they one they confused the jury with in instruction.
You know the same one that put a Black woman in prison for firing a warning shot.
O wait yeah that one was because they DIDNT apply that same law to her case
Um... They didn't apply the "make my day" law on the Hispanic dude who was not convicted. Just an FYI, a "fact" so to speak.
thats completely irrelevent to my point. Why wasnt she afforded the same level of reasonabe doubt as Zimmy and why arent they defe ding her right to defend herself and how could they not be outraged at such a grossly dispropotionate sentence? Why is her case so different thar when Zimmy kills a black kid they reflexively jump to his aid but when a black woman fires a warning shot in self defense and hurts no one ther aer ok with a 20 year sentence?The problem with idiots is they can't determine that when somebody says that "the evidence will not be enough to convict" they translate that into "I support this one guy" when it really means, "if you had more evidence he may be convicted".
oh yes and if a white man had done the same thing he too would get 20 years and you would be ok with that and you beleive in Santa Clause too?You do know that Florida law specified the sentence for Ms. Alexander. Don't you, Ohioan?
Again what does this have to do with my point? Whyy this double standard by gun advocates? Why are they not rushing to her aid? Wheres the NRA?Actually, the fact is that more blacks have benefited from the law than "whites"... (Although Zimmerman didn't benefit from it at all).
http://articles.chicagotribune.com/...-20131029_1_ground-laws-blacks-ground-defense
Who benefits from the law? Actually, since poor blacks who live in high-crime urban areas are the most likely victims of crime, they are also the ones who benefit the most from stand your ground laws. The laws make it easier for would-be victims to protect themselves when the police can't arrive fast enough. Therefore, rules that make self-defense more difficult disproportionately impact blacks.
Blacks make up 16.6 percent of Florida's population but account for 31 percent of the defendants invoking the stand your ground defense. Black defendants who invoke this statute are actually acquitted 8 percentage points more frequently than whites who use this very same defense.
More at link...
Again what does this have to do with my point? Whyy this double standard by gun advocates? Why are they not rushing to her aid? Wheres the NRA?
she was black so the biased courts didn't think she had a right to protect herself
Go get the proof.
http://miamiherald.typepad.com/nake...-not-guilty-zimmerman-verdict-juror-says.html
Jury talked Stand Your Ground before not-guilty Zimmerman verdict, juror says
Read more here: http://miamiherald.typepad.com/nake...mmerman-verdict-juror-says.html#storylink=cpy
Again...your missing my point. Given the similarities why are they not publicly defendig this woman with the zeal and passion that they did for Zimmy?By protecting the law when it was under fire they ensured it was there for her to call upon. Unfortunately the evidence of the case created a different conclusion. The reality is, by a higher percentage the people who benefit from it are black, it isn't the NRA that caused this ruling by the judge.
Again...your missing my point. Given the similarities why are they not publicly defendig this woman with the zeal and passion that they did for Zimmy?
In other words you dont believe race played a role here. This is the sort of shit that drives the black people I know crazy. That you can just passively accept this given that regions well documented reputation. You wont admit that something here just dont seem right?The numbers I linked to earlier point to an entirely different conclusion.