Why does Trump need a 90 day travel ban when its been 4 months?

The idea here is to get some specific time set aside for all the involved agencies here to get common instructions and to pull together a working strategy for super vetting entrants from countries with little to absolutely no proper vetting procedures and provisions of proper paperwork and identification.
 
Guille said:
The 3 year vetting process. That sounds fucking awesome. Explain how that's going to work.
Click to expand...

Oh, you mean you haven't done the research for your opinion? OKAY.

http://time.com/4116619/syrian-refugees-screening-process/

How do we know the refugees aren't terrorists?

Every refugee goes through an intensive vetting process, but the precautions are increased for Syrians. Multiple law enforcement, intelligence and security agencies perform "the most rigorous screening of any traveler to the U.S.," says a senior administration official. Among the agencies involved are the State Department, the FBI's Terrorist Screening Center, the Department of Defense and the Department of Homeland Security. A DHS officer conducts in-person interviews with every applicant. Biometric information such as fingerprints are collected and matched against criminal databases. Biographical information such as past visa applications are scrutinized to ensure the applicant's story coheres.

What percentage of applicants "pass" the screening process?

Just over 50%.

How long does the whole process take?

Eighteen to 24 months on average.
Click to expand...
 
Amadeus said:
There's like a one in a four billion chance that you'd be killed by a Syrian refugee.

so-youre-telling-me-theres-a-chance.jpg
Click to expand...

But there is a 99.9% chance you would get killed by a Mooslim.
 
When you have millions of people with nothing but what they are wearing and a few private belongings fleeing war ravaged countries rife with terror, and the terrorists who look like the refugees,
and committed to their jihad against the west. It is STUPID not to vet them. the degree of vetting is the issue. And is Trumps call, not some liberal judge sitting on the 9th district playing to his ideals.

Look, all it is going to take is a bad player to get through and hurt people and this is all fixed. And liberals will once again be made the fools they are.
Lets just hope ground zero is San Fran Cisco, or one of the other hot beds for liberal activism. maybe UC Berkley
 
Deplorable Me said:
Born from Libyan jihadis.

Defend those little darlin' Mooslims, Americans had enough after 8 years of terrorist loving garbage.

Keep them out.
Click to expand...

Born from Libyan refugees.

But, I see you adhere to the "sins of the father" bullshit? When did your people get here, pally boy? Shoulda kept them out of whatever sewer you came from.
 
Amadeus said:
Maybe I'm missing something, but why does Trump need a 90 day travel ban when it's been well over 90 days since since he proposed it? Seems to me, the time he needed to figure out immigration policy has elapsed.

View attachment 4237
Click to expand...

Good point.

The travel ban is stupid.

Where is his plan for infrastructure? He promised huge infrastructure goals and has spent his time piddling away on a stupid travel ban.
 
Getin the ring said:
And is Trumps call, not some liberal judge sitting on the 9th district playing to his ideals.
Click to expand...

And, it will be stupid for Ginsberg not to recuse herself. She publicly spouted off her hatred of Trump about a year ago. No way she should be allowed to give an opinion regarding Trump on anything he said a year ago.
 
Yaya said:
Good point.

The travel ban is stupid.

Where is his plan for infrastructure? He promised huge infrastructure goals and has spent his time piddling away on a stupid travel ban.
Click to expand...

"piddling away on a stupid travel ban"?
you mean deflecting bogus conspiracy theories.
But you know truth be told Trump is forging ahead, he has done more first 100 days than any President, just not being reported, which is fine with us, progress needs believers, not cheerleaders
 
Stretch said:
And, it will be stupid for Ginsberg not to recuse herself. She publicly spouted off her hatred of Trump about a year ago. No way she should be allowed to give an opinion regarding Trump on anything he said a year ago.
Click to expand...
good point, maybe WH lawyers will ask for Ginsburg to step aside on this one.
Dems asked Sessions, and Devin Nunez to recuse themselves from opining or otherwise being involved in matters due to past public displays of partisanship
 
Getin the ring said:
"piddling away on a stupid travel ban"?
you mean deflecting bogus conspiracy theories.
But you know truth be told Trump is forging ahead, he has done more first 100 days than any President, just not being reported, which is fine with us, progress needs believers, not cheerleaders
Click to expand...

No he hasn't. Tell me, why is the travel ban more important than his infrastructure plan? There have been no attacks without his ban and he could have been spending time on his infrastructure plan.
 
Stretch said:
The idea here is to get some specific time set aside for all the involved agencies here to get common instructions and to pull together a working strategy for super vetting entrants from countries with little to absolutely no proper vetting procedures and provisions of proper paperwork and identification.
Click to expand...

Common instructions from Orangetweet and his administration? Pffffft!
 
Getin the ring said:
"piddling away on a stupid travel ban"?
you mean deflecting bogus conspiracy theories.
But you know truth be told Trump is forging ahead, he has done more first 100 days than any President, just not being reported, which is fine with us, progress needs believers, not cheerleaders
Click to expand...

Damn, you are funny!
 
Deplorable Me said:
Well obviously it wasn't long enough, they're still at it. We need to be proactive and not wait to take action until people get killed.

And to think Hillary campaigned on bringing 800k Syrians over......dumb.
Click to expand...
Why wasn't it long enough? The time was supposed to be for a program of increased scrutiny of everyone entering the country. We're 4 months past, and nothing has been done to put forth new plans to do so.

I think we can agree that trump is simply still in campaign mode, and really isn't interested in the creation of any 'doctrine' of any kind.
 
Getin the ring said:
so we wait until Americans die on our soil. THEN apply the ban?

Typical liberal logic, never thinking ahead

And the reason we still need a ban more than 90 days out is that Trump had intended on first issuing a 90 day ban and then extending it IF need be moving forward.

You can explain things to liberals but can't make them think for themselves it seems
Click to expand...
The reason 'you' think we still need a ban, is due to the inability of this administration to accomplish anything. trump simply squawks his tourette's like utterings in the wee hours of the morning, and his entire staff spends a week cleaning up his mess.
 
Stretch said:
The idea here is to get some specific time set aside for all the involved agencies here to get common instructions and to pull together a working strategy for super vetting entrants from countries with little to absolutely no proper vetting procedures and provisions of proper paperwork and identification.
Click to expand...
So why haven't they done that from day one?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top