Here is the basic facts. Hillary is winning by the absolute slimmest of margins, statistically, it is insignificant. We are talking 1/10th of 1%. Paltry numbers.
I will use liberals own words and own beliefs, I will accept what they have been saying for the past year at face value, and it is this:
1) Hillary Clinton is the most qualified, most experienced, most capable candidate the nation has ever had. She helped needy children, she was first lady, she was a senator, and secretary of state. She had 30 years of public service. She had an impeccable ground game, a rockstar legacy name, extreme public recognition, everyone in the DNC owed her favors. She was the
A+ candidate. You said it yourselves. Democrats could not have a better person running for office. This is what you all said.
Concurrently:
2) Donald Trump is the anti-christ. He is mean, he is a bully. He made fun of a handicapped reporter. He made fun of war veteran john mccain and picked a fight with the grieving father Khan. He made fun of women's menstrual cycles, called a miss america contestant miss piggy, he had women lining up claiming they were sexually assaulted by him. He called mexicans rapists, called for a ban of muslims. He talked about grabbing women by the pussy. He was the most evil, racist, xenophobic, fascist, hitler-esque candidate ever put forth by the republicans. He was a man that divided his own party, with #nevertrumpers popping up, former presidential candidates calling him a fraud and a phony. By every measure, you claimed Trump was the biggest joke of a candidate the republicans ever put forth. See the liberal reaction here just one year ago to get a sense of the level of disrespect you had for trump:
Liberals, by their own words and beliefs have declared they had an "A+" candidate vs. the Republicans "F" candidate. The match could not be anymore unequal.
And even with all that, liberals could only win the popular vote by 1/10th of 1%.
That is fucking pathetic
That is a rebuke, whether you want to admit it or not, and I will elaborate why.
What happens the next time republicans put forth a candiate that uses the same dog whistle politics, but doesn't grab women by the pussy, and doesn't insult the father of dead kids? What happens when they don't nominate someone that gets into twitter wars - in short, what happens when republicans nominate a more polished 'C' level candidate?
If your A+ candidate can only win by 1/10th of 1% of the popular vote (while still losing where it counts, mind you.. lest we forget), then what happens the next time you don't have the most qualified and experienced person running for office? (Because you do realize, candidates like that don't come around very often, right)?
If you can't even win the electoral college with your A+ vs. the Republicans F, and can only have the absolute infestessmail of victories in the popular margin, what happens with your B vs. a republican F?
or your C vs. a Republican B?
Or your B vs. a Republican B?
Liberals got fucking wrecked. If you can't even win with your best vs. your opponents worst, then you can't fucking win, period.
But hey! You won the popular vote! Give yourselves a pat on the back!
....and whom leftists all predicted would win by a landslide. Moron.
