Why isn't the left and the never trumpers angry at Comey?

Wrong again, attempting to dismiss facts by labeling them fallacies doesn’t make them such, as I noted, rather your fallacious use of fallacies
Buzzword fallacies. Denial of logic. Go learn what 'fact' means. Go learn what 'fallacy' means. Your fallacies are YOUR fallacies. You can't blame them on me or anybody else. Inversion fallacy.
 
Buzzword fallacies. Denial of logic. Go learn what 'fact' means. Go learn what 'fallacy' means. Your fallacies are YOUR fallacies. You can't blame them on me or anybody else. Inversion fallacy.
And more fallacious fallacies on top of the multiple fallacious fallacies he already posted
 
It explains Trump's taking a knee to Putin and his not permitting their meetings to have an American translator or have their talk transcribed. Give us another explanation for that.
You really cannot prove there was never a pee tape. With the better deep fakes, we may never be able to prove with certainty there was a pee tape. It will be left in the unknown file forever.

trump certainly acted like there was a pee tape, but unknown.
 
You really cannot prove there was never a pee tape. With the better deep fakes, we may never be able to prove with certainty there was a pee tape. It will be left in the unknown file forever.

trump certainly acted like there was a pee tape, but unknown.
Putin has something big on Trump.
 
You really cannot prove there was never a pee tape. With the better deep fakes, we may never be able to prove with certainty there was a pee tape. It will be left in the unknown file forever.

trump certainly acted like there was a pee tape, but unknown.
Negative proof fallacy.
 
I wouldn’t think so, but, Russian media running nude photos from Meiania’s modeling days when Trump was elected is suspicious

“Russian State TV Airs Melania Trump’s Nudes on Prime Time”​


Notice the date, three days after Election Day

You are so easy to debunk
It means what Putin has on Trump is bigger than that.
 
Negative proof fallacy.
It is often impossible to prove a negative. It is impossible to prove a general negative. At least if it were a particular, like the claim that trump made a pee tape at 4:55 GMT on February 22nd, 1998 in Moscow, he could disprove it by proving he was somewhere else. It is literally impossible to prove false the statement trump made a pee tape at some point in his life. he cannot have an alibi for his entire life.

So when Don says
They actually believed that there is a tape out there of Trump asking a Russian prostitute to pee on a bed or some perverse shit - proven false
There is no way his statement can be correct. He is even more vague, and claims to have proven false trump was filmed ever doing "perverse shit."
 
It is often impossible to prove a negative. It is impossible to prove a general negative. At least if it were a particular, like the claim that trump made a pee tape at 4:55 GMT on February 22nd, 1998 in Moscow, he could disprove it by proving he was somewhere else. It is literally impossible to prove false the statement trump made a pee tape at some point in his life. he cannot have an alibi for his entire life.

So when Don says

There is no way his statement can be correct. He is even more vague, and claims to have proven false trump was filmed ever doing "perverse shit."
Attempted negative proof fallacy.
 
Back
Top