What that crazy moonbat Palin is saying today!

Jarod said:
Actually, I belive it not only takes a "Village" to raise children. It also takes a "village" to be a profitable member of our society, and to accomplish much in this world as an adult.
Click to expand...

We need society because we arent self-sufficient. But we are seperate from the society in that we can be removed from it if we choose. Look at immigrants who never learn English (intentionally) and continue their old traditions. They choose not to integrate, and encourage their children, youth to do much the same.

The reality is that whomever the child is around the most, whomever the child respects, looks up to the most is who they will adopt their values from. So long as the parants are the primary givers and the most important to the child its ideas will reflect the parents to a degree.

The removal or parents as the primary influences in a child's life would be a detrimate to freedom and a huge step towards government indoctrination. Counter-cultures would also diminish dramatically.
 
Jarod said:
A Village is a community that looks out for and helps one another. Your first sentence defines what a village is...
Click to expand...

During the short time I lived in a city, when I was in 2nd grade I walked about 4 or 5 blocks to school. One day while walking home I found a book of matches. I tried one and it lit. I walked a little further and noticed that the grass in the ditch was high enough to burn so I tried to set it on fire. While working diligently, a car stopped and asked me what I was doing. I knew I had done something wrong, gave the guy the matches and proceeded to walk home. The man asked for my address and I told him (Mom diligently drove certain things into my head so that I still remember our address and phone numbers where ever we lived even today), stupidly thinking all the while, "I'm glad he didn't ask for my phone number." I walk on home, thinking I had gotten by with trying to do something but when I got there, mom was waiting on the porch with a section of Hot Wheel track. I never tried to light anything on fire like that again. That is my impression of "it takes a village." That was 1973 ... I'm not so sure it would work today but it did then.
 
UPDATE: Sarah Palin is still holding to the crazy wacko right-wing notion that parents are responsible for their children. She probably got this wacko idea from her Bible or something. I can't believe someone so out of touch and backward ever ran for VP, what were Republicans thinking? I know she has said some crazy shit, but this one just takes her over the edge, how can anyone take her seriously after this?
 
pisskop said:
Look at immigrants who never learn English (intentionally) and continue their old traditions. They choose not to integrate, and encourage their children, youth to do much the same.
Click to expand...

WTF are you learning in school, Village Idiot?

That is an inane statement, even from you!
 
Howey said:
WTF are you learning in school, Village Idiot?

That is an inane statement, even from you!
Click to expand...

Please tell me you're not so full of stupid you don;t know that some reject your glorious conformist culture of deepfried skittles and orgies. . .

Exactly what I said. Many immigrants purposefully avoid integration into our culture. Many raised right here in America avoid the mainstream culture encouraged by media too. Sociology 102 stuff here.
 
leaningright said:
What you describe here is exactly what Hillary was referring to with her "it takes a village" remark, in my opinion. And in that I most definitely agree. There was a time when immediate families were more intact and extended families (grandparents, uncles, aunts, cousins) lived closer together and even unrelated neighbors were known as to who could be trusted and who could not be. Everyone looked out for everyone else and their kids, for the most part. I know my uncles would be just as apt to bust my tail as my dad if I were to act out and dad wasn't there. That is the way life was, again, for the most part. It's not that way so much anymore and this is where Hillary was going with her comment, I think. Since it is not that way as much anymore, we must all do our part to help when we are allowed to. But even that is getting harder as families are more scattered/broken and we really don't know our neighbors as well as we used to. But in the above context I agree with the sentiment that "it takes a village." Lord knows I rely on my family and neighbors from time to time to help out with my kid. But as the parent, I am still in control and have the final say.

By the way, it is good to see your children are well cared for too, keep up the good work. It's tough being a parent ... at anytime.
Click to expand...

Good post. This is the way I grew up. All adults, whether family or neighbors, kept an eye out on the kids in the neighborhood. We kids never gave it a second thought. If we acted up, we hoped nobody found out because any adult who did was a parent proxy. They couldn't lay a hand on you but they would certainly yell or tell your parents... and the parents never took your side because the adult version of the event was sacrosanct. I think the critics are making a mountain out of a molehill on this issue.
 
pisskop said:
Please tell me you're not so full of stupid you don;t know that some reject your glorious conformist culture of deepfried skittles and orgies. . .

Exactly what I said. Many immigrants purposefully avoid integration into our culture. Many raised right here in America avoid the mainstream culture encouraged by media too. Sociology 102 stuff here.
Click to expand...

What group is this a code for?
 
I think the critics are making a mountain out of a molehill on this issue.
Click to expand...

Whenever Liberal ideologues, who are already brainwashing our children in school and through television, tell us that...really, our kids don't belong to us, it's more than a little disturbing. Give it a few more years to germinate, and you people will be taking it to the SCOTUS, because the Constitution doesn't say you have the right to raise your children. If it's to be the government's responsibility to take care of their health care and wipe their asses as adults, they certainly should have some say in the raising of the child, I can see that argument being made already.

But remember... Palin is the CRAZY one! Palin is the wacko who is insane!
 
christiefan915 said:
What group is this a code for?
Click to expand...

??? I am confused. This is the people who chose not to try to intergrate into our culture. These usually maintain their old traditions, religions, languages. Naturally our society marginalizes them except when the media spotlights them specifically.
 
Grind is Dead said:
why does palin keep thinking she is relevant at all?
Click to expand...

I think there may be more to it than just THINKING you are relevant, after all, look at yourself? If all it took was thinking, you'd have to be a best-selling author who people ask to be their running mate for presidential elections and such, and that obviously isn't happening in your case.
 
ahahaha she was on team dinosaur 5 years ago. her beliefs are outdated, her daughter was on dancing with the stars. They had their own reality tv show. why don't we make honey boo boo our secretary of state? lmao palin is a joke.
 
Grind is Dead said:
ahahaha she was on team dinosaur 5 years ago. her beliefs are outdated, her daughter was on dancing with the stars. They had their own reality tv show. why don't we make honey boo boo our secretary of state? lmao palin is a joke.
Click to expand...

Well, team dinosaur didn't ask you, did they? Neither did team genius or team pothead. Yes.... it's an "outdated" belief that parents are responsible for raising their children. That's what the thread is about, not how good her daughter dances, or whether honey boo boo should be SoS. Let's stick to the meat of the topic, and not wander off into whateverness?

Palin is wacky and out of touch, because she believes things like, parents are responsible for raising their children, and the children do not belong to the government. That's the kind of dinosaur thinking we need to rid ourselves of, according to Libs.


You know, I was thinking that Sarah Palin probably wouldn't be a very good choice for president, maybe she's just not worthy of the office, perhaps all the ridicule and complaint has merit, and she lacks the depth to pull it off.... but the more I read stupidity like what you posted, the more I start to think... why the fuck not? Let's ELECT Sarah President, and let her prove you wrong? It would be worth electing her, just to watch your pinhead explode! And hey... after the Moron who's currently in the office, there isn't much more "damage" Palin could do. Fuck it... give her a shot, I say!
 
Dixie said:
Well, team dinosaur didn't ask you, did they? Neither did team genius or team pothead. Yes.... it's an "outdated" belief that parents are responsible for raising their children. That's what the thread is about, not how good her daughter dances, or whether honey boo boo should be SoS. Let's stick to the meat of the topic, and not wander off into whateverness?

Palin is wacky and out of touch, because she believes things like, parents are responsible for raising their children, and the children do not belong to the government. That's the kind of dinosaur thinking we need to rid ourselves of, according to Libs.


You know, I was thinking that Sarah Palin probably wouldn't be a very good choice for president, maybe she's just not worthy of the office, perhaps all the ridicule and complaint has merit, and she lacks the depth to pull it off.... but the more I read stupidity like what you posted, the more I start to think... why the fuck not? Let's ELECT Sarah President, and let her prove you wrong? It would be worth electing her, just to watch your pinhead explode! And hey... after the Moron who's currently in the office, there isn't much more "damage" Palin could do. Fuck it... give her a shot, I say!
Click to expand...

Yes, most people believe in stripping children from their parents and raising them collectively. It would be reality if it were not for Sarah being all mavericky.

What does Trump say about this nonissue? Oh wait, I forgot that I don't really care.
 
social conservatives have been trying to "prove liberals wrong" in the last 5-6 elections and they keep getting their asses handed to them. The notorious stubbornness of these type of conservatives will be their ultimate downfall.
 
Sir Digby Chicken Caesar said:
Yes, most people believe in stripping children from their parents and raising them collectively. It would be reality if it were not for Sarah being all mavericky.

What does Trump say about this nonissue? Oh wait, I forgot that I don't really care.
Click to expand...

And Glenn Beck, and literally millions and millions of Americans who are shocked that someone on the left would even attempt to make this argument. It's not that we don't believe them, it's that we totally believe them! It's shocking that they actually reveal their truest intentions, and believe we live in a world that agrees with them. Community Parenting is about as looney and moonbat as it gets, but somehow, Sarah Palin is the one who is depicted as a wacko, because she was "mavericky" enough to Tweet, "Unflippinbelievable!"
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top