Why is it always democrat party run cities that turn into complete hellscapes?

Think criminals care about politics?
Have you asked them?

The real point is that who runs the show sets the policy and puts in place the seeds for crime to grow such as no policing the streets, going easy on bail, not enforcing certain crimes.

Your deliberate obfuscation is an abject concession that I am right. I humbly accept it
 
You trumpers dumbasses and your strawman arguments get it backwards.

Cities with large, poor minorities have had crime problems for decades. These poor minorities see Democrats as their only hope to ease the burdens of poverty as opposed to Republicans who they know would leave them high and dry.

Hence they elect Democrat leadership as their best hope because Democrats are the only ones with the guts and the compassion to at least try to ease their burdens.

It's not these cities turn crime and poverty infested after Democrats take over.

It's that they were already beset by these problems and Democrats are the only ones willing to try to help these people rather than throw them under the bus the way Republicans would.

Stop with your filthy ass lies.
So you are saying that cities like Detroit, Chicago, Baltimore, Oakland, St Louis, Kansas City and Philadelphia to name a few weren't the most prosperous cities in the world? That decades of democrat rule hasn't turned them into shitholes?

Decades of these poor people voting for democrats has led to nothing but failure yet you still support it. What has the democrat party done in these cities to "try to ease their burdens"?

Cut back funding on police?
Raise taxes on businesses to drive them out?
Increase regulations to decrease business productivity?

Is that their solution.

Either your party is completely stupid or they are doing this on purpose
 
So you are saying that cities like Detroit, Chicago, Baltimore, Oakland, St Louis, Kansas City and Philadelphia to name a few weren't the most prosperous cities in the world? That decades of democrat rule hasn't turned them into shitholes?

Decades of these poor people voting for democrats has led to nothing but failure yet you still support it. What has the democrat party done in these cities to "try to ease their burdens"?

Cut back funding on police?
Raise taxes on businesses to drive them out?
Increase regulations to decrease business productivity?

Is that their solution.

Either your party is completely stupid or they are doing this on purpose
Same old strawman arguments and misstatements of facts (aka lies).

The concentration of poor people in those cities is much higher than in southern Sunbelt cities where Republicans get elected as mayors and city council members.

The problems in these cities are more complicated and complex and nobody could simply legislate them away.

Poverty is something that doesn't just disappear because some suit wearing assholes cut social assistance programs and brush people off by saying "Get a job" as they're getting into their limo and heading off to the golf course.

Also, I find it amusing that a DOGE cheerleader like you would be lamenting the *supposed* defunding of any government agency, even though in this case, what you're claiming never even happened.

Funding for US police departments is up across the board.

https://abcnews.go.com/US/defunding-claims-police-funding-increased-us-cities/story?id=91511971

Raising taxes on business to drive them out? What do you think your orange idiot hero's tariffs are going to do?

Come back and talk some more about it someday when you're not so full of shit.
 
Same old strawman arguments and misstatements of facts (aka lies).

The concentration of poor people in those cities is much higher than in southern Sunbelt cities where Republicans get elected as mayors and city council members.

The problems in these cities are more complicated and complex and nobody could simply legislate them away.

Poverty is something that doesn't just disappear because some suit wearing assholes cut social assistance programs and brush people off by saying "Get a job" as they're getting into their limo and heading off to the golf course.

Also, I find it amusing that a DOGE cheerleader like you would be lamenting the *supposed* defunding of any government agency, even though in this case, what you're claiming never even happened.

Funding for US police departments is up across the board.

https://abcnews.go.com/US/defunding-claims-police-funding-increased-us-cities/story?id=91511971

Raising taxes on business to drive them out? What do you think your orange idiot hero's tariffs are going to do?

Come back and talk some more about it someday when you're not so full of shit.
Interesting, for decades I have listened to your marxists deride southern cities as poor an uneducated, yet here you saying they are more prosperous.

Now if it is true that the south with lower regulation and lower taxes is more prosperous and wealthy than your blue states with higher regulations and higher taxes don't you think there is something we can deduce from that?
 
Interesting, for decades I have listened to your marxists deride southern cities as poor an uneducated, yet here you saying they are more prosperous.
I live in a southern city, Jethro.

I've never once referred to the larger urban areas or cities in the south, as poor or uneducated.

The truth is, that even in the red state south, the larger cities are enclaves of education and civilization which, not surprisingly, are largely inhabited by Democrats.

It's the rural and semi-rural surrounding towns, municipalities and hamlets which are predominantly poor, uneducated and backwards.

These areas are the ones in which trump and conservative Republicans dominate politically.
Now if it is true that the south with lower regulation and lower taxes is more prosperous and wealthy than your blue states with higher regulations and higher taxes don't you think there is something we can deduce from that?
I don't buy your false premise that these towns are always more prosperous and wealthy or that they have lower regulations. Most regulations are determined at the state level and even if they did, as you claim result in higher prosperity, it comes at the expense of other valuable considerations. Things like environmental quality, education, services for the elderly and poor, etc.

Many of these red state rural areas are just as poor as any northern urban ghetto

Plus, it's well known that most red states take tax revenue from blue states to balance their budgets.

But overall, it's no surprise to me that you'd believe more money in the pockets of an elite few at the expense of the average citizens, is something to boast about.
 

Name the big city that is a shithole and I can almost guarantee it is run by the democrat party
But democrats try really hard, it's not their fault their ideas don't work for their intended targets, it always works out for them. Name a prominent democrat in power in any crime infested shithole that hasn't gotten rich while they 'try' to fix problems. I guarantee not one libtard will answer.
 
Back
Top