Where are the Zimmerman supporters now?

Those are not the jury instructions; that is a very small part of the jury's instructions: context.

Then what's stopping you from posting them and a link; but make sure it's to a verifiable site and not just some liberal "wishing" blog?
 
Here is a link to the full instructions; I don't know the site, but the instructions are correct: link

I had already seen this, before my post; but even your link does not support the complaint by Christie that the two cases being discussed are somehow related by the "stand your ground" law?
 
I had already seen this, before my post; but even your link does not support the complaint by Christie that the two cases being discussed are somehow related by the "stand your ground" law?

I presume you have statements from all the jurors to make a blanket statement? This was not about stand your ground; the only place you heard that was from the media; the defense didn't use it as they had a better chance with reasonable doubt and 2nd degree murder, and it worked.
 
Then what's stopping you from posting them and a link; but make sure it's to a verifiable site and not just some liberal "wishing" blog?

I think you misunderstand my position: Zimmerman should never have been indicted as there was not probable cause. The original prosecutor had that right before the state stepped in. You don't get your ass handed to you the way the prosecutor did at the trial with believable probable cause.
 
There was not probable cause??????????? Insanely ridiculous. If Zimmerman had been black, he would have been immediately arrested, and undoubtedly "rough handled". Are you serious? You, and adult, and known by the police force, shoot an unarmed teen, "dead", in supposed "self defense", and given the 911 call, you better bet your ass there was probable cause. I know you think there is 2 and six kinds of justice, and there actually "is"....that doesn't mean that it is right.
 
I presume you have statements from all the jurors to make a blanket statement? This was not about stand your ground; the only place you heard that was from the media; the defense didn't use it as they had a better chance with reasonable doubt and 2nd degree murder, and it worked.

I've never said it was about "stand your ground".
Christie is the one you need to be having this conversation with; because she's the idiot who tried to make the comparison.
 
I think you misunderstand my position: Zimmerman should never have been indicted as there was not probable cause. The original prosecutor had that right before the state stepped in. You don't get your ass handed to you the way the prosecutor did at the trial with believable probable cause.

Then I'm not sure as to why you're questioning me about this, seeing as how I've never suggested it was and the chronology of the posts will show that it's Christie who's having the hissy fit.
 
There was not probable cause??????????? Insanely ridiculous. If Zimmerman had been black, he would have been immediately arrested, and undoubtedly "rough handled". Are you serious? You, and adult, and known by the police force, shoot an unarmed teen, "dead", in supposed "self defense", and given the 911 call, you better bet your ass there was probable cause. I know you think there is 2 and six kinds of justice, and there actually "is"....that doesn't mean that it is right.

<handing Poet a napkin>
You've got a little tear, in the corner of your left eye
 
So, reality cannot dent your insistence that it isn't "right" because she unsuccessfully claimed something that Zimmerman didn't claim at all and you therefore think the NRA is at fault?

What drives people crazy is emotive nonsense in place of intelligent conversation and the attempt to say another is racist when they point out inconvenient reality.
That's a pretty hypocritical comment and is projection on your behalf. Why do you and the other Zimmy defenders are either oddly quiet or keep making comments, as you have, that are totally irrelevant to my point. Your hung up on what a court decided. I never brought that up and it has absolutely nothing to do with the point I have made. Why do you and the other Zimmy supporters refuse to support and defend this woman and why won't you recognize this GLARING inconsistency? Why do you and the other Zimmy defenders refuse to defend her?

If Grind or Billy defend her actions I'll give them props. as to the others who keep ruining from this basic question or who evade by trying to distract with irrelevant comments , as you have, I can only assume your hypocrites, bigots, or both.
 
That's a pretty hypocritical comment and is projection on your behalf. Why do you and the other Zimmy defenders are either oddly quiet or keep making comments, as you have, that are totally irrelevant to my point. Your hung up on what a court decided. I never brought that up and it has absolutely nothing to do with the point I have made. Why do you and the other Zimmy supporters refuse to support and defend this woman and why won't you recognize this GLARING inconsistency? Why do you and the other Zimmy defenders refuse to defend her?

If Grind or Billy defend her actions I'll give them props. as to the others who keep ruining from this basic question or who evade by trying to distract with irrelevant comments , as you have, I can only assume your hypocrites, bigots, or both.

But it's you that are being hypocritical.
You are some how trying to equate what happened with Trayvon and Zimmerman, to the incident where the women LEFT THE HOUSE, RETRIEVED A GUN FROM HER CAR, THEN RETURNED TO THE HOUSE, AND FIRED A SHOT AT HER HUSBAND
 
Pinheads ever gonna admit that defending the 2nd Amend. and defending the "right of self defense" does not equate to dedending Zimmerman?
 
Back
Top