Cancel 2020.1
Canceled
That doesn't even make sense.
If I say "they shouldn't" it means I think they probably will.
Yikes.
Why I prefer Trader Trump not be impeached.
- Thread starter Jarod
- Start date
That doesn't even make sense.
If I say "they shouldn't" it means I think they probably will.
Yikes.
Teflon Don
I'm back baby
I smell capitulation
Teflon Don
I'm back baby
What crimes did you commit leading to said “sentence”?
Will they?
That's easy for you to say when your not the minority.
What if it's you're kid being shot down in the street, or taken away from you and put in cages, or being denied healthcare and food?
Minorities have always been the pawn in this game in America. Haven't we sacrificed enough?
Progress doesn't have to take 400+ years. The time is now.
Teflon Don
I'm back baby
Really?
Someone gave Acosta the bird? Holy fuck!!!!!!
Oddly you remain silent about the PHYSICAL attacks on Trump supporters
What do you think is worse? Acosta being flipped the bird or Scalise being shot by a lefty?
Teflon Don
I'm back baby
That is just Jarods white privilege shining through. He knows he won’t suffer like your people. Do not let him off the hook
STFU. YOU are the problem.
Look at the Russian Revolution. I am not promoting Communism for America here, but hear me out.
Things were bad in Russia in the early 1900's, and that part of the world, major abuses were taken out against the poor by the Czars, the underclass was severely abused. A cultural movement began, and it was an idealistic view of a future utopia. The early stages were idealistic, peaceful, and focused on cultural change. It was working, but VERY slowly. People were waking up to the evils of the imperialistic system under which they were suffering. Even the wealthy and powerful were taking part in this intellectual "revolution".
Then came the Bulshivicks. They took the roots of this intellectual and peaceful movement and seized it to move forward with a selfish political agenda to take power. Some Bulschivicks might have been noble but they were infected with power hungry individuals. The movement used the cultural awakening and demanded progress happen NOW, they accused those who wanted a peaceful natural awakening and change of being in bed with the Czar's, they took ahold of nationalism and began to promote violent intimidate action. The sour result was not progress but the USSR that did not have a national buy-in from the people because they were not ready to craft lasting and intelligent change. Sure, if they had taken their time and waited for the cultural revolution instead of forcing a violent one, people would have suffered while waiting for all of culture to catch up... but it would have been better when the change happened. The Czar's days were numbered, but by forcing with violence that system's end, they were not ready to craft a healthy replacement.
Things were bad in Russia in the early 1900's, and that part of the world, major abuses were taken out against the poor by the Czars, the underclass was severely abused. A cultural movement began, and it was an idealistic view of a future utopia. The early stages were idealistic, peaceful, and focused on cultural change. It was working, but VERY slowly. People were waking up to the evils of the imperialistic system under which they were suffering. Even the wealthy and powerful were taking part in this intellectual "revolution".
Then came the Bulshivicks. They took the roots of this intellectual and peaceful movement and seized it to move forward with a selfish political agenda to take power. Some Bulschivicks might have been noble but they were infected with power hungry individuals. The movement used the cultural awakening and demanded progress happen NOW, they accused those who wanted a peaceful natural awakening and change of being in bed with the Czar's, they took ahold of nationalism and began to promote violent intimidate action. The sour result was not progress but the USSR that did not have a national buy-in from the people because they were not ready to craft lasting and intelligent change. Sure, if they had taken their time and waited for the cultural revolution instead of forcing a violent one, people would have suffered while waiting for all of culture to catch up... but it would have been better when the change happened. The Czar's days were numbered, but by forcing with violence that system's end, they were not ready to craft a healthy replacement.
It makes perfect sense if you were being honest. So you just say things for the sake of saying them?
Even after Rump is gone, we have to live with this dejected minority. What we do now, will affect how hard that is.
An honest hate filled leftist with an agenda. 
It survived Obamunism; it will survive the efforts by the left to destroy it as long as American voters get it and marginalize the Democratic Party of the Jackass.
Cancel 2020.1
Canceled
It's really hard to believe that I have to try to explain this. Dems, for the most part, continue to talk about and pursue impeachment. I say "they shouldn't pursue this and should stop talking about it."
And you say that this means I think they would NOT make it a priority if they win in November.
I mean, I can't make this stuff up.
There are lot of Americans who still believe in the republican party.
Getting rid of dump will amount to a hill of beans when it's the GOPigs and their ideology, agenda and racist issues that is the problem.
Americans need to stand up and fight back and stop saying it takes time.........its been 400+ years. I'm just saying.
Getting rid of dump will amount to a hill of beans when it's the GOPigs and their ideology, agenda and racist issues that is the problem.
Americans need to stand up and fight back and stop saying it takes time.........its been 400+ years. I'm just saying.
The post he was responding was a lunatic rant. Dunce.
Fuck them. Treat them like America treat minorities.
Why are they entitled to a seat at the table?
So you liberals are all for obstructing now? I just want it to be clear when a Democrat finally figures out how to win.
One thing I can say about the last 18 months, is that Republican's affinity for racism and authoritarianism, and disdain for democracy has been laid bare.
I used to evoke howls of protest from the Rightwing when I mentioned their party embraced racists, and cherished authoritarianism.
They do not even bother to deny it now.
What we are seeing is that rightwing white people - largely because of racial resentment, xenophobia, and perceived loss of status - are embracing authoritarianism as their panacea....and rejecting democracy.
I never thought I would actually see that in the United States.