why the occupiers will win in one word

USFREEDOM911 said:
So now you're complaint isn't that anyone is cheating, it's how much the cheating is.
Click to expand...

The amount has a lot to do with it. It has to do with enforcing something. The degree, if you will. Like the difference between someone having a Molotov cocktail vs a dirty bomb.

Are you now also asserting that it doesn't matter how many are ripping off the taxpayers for $1,000/mnth; because that amount could actually reach millions.
Click to expand...

There are ways to check. Besides, referring to the example I gave if a person wishes to live that type of life it's no different than a single mother "entertaining" gentleman friends, on occasion.
 
Alias said:
http://pjmedia.com/tatler/2011/10/28/the-right-to-poo-and-van-jones-skepticism/
Click to expand...

A picture from the link you posted.

IMG_4240.jpg


It reminded me of this song.

 
apple0154 said:
The amount has a lot to do with it. It has to do with enforcing something. The degree, if you will. Like the difference between someone having a Molotov cocktail vs a dirty bomb.



There are ways to check. Besides, referring to the example I gave if a person wishes to live that type of life it's no different than a single mother "entertaining" gentleman friends, on occasion.
Click to expand...

So you only complain when the amount reaches a certain degree. How nice.

Now you equate the man in question, to that of a whore.
Good comparison.
 
apple0154 said:
Try to understand that difference matters like the difference between a corner store robbery and a bank robbery.



Glad to see you approve. :)
Click to expand...

No, I don't see the difference; because in actuallity, the corner store robbery is worse.
Whereas the banks money is insured by the Feds; the store owner more then likely will have to wait for any compensation and depending on his deductible, may actually not be able to be repaid or will have to wait to file a claim against the perp. That is, if they catch him.

Yes, I do agree that the guy is a whore; except, why should the public have to pay for him?
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
No, I don't see the difference; because in actuallity, the corner store robbery is worse.
Whereas the banks money is insured by the Feds; the store owner more then likely will have to wait for any compensation and depending on his deductible, may actually not be able to be repaid or will have to wait to file a claim against the perp. That is, if they catch him.
Click to expand...

It may be worse in your view but not in society's view as witnessed by the effort to solve such crimes.

Yes, I do agree that the guy is a whore; except, why should the public have to pay for him?
Click to expand...

The question is why should others be penalized because of a few bad apples?
 
apple0154 said:
Try to understand that difference matters like the difference between a corner store robbery and a bank robbery.
Click to expand...

help me understand something about the liberal mindset here. you abhor and decry the greed and selfishness of big corporations, finance, and banker fat cats, yet show total indifference to the small mom and pop shops being robbed while using resources to protect the assets of those greedy and selfish fat cats? hows that work?
 
apple0154 said:
It may be worse in your view but not in society's view as witnessed by the effort to solve such crimes.



The question is why should others be penalized because of a few bad apples?
Click to expand...

Now you're really going to need to show evidence that a bank robbery takes precedence over a corner store robbery; because it does appear that you're just running on emotions and predisposed opinions.

Why should anyone have to pay for the bad apples?
 
SmarterThanYou said:
help me understand something about the liberal mindset here. you abhor and decry the greed and selfishness of big corporations, finance, and banker fat cats, yet show total indifference to the small mom and pop shops being robbed while using resources to protect the assets of those greedy and selfish fat cats? hows that work?
Click to expand...

It works like this. Banks have the money from many people.

Who are we to stop first: a person who vandalizes one store or a person who vandalizes a whole block? It's not about protecting the "fat cats". It's about the number involved.
 
apple0154 said:
It works like this. Banks have the money from many people.

Who are we to stop first: a person who vandalizes one store or a person who vandalizes a whole block? It's not about protecting the "fat cats". It's about the number involved.
Click to expand...

so to further display your complete and total idiocy, you're ready, willing, and able to abide by the small time thefts and robberies, just so long as the big ones are protected while you are allowed to continue hating on the big bankers?
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
Now you're really going to need to show evidence that a bank robbery takes precedence over a corner store robbery; because it does appear that you're just running on emotions and predisposed opinions.

Why should anyone have to pay for the bad apples?
Click to expand...

Refer to msg #50.
 
SmarterThanYou said:
so to further display your complete and total idiocy, you're ready, willing, and able to abide by the small time thefts and robberies, just so long as the big ones are protected while you are allowed to continue hating on the big bankers?
Click to expand...

It's a matter of resources. Get all the crooks but don't waste time on a guy who steals a chocolate bar when someone else is stealing thousands. As for hating the banks I never said that. I have a good relationship with my bank. I don't even pay a monthly fee and I use my debit card between 15 to 20 times a month.
 
apple0154 said:
It's a matter of resources. Get all the crooks but don't waste time on a guy who steals a chocolate bar when someone else is stealing thousands. As for hating the banks I never said that. I have a good relationship with my bank. I don't even pay a monthly fee and I use my debit card between 15 to 20 times a month.
Click to expand...

So you have no problem in someone stealing from your home, as long as he only takes one thing.
Before you go off on your usual "need" tangent, please take note that no where did I say he "needed" anything; but just wanted something of yours.

Let's now take that to a new level.
How about if a thousand individual people all just take one thing from your home and empty it?
Since each person only took one thing, there's no need for the Police to be involved; HUH!!
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
So you have no problem in someone stealing from your home, as long as he only takes one thing.
Before you go off on your usual "need" tangent, please take note that no where did I say he "needed" anything; but just wanted something of yours.

Let's now take that to a new level.
How about if a thousand individual people all just take one thing from your home and empty it?
Since each person only took one thing, there's no need for the Police to be involved; HUH!!
Click to expand...

It's about priority, not about whether the Police should or should not be involved. Why do you have difficulty understanding such a basic concept?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top