Why did Trump only attack the woman?

Stretch said:
Zelenski also wrote that he did not have faith in her; concerned with her loyalty to the old regime.
Click to expand...

And we must always take the opinions of a foreign leader as preferable gospel over those of our own guys, all of whom believe that Ms. Yovanovich was an excellent State Dept. employee and an outstanding diplomatic representative of the U.S. to other nations.
 
Micawber said:
Trump is now attacking the next female witness. Trump has issues with women that causes him to abuse them.
Click to expand...

Some kind of mommy syndrome. His emotional and personal development stalled when he was around 13 or 14. I bet when he was a teenager girls thought he was disgusting just as we do now.
 
Originally Posted by Into the Night
No, dude. She works in the State Department. That is under the Executive branch of government: Donald Trump. He can fire anyone he wishes, and for any reason.


I know you aren't a lawyer and you probably think every disclaimer you have read is legal because you are not smart, but here is a hint, they aren't all legal.

Like the employment at will thing, dummy. You can't fire an at will employee for an ILLEGAL reason.

"Your honor, I fired her because she wouldn't sell crack and turn tricks"

That's your position, MORON At will employees have rights, so your analogy holds ZERO legal water. Get a new pitcher, I'm hitting Hannity out of the park.
 
Micawber said:
Originally Posted by Into the Night
No, dude. She works in the State Department. That is under the Executive branch of government: Donald Trump. He can fire anyone he wishes, and for any reason.


I know you aren't a lawyer and you probably think every disclaimer you have read is legal because you are not smart, but here is a hint, they aren't all legal.

Like the employment at will thing, dummy. You can't fire an at will employee for an ILLEGAL reason.

"Your honor, I fired her because she wouldn't sell crack and turn tricks"

That's your position, MORON At will employees have rights, so your analogy holds ZERO legal water. Get a new pitcher, I'm hitting Hannity out of the park.
Click to expand...

Don't federal employees have an entire set of rules that must be followed before they can be terminated from employment? At least, that's what I've always heard our union-hating CEO-ass-kissing Reichwing friends say. That claim is one of the reasons why government is evil, in their opinion.
 
ThatOwlWoman said:
Some kind of mommy syndrome. His emotional and personal development stalled when he was around 13 or 14. I bet when he was a teenager girls thought he was disgusting just as we do now.
Click to expand...

His syndromes run the gamut of all Greco Roman tragedy, including the oedipal thingy
 
Into the Night said:
No, dude. She works in the State Department. That is under the Executive branch of government: Donald Trump. He can fire anyone he wishes, and for any reason.
Click to expand...

Sure can, Gboy. What you morons won’t respond to is why he needed to intimidate, smear and attack her.
 
Into the Night said:
No. One is a subset of the other. Misogymy is a form of racism. It is a compositional error fallacy involving people as the class and a genetic trait as the property...the very definition of racism.
Click to expand...

Gender and race are two different animals. Misogyny and racism are both biases but one doesn't equal the other.
 
ThatOwlWoman said:
Some kind of mommy syndrome. His emotional and personal development stalled when he was around 13 or 14. I bet when he was a teenager girls thought he was disgusting just as we do now.
Click to expand...

His latest is Pence's assistant, Jennifer Williams. And Pence didn't defend her because he's a spineless wuss.
 
Micawber said:
Originally Posted by Into the Night
No, dude. She works in the State Department. That is under the Executive branch of government: Donald Trump. He can fire anyone he wishes, and for any reason.


I know you aren't a lawyer and you probably think every disclaimer you have read is legal because you are not smart, but here is a hint, they aren't all legal.

Like the employment at will thing, dummy. You can't fire an at will employee for an ILLEGAL reason.

"Your honor, I fired her because she wouldn't sell crack and turn tricks"

That's your position, MORON At will employees have rights, so your analogy holds ZERO legal water. Get a new pitcher, I'm hitting Hannity out of the park.
Click to expand...

He doesn't need to specify a reason, dummy.
 
ThatOwlWoman said:
Don't federal employees have an entire set of rules that must be followed before they can be terminated from employment? At least, that's what I've always heard our union-hating CEO-ass-kissing Reichwing friends say. That claim is one of the reasons why government is evil, in their opinion.
Click to expand...

In the end? Not really.

The 'rules' you refer to are from the federal managers themselves usually by negotiating with unions. Trump can fire anyone in the Executive branch he wants for any reason he wants. He doesn't even have to give a reason.
 
ThatOwlWoman said:
That's pretty disturbing. But you know what bothers me the most? This kind of misogynist nastiness is okay with a way-too-large segment of his base.
Click to expand...

I agree. Makes me wonder if they always thought this way but were afraid to speak about it until trump made it okay. It especially bothers me when trump women go after other women.
 
christiefan915 said:
I agree. Makes me wonder if they always thought this way but were afraid to speak about it until trump made it okay. It especially bothers me when trump women go after other women.
Click to expand...

Beyond a doubt Trump has made it cool to be crass. I know what you mean about the #PickMe conservative girls. We've seen plenty of that toadying behavior from the ones here.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top