Why We Must Raise Taxes on the Rich

Taichiliberal, I have to go home at this time, but I will reply to your response as soon as I can get to it. Please check back in a day or two.

If you're just going to regurgitate your previous statements and assertions, don't bother, because I won't respond as I hate just repeating the SOS 6 ways to Sunday with willfully ignorant and insipidly stubborn neocon/teabagger/libertarian/oather/birther/threeper wonks.
 
If you're just going to regurgitate your previous statements and assertions, don't bother, because I won't respond as I hate just repeating the SOS 6 ways to Sunday with willfully ignorant and insipidly stubborn neocon/teabagger/liberal/conservative/libertarian/leftist/socialist/fascist/oather/birther/nazi/anarchist/threeper wonks.

See above responses.
 
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
If you're just going to regurgitate your previous statements and assertions, don't bother, because I won't respond as I hate just repeating the SOS 6 ways to Sunday with willfully ignorant and insipidly stubborn neocon/teabagger/liberal/conservative/libertarian/leftist/socialist/fascist/oather/birther/nazi/anarchist/threeper wonks.


See above responses.

If you're referring to yourself, they just show you to be a intellectually dishonest King of clowns in 3D who can't honestly debate. Adios.
 
See above responses.

Your first responses:
"No genius, I referred to a previous exchange where I actually back up what I say, while neocon parrots like you just keep squawking what you believe, then cover your eyes when the facts don't back you up".

I see no facts from you in any statements you've given.

My statements suggest to you "strongly" that you're a neocon.

Having the opertunity to bring up true facts in defense of your own statements is something you've failed to do, and I'm still waiting.
Your second sentence suggesting that you've already given testomony of something I've asked you about, and I'm still asking you about, is something I've missed.
Maybe that's why I asked.


Yeah, "new conservative" jokers who are die hard reaganomic supporters DESPITE THE FACT that shit hasn't worked in the last 30 years....like what YOU are doing here, bunky. Your "libertarian" mind just makes you an intellectual coward to not admit such, yet your actions speak otherwise.

There is one thing you've said here that reflects a true reality which is, "that shit hasn't worked in the last 30 years". Only it's longer than 30 years, and the truth is, "socialism hasn't worked in 30+ years" is a much more true statement. Only you don't get it.

WTF are you babbling about? How the hell is raising taxes on millionaires and corporations (who can WELL afford the proposed increase) affects YOU, bunky? You're NOT rich, and DESPITE the tax breaks over the last 30 years, jobs are still being outsourced, off shore accounts being stuffed, and major downsizing is still occuring. Since when is getting a multi-billion dollar corporation to pay taxes taking away YOUR freedom? Please stop babbling teabagger/neocon/Libertarian platitudes and talk like you have some sense, will ya?

This has nothing to do with the question I asked you. Make this point after you've addressed my accusation. Which is, "you're a neocon". You want an income tax, department of education, EPA, gun restrictions, A (SS) number, Federal Reserve, ATF, DEA, a drug war, and the right of the federal government to own your body in the form of Obamacare.

Really? Because last time I checked the newspapers, magazines, radio and TV shows, neocons, teabaggers, Libertarians advocate either eliminate or drastically reduce the federal gov't, while privatizing the very gov't organizations you just mentioned. Liberals and progressive want improvements to the system. So once again, you demonstrate a "liberty" with babbling contradictions.

Libertarians don't think the federal government has any constitutional right to any of the things I've listed in previous posts.

See above responses.

It looks to me like you want a neocon, or communist society Taichiliberal.
Come on,,,,, admit it. You want an income tax, department of education, EPA, gun restrictions, A (SS) number, Federal Reserve, ATF, DEA, a drug war, and the right of the federal government to own your body in the form of Obamacare. To name a few. Don't you!


Progressive,,,,,, the way you use the word means socialist, communist, marxist. Only the word progressive is something you hide behind because you're to ashamed to admit it.
 
Your first responses:
"No genius, I referred to a previous exchange where I actually back up what I say, while neocon parrots like you just keep squawking what you believe, then cover your eyes when the facts don't back you up".

I see no facts from you in any statements you've given.

That's because Liberty is just another blinders wearing Libertarian lunkhead, folks. As the chronology of the posts shows, THIS is what our lame Liberty was responding to, yet Liberty, like the SuperFreak, doesn't have the stones or the brains to deal with the facts: http://www.justplainpolitics.com/sh...t-Raise-Taxes-on-the-Rich&p=799363#post799363
My statements suggest to you "strongly" that you're a neocon.

Having the opertunity to bring up true facts in defense of your own statements is something you've failed to do, and I'm still waiting.
Your second sentence suggesting that you've already given testomony of something I've asked you about, and I'm still asking you about, is something I've missed.
Maybe that's why I asked.


Yeah, "new conservative" jokers who are die hard reaganomic supporters DESPITE THE FACT that shit hasn't worked in the last 30 years....like what YOU are doing here, bunky. Your "libertarian" mind just makes you an intellectual coward to not admit such, yet your actions speak otherwise.

There is one thing you've said here that reflects a true reality which is, "that shit hasn't worked in the last 30 years". Only it's longer than 30 years, and the truth is, "socialism hasn't worked in 30+ years" is a much more true statement. Only you don't get it.

WTF are you babbling about? How the hell is raising taxes on millionaires and corporations (who can WELL afford the proposed increase) affects YOU, bunky? You're NOT rich, and DESPITE the tax breaks over the last 30 years, jobs are still being outsourced, off shore accounts being stuffed, and major downsizing is still occuring. Since when is getting a multi-billion dollar corporation to pay taxes taking away YOUR freedom? Please stop babbling teabagger/neocon/Libertarian platitudes and talk like you have some sense, will ya?

This has nothing to do with the question I asked you. Make this point after you've addressed my accusation. Which is, "you're a neocon". You want an income tax, department of education, EPA, gun restrictions, A (SS) number, Federal Reserve, ATF, DEA, a drug war, and the right of the federal government to own your body in the form of Obamacare.

Really? Because last time I checked the newspapers, magazines, radio and TV shows, neocons, teabaggers, Libertarians advocate either eliminate or drastically reduce the federal gov't, while privatizing the very gov't organizations you just mentioned. Liberals and progressive want improvements to the system. So once again, you demonstrate a "liberty" with babbling contradictions.

Libertarians don't think the federal government has any constitutional right to any of the things I've listed in previous posts.

See above responses.

It looks to me like you want a neocon, or communist society Taichiliberal.
Come on,,,,, admit it. You want an income tax, department of education, EPA, gun restrictions, A (SS) number, Federal Reserve, ATF, DEA, a drug war, and the right of the federal government to own your body in the form of Obamacare. To name a few. Don't you!


Progressive,,,,,, the way you use the word means socialist, communist, marxist. Only the word progressive is something you hide behind because you're to ashamed to admit it.

For those objective readers wanting to see a true exchange, check the following where you can see what an intellectually dishonest/bankrupt joker our pal Liberty really is in his above response http://www.justplainpolitics.com/sh...t-Raise-Taxes-on-the-Rich&p=804099#post804099

The above rambling, convoluted clap trap by Liberty is loaded with lies, dodges and delusional revision that the chronology of the posts do not support.

And as to why this is the last time I'll waste a post on this "liberty" fool, see the following
: http://www.justplainpolitics.com/sh...t-Raise-Taxes-on-the-Rich&p=804481#post804481
 
Last edited:
For those objective readers wanting to see a true exchange, check the following where you can see what an intellectually dishonest/bankrupt joker our pal Liberty really is in his above response http://www.justplainpolitics.com/sh...t-Raise-Taxes-on-the-Rich&p=804099#post804099

The above rambling, convoluted clap trap by Liberty is loaded with lies, dodges and delusional revision that the chronology of the posts do not support.

And as to why this is the last time I'll waste a post on this "liberty" fool, see the following
: http://www.justplainpolitics.com/sh...t-Raise-Taxes-on-the-Rich&p=804481#post804481

That's the best you can do?
 
Back
Top