the central point of a discussion
precipitated by somebody other than yourself.
Disagreed, but thanks for the insights.
I directly asked you
whether or not you think that
large factions of Americans
are totally incompatible
from a values perspective.
And, for years, I've made it clear the answer is no, they are not incompatible. The fact you refuse to accept "no" as an answer is very interesting, neef.
 
Back
Top