Why do Dems suport building the fence but not the wall?

anatta

100% recycled karma
fence is physical barrier that is somewhat effective
( except apparently from that 19 year old pregnant woman who scaled it)

Shumer/Pelosi= "impractical" -it's not .
it's not the exact same design across the entire border due to geology but it's built to standards that scaling even with a rope is ineffective.

Pelosi = "it's immoral" - it's not.
There is nothing moral about desperados and coyotes smuggling in trains of people -
many carrying drugs across the border to die in the desert, or enter the USA illegally.

It's physically effective, cost effective and in long stretches of the border the best tool for border security.

Supporting a fence but not a wall is hypocritical politics
 
fence is physical barrier that is somewhat effective
( except apparently from that 19 year old pregnant woman who scaled it)

Shumer/Pelosi= "impractical" -it's not .
it's not the exact same design across the entire border due to geology but it's built to standards that scaling even with a rope is ineffective.

Pelosi = "it's immoral" - it's not.
There is nothing moral about desperados and coyotes smuggling in trains of people -
many carrying drugs across the border to die in the desert, or enter the USA illegally.

It's physically effective, cost effective and in long stretches of the border the best tool for border security.

Supporting a fence but not a wall is hypocritical politics


We have 21,000 border patrol agents since Obama was in office.. Isn't that about 10.5 agents per mile of border?
 
It's no surprise that minorities that usually vote for liberal Democrats oppose the wall.

Ice Cube: Trump’s Border Wall Is ‘Pathetic’

The rapper also called a border wall “dumb” and “a waste of money.”

You'd think he'd be for it since some of his people would get the jobs to construct the border wall.

https://www.breitbart.com/entertain...pathetic-his-administration-is-going-to-jail/


He's correct and evidently smarter than you.. We have 10.5 border patrol agents per mile of border. That's one border patrol agent for every 503 feet of border.
 
He's correct and evidently smarter than you.. We have 10.5 border patrol agents per mile of border. That's one border patrol agent for every 503 feet of border.

Do you know that each agent does not work 24/7 - 365? Looking at your math, ... apparrntly not. :palm:
 
Don't you think 21,000 people can secure 2,000 miles of border?
apparently not. 51,000 arrests last month -how many got thru with that extraordinary number?
They are literally flooding the border.

And once they cross they DO NOT get deported! They know to claim asylum,
Trump says he is stopping catch and release- but our laws require he do. we can't process that fast.

The asylum laws are screwed up. Did it look to you like CHuck and Nancy were concerned about that?
Chuck was laughing at the whole thing - it's just a political game to him.
Once Trump said he's own the shutdown, that was all he cared about. not border security

NY and CA being sanctuary states as well -they do not care about illegals and shelter illegal criminals
 
080411-border-fence-vmed-2p.grid-4x2.jpg

Supervisory Border Patrol Agent Victor Guzman points out a cut mark on the border fence west of Columbus, New Mexico, on Wednesday. Guzman, who has worked in the area for nearly a decade, said agents have found holes cut with torches and axes.
http://www.nbcnews.com/id/24070197/...ssers-use-torches-bungees-fence/#.XBD2geJ7mM9
...
 
So divide by three shifts.. That means there is 1500 feet of border for every shift. LOLOL. THINK.

What? ... no holidays? ... no sick days? ... no vacation days? ... no maternity leave? You are a slave master. :palm:
 
fence is physical barrier that is somewhat effective
( except apparently from that 19 year old pregnant woman who scaled it)

Shumer/Pelosi= "impractical" -it's not .
it's not the exact same design across the entire border due to geology but it's built to standards that scaling even with a rope is ineffective.

Pelosi = "it's immoral" - it's not.
There is nothing moral about desperados and coyotes smuggling in trains of people -
many carrying drugs across the border to die in the desert, or enter the USA illegally.

It's physically effective, cost effective and in long stretches of the border the best tool for border security.

Supporting a fence but not a wall is hypocritical politics

It's only hypocritical if you believe they're sincere about wanting to build a fence. I think they're just trolling Trump.
 
It's only hypocritical if you believe they're sincere about wanting to build a fence. I think they're just trolling Trump.
I honestly think they do not want to give Trump "his wall"(which Pelosi ascribes to "manhood" issues by Trump)
because it would be a political win for Trump.

Afterall they want Mueller to throw him out. By any means possible. It's all about politics.
That was pretty clear in the Oval Office yesterday. Screw border security. get Trump!
 
I honestly think they do not want to give Trump "his wall"(which Pelosi ascribes to "manhood" issues by Trump)
because it would be a political win for Trump.

Afterall they want Mueller to throw him out. By any means possible. It's all about politics.
That was pretty clear in the Oval Office yesterday. Screw border security. get Trump!

^^^^
That's not just opinion ... IT IS FACT.

:thumbsup:
 
An enhanced, tall fence like we have in some sections (and Trump briefly tried declaring "the first part of the wall") is pretty much just as effective realistically and much cheaper. Eventually the entire fence pretty much is going to be upgraded to those standards, this was long planned. The reinforced concrete wall of Trump's dreams just isn't going to happen. Even in Israel where they have some sections of tall, concrete wall, that's hardly over the entire length of the barrier and much of it is fencing because it would be impractical to do the entire thing in concrete.
 
Back
Top