Legion Troll
A fine upstanding poster
Failin' Palin. Please pick her, deadbeat Don!
i still like gingrich. The only thing i am sure of is it will not be someone who has already lost in the repub primary. The stigma of loser is still too fresh.
i am but I was referring to the Town in New York where the Clintons currently reside.
Probably not, but she would garner a lot of votes.You think she would do it? I seriously doubt it.
I think you overestimate her popularity. Condi is still considered one of the major neocon architects of immoral war in Iraq. I wouldn't vote for for dog catcher.Probably not, but she would garner a lot of votes.
Sent from my Lenovo K50-t5 using Tapatalk
I think you overestimate her popularity. Condi is still considered one of the major neocon architects of immoral war in Iraq. I wouldn't vote for for dog catcher.
Maybe so, but that was a while back now and she was anywhere near as crazy as Cheney, Wolfowitz and Rumsfeld.I think you overestimate her popularity. Condi is still considered one of the major neocon architects of immoral war in Iraq. I wouldn't vote for for dog catcher.
He may be a decent pick (considering the choices~rather those that would stoop so low as to put their rep on the line for lost cause w/ a LOZER) but is he really assKisser enough to kowtow to the donny on every whim &/or childish fit??? I don't think so but the guy is pretty desperate for attention..i still like gingrich. The only thing i am sure of is it will not be someone who has already lost in the repub primary. The stigma of loser is still too fresh.
Condi Rice has never been in the running. We want people like that and the bushes in the neoconservative wing of the republican party to go back to the democrats where all globalists belong.
Yes she was. She may not have been as vocal as those three but she played as big a roll in beating the drums for war. She would be savaged on her record on Iraq and what a gross failure she was as National Security Advisor and how she shares a substantial responsibility for creating the power vacuum that is responsible for the current instability in the Middle East. Sarah Palin would be a better choice.Maybe so, but that was a while back now and she was anywhere near as crazy as Cheney, Wolfowitz and Rumsfeld.
Sent from my Lenovo K50-t5 using Tapatalk
In the 1970s, Gingrich taught history and geography at the University of West Georgia. During this period he ran twice (1974 and 1976) for the United States House of Representatives.
He lost both times.
The poor showing by Republicans in the 1998 Congressional elections, a reprimand from the House for Gingrich's ethics violation, and pressure from Republican colleagues caused Gingrich's resignation from the speakership on November 6, 1998, followed by his outright resignation from the House on January 3, 1999.
He's a quitter.
In May 2011, he announced his campaign for the Republican presidential nomination. On May 2, 2012, Gingrich ended his presidential campaign.
He's a three-time loser.
He has been married three times, with the first two marriages ending in affairs and divorce.
Deadbeat Don is ahead by one.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newt_Gingrich
Yes she was. She may not have been as vocal as those three but she played as big a roll in beating the drums for war. She would be savaged on her record on Iraq and what a gross failure she was as National Security Advisor and how she shares a substantial responsibility for creating the power vacuum that is responsible for the current instability in the Middle East. Sarah Palin would be a better choice.
Gingrich is a loser.
He would be perfect for the losing Trump ticket.
Yes she was. She may not have been as vocal as those three but she played as big a roll in beating the drums for war. She would be savaged on her record on Iraq and what a gross failure she was as National Security Advisor and how she shares a substantial responsibility for creating the power vacuum that is responsible for the current instability in the Middle East. Sarah Palin would be a better choice.
I think the more appropriate question is, who would accept?
Trump hates losers.
Not looking for a waitress, looking for smart and capable.