Why did Trump only attack the woman?

Yes it does, hotshot. Gender is a part of one's genetic makeup.

That's not his argument. He's claiming gender and race are the same thing. The correct way to state it is gender and race are part of one's genetic make-up but they are two different elements.
 
Three public witnesses to far. He only bullied by derogatory tweetstorm the female.
They all laid bricks for his cell. Seems odd. I'm confounded.

Any good explanations for this disparity?:thinking:

I thought there was no difference between men and women?
 
That's not his argument.
Yes, it is. Re-read his posts #42 and #58...

He's claiming gender and race are the same thing.
Re-read his posts #42 and #58. He is claiming that gender is a subset of race, that gender is a race. This is true because misogyny is a specific form of "a compositional error involving people as the class and a genetic trait as the property", aka 'racism'. Gender happens to be a part of one's genetic makeup. Race does not exclusively refer to skin color.

The correct way to state it is gender and race are part of one's genetic make-up but they are two different elements.
A whole cannot be a part of the whole; it already IS the whole. Gender is a subset of race. Skin color is a subset of race. Race includes all of one's genetic makeup (not just skin color).
 
Last edited:
Three public witnesses to far. He only bullied by derogatory tweetstorm the female.
They all laid bricks for his cell. Seems odd. I'm confounded.

Any good explanations for this disparity?:thinking:

Schiff's a WOMAN??? Who knew. Ugly bitch at that....
 
That's not his argument. He's claiming gender and race are the same thing. The correct way to state it is gender and race are part of one's genetic make-up but they are two different elements.

In case you haven't notice, there is a female race and a male race. There are, of course, a few oddballs, but they are oddballs by choice. They are each born one or the other. It's not just plumbing differences either.
 
In the end? Not really.

The 'rules' you refer to are from the federal managers themselves usually by negotiating with unions. Trump can fire anyone in the Executive branch he wants for any reason he wants. He doesn't even have to give a reason.

That doesn't mean they can't fight back. Especially after trump, Ghouliani and their henchmen conducted a smear campaign against her. She ought to sue for slander and libel.
 
Yes, it is. Re-read his posts #42 and #58...

Re-read his posts #42 and #58. He is claiming that gender is a subset of race, that gender is a race. This is true because misogyny is a specific form of "a compositional error involving people as the class and a genetic trait as the property", aka 'racism'. Gender happens to be a part of one's genetic makeup. Race does not exclusively refer to skin color.

A whole cannot be a part of the whole; it already IS the whole. Gender is a subset of race. Skin color is a subset of race. Race includes all of one's genetic makeup (not just skin color).

I'm still waiting for a citation "that gender is a race." If you can't provide one, there's no point in continuing this.
 
Yes it does. Gender is a product of genetics. It is a genetic trait, just like eye color is.

Only in reptiles is gender not determined by genetics. Are you claiming to be a reptile?

You're straying far from the point. I'm challenging this assertion: "He is claiming that gender is a subset of race, that gender is a race."

If you don't have anything, just say so.
 
In case you haven't notice, there is a female race and a male race. There are, of course, a few oddballs, but they are oddballs by choice. They are each born one or the other. It's not just plumbing differences either.

Gender, not race. How about posting the book, paper, treatise, peer-reviewed article or whatever you got this from.
 
Back
Top