Why does Trump need a 90 day travel ban when its been 4 months?

Irish said:
Why were libs freaking out so much, over a 90 day ban? Better question.
Click to expand...

Stupid, diversionary question. Trump said he needed 90 days to figure out the vetting process. It's been much more and he still needs the same time? Bullshit.

Once again, he was lying and the Trumptards bought it.
 
Getin the ring said:
so we wait until Americans die on our soil. THEN apply the ban?

Typical liberal logic, never thinking ahead

And the reason we still need a ban more than 90 days out is that Trump had intended on first issuing a 90 day ban and then extending it IF need be moving forward.

You can explain things to liberals but can't make them think for themselves it seems
Click to expand...

That's why they lost.
 
domer76 said:
Stupid, diversionary question. Trump said he needed 90 days to figure out the vetting process. It's been much more and he still needs the same time? Bullshit.

Once again, he was lying and the Trumptards bought it.
Click to expand...

We need a permanent vetting process and travel ban.
 
Getin the ring said:
so we wait until Americans die on our soil. THEN apply the ban?

Typical liberal logic, never thinking ahead

And the reason we still need a ban more than 90 days out is that Trump had intended on first issuing a 90 day ban and then extending it IF need be moving forward.

You can explain things to liberals but can't make them think for themselves it seems
Click to expand...

lol

There was no IF about it.
 
There's like a one in a four billion chance that you'd be killed by a Syrian refugee.

so-youre-telling-me-theres-a-chance.jpg
 
Guille said:
And...you agree with their assessment?
Click to expand...

I acknowledge their assessment. I don't base my opinions on gut instinct. At some point, there has to be some semblance of truth out there. Where should I look for evidence when I don't have the resources to personally conduct a study that calculates statistical probabilities?
 
Amadeus said:
I acknowledge their assessment. I don't base my opinions on gut instinct. At some point, there has to be some semblance of truth out there. Where should I look for evidence when I don't have the resources to personally conduct a study that calculates statistical probabilities?
Click to expand...

Calculate Germany for me. That blows them out of the water right away. Or France. Or...let's talk about why the migration is happening in the first place. That piece you linked to doesn't seem to want to address that at all. Apologism dressed up as math isn't really math.
 
there is no way to effectively vet travelers from Libya -it's 3 governments,and full of refugees.
Syria is much the same
 
Guille said:
Calculate Germany for me. That blows them out of the water right away. Or France.
Click to expand...

America doesn't have ghettos and slums where they keep their immigrants.

Or...let's talk about why the migration is happening in the first place.
Click to expand...

We can talk about Syria, and how Putin and Assad have created and greatly exaggerated the refugee problem.

That piece you linked to doesn't seem to want to address that at all. Apologism dressed up as math isn't really math.
Click to expand...

Apologies for what?
 
Amadeus said:
America doesn't have ghettos and slums where they keep their immigrants.



We can talk about Syria, and how Putin and Assad have created and greatly exaggerated the refugee problem.



Apologies for what?
Click to expand...

So you acknowledge that certain factors should be taken into account. That's a start.

The author of that piece needs to stop being an apologist for refugees and the inordinately high crime rate and violence that follows them.
 
One of the things I remember from my time is the fact that some of the baddest dudes in Al Qaeda were Libyan,” he said, citing a study of seized Qaeda personnel files by the Combating Terrorism Center at West Point, showing that as far back as 2007, almost 20 percent of the terrorist group’s fighters in Iraq were from Libya.

“When I looked at the Islamic State, the same thing was happening,” said Mr. Colquhoun, who now runs Neon Century, a corporate intelligence consultancy in London. “They were the most hard-core, the most violent — the ones always willing to go to extremes when others were not. The Libyans represented the elite troops, and clearly ISIS capitalized on this.”
Click to expand...
what i'm trying to figure out is if they knew about this (Manchester bomber)
why even let him back in the country?
 
Guille said:
The author of that piece needs to stop being an apologist for refugees and the inordinately high crime rate and violence that follows them.
Click to expand...

Since illegal immigrants are statically less likely to commit crimes than the average American, I am not very concerned with inordinately high crime as the result Syrian immigrants who go through an intense 3-year vetting process.

Nothing is 100%, and if you're looking for 100% crime free, then block all immigration. Also prevent Americans from reproducing.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top