Why is Bone Spur Rump lying about La David Johnson's death?

I've listened to those that said Trump said bad things. Okay.

Now let us hear the recorded dialogue ...

Where is the recorded dialogue? Where is the recorded dialogue? The recorded dialogue?


Can it be that the anti-trump posts have not heard a recorded dialogue?

The dialogue that says things that backs up their anti-trump histrionics?
 
I am sure all the adults here on JPP are familiar with:

Pregnant women's mood disorders.

It's common to have mood swings during pregnancy because of stress, fatigue, and hormonal changes that affect your levels of neurotransmitters (chemical messengers in the brain). ... Pregnancy can be a stressful and overwhelming time.

Mood changes during pregnancy can be caused by physical stresses, fatigue, changes in your metabolism, or by the hormones estrogen and progesterone. ... Mood swings are mostly experienced during the first trimester between 6 to 10 weeks and then again in the third trimester as your body prepares for birth.

It's not you, it's your hormones causing those crazy mood swings. ... it's no wonder that during pregnancy, we find ourselves sobbing, laughing, and forgetting our ...

Welcome to the wonderful — and sometimes wacky — world of pregnancy hormones. Wonderful because these hormones are working hard to nurture the tiny life that's taken up residence inside your wife's belly (and that you'll soon be cuddling in your arms). Wacky, because in addition to taking control of her body (and often making her miserable…you have heard of morning sickness, haven't you?), hormones are also taking control of her mind — making her weepy, over-the-top excited, disproportionately pissed off, deliriously happy, and stressed out
 
The U.S. Is Losing the Battle for Influence in Africa
https://www.usnews.com/news/best-co...-is-losing-the-battle-for-influence-in-africa

Here’s How China Is Changing Africa’s Future
Moving away from Western influence, Africa is already getting a glimpse of a different future.
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/china-africa-obor_us_59a4372ce4b05710aa5dcd02

What China Knows about Africa That the West Doesn't
Throughout the last five centuries, Africa has existed in the Western imagination between two polarized extremes. One is the Africa that exists as treasure trove of spoils, a source of slaves to take as free labor, and a vast land full of natural riches for the taking. The other extreme is the Africa that is in need of saving, a place of needy and helpless souls where Westerners can live out their fantasies of missionary heroism.

However, in the dawn of the twenty-first century, a different African story has emerged which is, and should be, challenging the way that the West imagines Africa. From Nigeria to Kenya, and from Angola to Ethiopia, Africa is now one of the engines of global economic growth, clocking in over 4 percent annually. Instead of a continent in need of saving, Africa is becoming the next great frontier for development and economic opportunity. For the West to take part in this new African story, it is crucial to build a new relationship with Africa.

In postcolonial Africa, Western imagination and intervention through humanitarian aid and the presence of Western NGOs have continued this legacy of missionary zeal and the attitude that the West, without input from Africans themselves, understood what is best for Africa.

As Western nations matured through centuries of social upheaval and evolution to become more humane and comfortable societies, the image of Africa evolved from a place to be looted to a place of misery where Western man could live out his savior fantasies.

Enter the Dragon

In 2000, the Economist ran a cover story, “The Hopeless Continent,” which argued the thesis that Africa was beyond help, and doomed to a future of barbarism and underdevelopment because of its poor social institutions and corrupt governance. A few years later, this story line would face a complete rebuttal as the continent became central to the strategic interest of a rising superpower from the east: China.

Although China had established diplomatic ties with a wide number of African nations, and even participated in aiding anticolonial struggles in the continent since the fifties, its presence on the continent had largely been minimal.

However, at the onset of the twenty-first century, China, experiencing the throes of the most massive industrialization in human history, began to identify Africa, a continent full of natural resources, commodities and a vast untapped market, as a place of great long-term strategic value.

Using a diverse arsenal of tools, from increasing trade, investment, loans and infrastructure aid, China has emerged as the dominant foreign power in Africa, and as a favored partner for African countries looking to emulate its rapid development.

From a negligible trickle in 2000, China’s trade with Africa topped $160 billion in 2015, ranking as far and away the largest trade partner with the continent. In 2014, China signed more than $70 billion in infrastructure contracts in the continent, and Chinese banks now provide more loans to African nations than does the World Bank.

In the West, China’s investment into Africa has often been painted in the light of neocolonialism, or of exploitation. Certainly, aspects and incidents among China’s wide involvement can be colored in that way. China’s involvement in Africa is also clearly defined by its own interests, not altruism. However, what this criticism fails to address is how China has become so successful in Africa.
http://nationalinterest.org/feature/what-china-knows-about-africa-the-west-doesnt-16295

Wanna' know why we are in Africa? There you go.

'Terrorism' is just the way we do business.
 
Why did "Bone Spur" lie about it being terrorism?
he did?
what did he say it was ( curious). The detail that were killed on the Niger/Mali border were there as trainers.
Incredibly they were in pick up trucks! ( reminds me of ISIS) -which are wide open to assault unlike even Humvees or APCarriers.
It looks like an intelligence failure, as well as a fake to draw them into an ambush

https://www.voanews.com/a/new-detai...that-killed-us-soldiers-in-niger/4080617.html
fake terror attack attracted the soldiers to a trap outside the village, where about 50 assailants in vehicles and motorcycles armed with Kalashnikovs and heavy weapons opened fire on them. Four Nigerien soldiers and three Americans were killed on the spot. The body of the fourth American soldier was found 48 hours later, about a mile away from the initial site, CNN reported.

The attack has raised questions, especially since the U.S. Army operates drone bases in Niger and has significant intelligence resources there.

“That's what really shocked us: how, at their level, with all the resources they have, they could not have strong intelligence to avoid what happened there,” said Hassane.
....

According to a Tuareg from the region, al-Saharaoui is reported to be involved in arms and fuel trafficking. He is a former member of the Movement for Unity and Jihad in West Africa (MUJAO), which occupied and imposed sharia law in northern Mali in 2012 before being dislodged by French forces.

Al-Saharaoui, a former acquaintance of Algerian extremist and trafficker Mokhtar Bel Mokhtar*, had led the kidnapping of the nine-person staff of the Algerian consulate in Gao in 2012.
Originally from Western Sahara, he wants to control the band on the common border of Burkina Faso, Mali and Niger.

“He wants to take control of all these communities facing poverty and governance issues so that they can join his cause,” said Aksar.

The group is the latest of several jihadist organizations in the Sahel region, including the Defenders of Islam group linked to militant Iyad Ag Ghali in northern Mali. The movement for the Liberation of Macina, led by Hamadoun Koufa, remained very active in central Mali.

......
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mokhtar_Belmokhtar
* Mokhtar Belmokhtar also known as The One-Eyed, The Uncatchable,the Marlboro man is a long time smuggler
and commander of AQIM

mideast-us-libya-airstrike.jpg
 
Last edited:
Why did "Bone Spur" lie about it being terrorism?

'Terrorism is how the MIC does business' . and we've sponsored and/or created more than a few.

Terrorists are interchangeable pieces of a larger conspiracy.

US can keep fighting real or imagined 'terrorists' while the Chinese footprint continues to grow.
 
The U.S. Is Losing the Battle for Influence in Africa
https://www.usnews.com/news/best-co...-is-losing-the-battle-for-influence-in-africa

Here’s How China Is Changing Africa’s Future
Moving away from Western influence, Africa is already getting a glimpse of a different future.
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/china-africa-obor_us_59a4372ce4b05710aa5dcd02

What China Knows about Africa That the West Doesn't
Throughout the last five centuries, Africa has existed in the Western imagination between two polarized extremes. One is the Africa that exists as treasure trove of spoils, a source of slaves to take as free labor, and a vast land full of natural riches for the taking. The other extreme is the Africa that is in need of saving, a place of needy and helpless souls where Westerners can live out their fantasies of missionary heroism.

However, in the dawn of the twenty-first century, a different African story has emerged which is, and should be, challenging the way that the West imagines Africa. From Nigeria to Kenya, and from Angola to Ethiopia, Africa is now one of the engines of global economic growth, clocking in over 4 percent annually. Instead of a continent in need of saving, Africa is becoming the next great frontier for development and economic opportunity. For the West to take part in this new African story, it is crucial to build a new relationship with Africa.

In postcolonial Africa, Western imagination and intervention through humanitarian aid and the presence of Western NGOs have continued this legacy of missionary zeal and the attitude that the West, without input from Africans themselves, understood what is best for Africa.

As Western nations matured through centuries of social upheaval and evolution to become more humane and comfortable societies, the image of Africa evolved from a place to be looted to a place of misery where Western man could live out his savior fantasies.

Enter the Dragon

In 2000, the Economist ran a cover story, “The Hopeless Continent,” which argued the thesis that Africa was beyond help, and doomed to a future of barbarism and underdevelopment because of its poor social institutions and corrupt governance. A few years later, this story line would face a complete rebuttal as the continent became central to the strategic interest of a rising superpower from the east: China.

Although China had established diplomatic ties with a wide number of African nations, and even participated in aiding anticolonial struggles in the continent since the fifties, its presence on the continent had largely been minimal.

However, at the onset of the twenty-first century, China, experiencing the throes of the most massive industrialization in human history, began to identify Africa, a continent full of natural resources, commodities and a vast untapped market, as a place of great long-term strategic value.

Using a diverse arsenal of tools, from increasing trade, investment, loans and infrastructure aid, China has emerged as the dominant foreign power in Africa, and as a favored partner for African countries looking to emulate its rapid development.

From a negligible trickle in 2000, China’s trade with Africa topped $160 billion in 2015, ranking as far and away the largest trade partner with the continent. In 2014, China signed more than $70 billion in infrastructure contracts in the continent, and Chinese banks now provide more loans to African nations than does the World Bank.

In the West, China’s investment into Africa has often been painted in the light of neocolonialism, or of exploitation. Certainly, aspects and incidents among China’s wide involvement can be colored in that way. China’s involvement in Africa is also clearly defined by its own interests, not altruism. However, what this criticism fails to address is how China has become so successful in Africa.
http://nationalinterest.org/feature/what-china-knows-about-africa-the-west-doesnt-16295

Wanna' know why we are in Africa? There you go.

'Terrorism' is just the way we do business.


You should go back and fight for your homeland homey
 
'Terrorism is how the MIC does business' . and we've sponsored and/or created more than a few.

Terrorists are interchangeable pieces of a larger conspiracy.

US can keep fighting real or imagined 'terrorists' while the Chinese footprint continues to grow.

so which is it

THE RUSSIANS ARE COMING THE RUSSIANS ARE COMING
OR

THE CHINESE ARE COMING THE CHINESE ARE COMING
 
from SLATE http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/foreigners/2017/10/do_not_

This Is Not Trump’s Benghazi
The deaths of U.S. troops in Niger were a tragedy, but there’s no need for conspiracy

ome normally responsible commentators are delving into speculation about the cause of this crisis that crosses the line from reasonable speculation to irresponsible conspiracy mongering.

Case in point: MSNBC host Rachel Maddow. On her Thursday night show, in her trademark “I’m just asking questions” style, Maddow suggested that the Trump administration’s recently implemented travel ban against Chadian citizens might have something to do with the deaths of these soldiers.

On Sept. 24, Chad was added to the list of countries in the latest edition of the administration’s ban. This puzzled many observers, as Chad is a major partner of the U.S. in counterterrorism missions. (A CBS report this week suggested that the Chadian government’s failure to provide new passports for analysis was to blame.)
Since then, Chad has withdrawn hundreds of troops from Niger, where they were working with local forces to fight Boko Haram, and there’s been some speculation that this was related to the ban. Maddow took this speculation a step further by suggesting that because the Chadian troops had been pulled out, American troops were left more vulnerable than they otherwise might have been.

Many on the left are comparing the Niger story to the 2012 attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi

Maddow’s approach to this story—“just asking questions” that are neither based in evidence nor likely to contribute to an accurate understanding of what happened in Niger and why—drags liberals down the same path that conservatives traveled with Benghazi, one of irrational, fearmongering claims that only serve to prolong the suffering of the families of the fallen while doing nothing to explain the root causes of the event.

In doing so, Maddow also preyed upon Americans’ lack of knowledge about Africa, a widespread problem that ranges from not understanding how large the continent is to major news organizations mislabeling maps for national broadcast.

First, there is simply no evidence that the withdrawal of Chadian forces from Niger had anything to do with the ambush. Examining the basic geography of the crisis makes this clear.

Chad’s involvement in Niger was limited to the fight against Boko Haram, a Nigeria-based extremist movement that terrorizes civilians in northwest Nigeria, southeast Niger, southern Chad, and northern Cameroon.
The Chadians were deployed to the Diffa region, where they fought effectively against Boko Haram and restored a semblance of stability to communities the extremists had terrorized.
Their withdrawal has upset communities in the Diffa region, who (rightly) believe that their own government’s forces are incapable of protecting them from a renewed Boko Haram threat.

Diffa is on the opposite side of Niger from Tongo Tongo, where the ambush occurred

DMjKTw9WAAEnr2q.jpg


Chadian forces were not involved in counterterror efforts in this area. There are Chadians involved in the fight against ISGS and other extremist groups across the border in northern Mali, where they continue to serve, but they do not engage in Niger.

he sad truth is that what happened in Niger was almost certainly the result of human error coupled with bad luck. The attack’s perpetrators sensed an opportunity, American and Nigerien forces underestimated their vulnerability, and the attack had tragic consequences. What unfolded in those hours is unknown to most of us for now, but there will surely be investigations into what happened. The Wall Street Journal reported on Thursday that the FBI has joined military investigators looking into the incident.

American forces have been in Niger since 2012. Currently, there are about 800. Their primary mission is to advise and assist Niger’s armed forces in their fight against terrorist groups that attack their citizens. This means that American soldiers are not technically at war with the terror groups; they are there to assist the Nigeriens with tasks like locating the enemy, developing strategies and tactics, and building relationships with local leaders, whose knowledge is essential for getting accurate information about terrorists’ activities in a very remote part of the world.

The Niger mission is part of the growth of the U.S. military presence in Africa that began under the Bush administration and greatly expanded under Obama. American forces are deployed to numerous countries undertaking a wide variety of missions, almost all of which fall under the “advise and assist” mode of operation. While many of these missions are secretive for obvious reasons, their existence is not.
 
he did?
what did he say it was ( curious). The detail that were killed on the Niger/Mali border were there as trainers.
Incredibly they were in pick up trucks! ( reminds me of ISIS) -which are wide open to assault unlike even Humvees or APCarriers.
It looks like an intelligence failure, as well as a fake to draw them into an ambush

https://www.voanews.com/a/new-detai...that-killed-us-soldiers-in-niger/4080617.html
fake terror attack attracted the soldiers to a trap outside the village, where about 50 assailants in vehicles and motorcycles armed with Kalashnikovs and heavy weapons opened fire on them. Four Nigerien soldiers and three Americans were killed on the spot. The body of the fourth American soldier was found 48 hours later, about a mile away from the initial site, CNN reported.

The attack has raised questions, especially since the U.S. Army operates drone bases in Niger and has significant intelligence resources there.

“That's what really shocked us: how, at their level, with all the resources they have, they could not have strong intelligence to avoid what happened there,” said Hassane.
....

According to a Tuareg from the region, al-Saharaoui is reported to be involved in arms and fuel trafficking. He is a former member of the Movement for Unity and Jihad in West Africa (MUJAO), which occupied and imposed sharia law in northern Mali in 2012 before being dislodged by French forces.

Al-Saharaoui, a former acquaintance of Algerian extremist and trafficker Mokhtar Bel Mokhtar*, had led the kidnapping of the nine-person staff of the Algerian consulate in Gao in 2012.
Originally from Western Sahara, he wants to control the band on the common border of Burkina Faso, Mali and Niger.

“He wants to take control of all these communities facing poverty and governance issues so that they can join his cause,” said Aksar.

The group is the latest of several jihadist organizations in the Sahel region, including the Defenders of Islam group linked to militant Iyad Ag Ghali in northern Mali. The movement for the Liberation of Macina, led by Hamadoun Koufa, remained very active in central Mali.

......
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mokhtar_Belmokhtar
* Mokhtar Belmokhtar also known as The One-Eyed, The Uncatchable,the Marlboro man is a long time smuggler
and commander of AQIM

mideast-us-libya-airstrike.jpg

Old "Bone Spur" has been on the Golf Course, he has not said what it was, he certainly has yet to call it terrorism. We need a 3 year investigation into this!
 
'Terrorism is how the MIC does business' . and we've sponsored and/or created more than a few.

Terrorists are interchangeable pieces of a larger conspiracy.

US can keep fighting real or imagined 'terrorists' while the Chinese footprint continues to grow.

Do you consider a growing China to be "bad" for America?
 
Kelly's honor and integrity are above reproach, that whacked nigger Fredricka Wilson is another matter altogether, she is exploiting the grief of a barely literate war widow and it is disgusting and so are you.

Oh joy...yet ANOTHER racist POS Trumpkin.

Absolutely pathetic how many Racists congregate at JPP.
 
Old "Bone Spur" has been on the Golf Course, he has not said what it was, he certainly has yet to call it terrorism. We need a 3 year investigation into this!
..counter-terrorism.. the best way to stop the growth of terrorism is to give the locals aid and a stake in doing so
 
was the veitnam war a great idea?

was it cool with you for the country to draft people at 18 for war but not allow them to vote until they were 21?


vietnam was worth protesting idiot


anyone on the left who avoided the draft were standing for what they believed in idiot.

the peole who backed that war and then BOUGHT themsleves out of fighting are fucking evil.



if you cant see that then Ill just have to assume none of you russians have any real morals

Besides LBJ and all his democrat supporters in congress that allowed him to escalate the war, bomb Hanoi and send in more and more troops
...who backed the Vietnam war ?
 
Back
Top