WHAT HAPPENS WHEN THE POST 2020 ELECTION FORSENIC AUDITS PROVE BIDEN CHEATED

I almost ALWAYS post substantiation for what I post.

You guys almost NEVER post links to reputable sources for anything....

"You guys"? WTF? Who is "You guys"? Is that like "You people"?

Have the guts to address me, not that passive-aggressive bullshit the JPP pussies use.

I post links to reputable sources all the time. What do you need me to look up for you? That Trump is a fucking liar? That the election was fair and secure?

Or do you want me to prove a negative like the Qless wackadoodles often ask?
 
"You guys"? WTF? Who is "You guys"? Is that like "You people"?

Have the guts to address me, not that passive-aggressive bullshit the JPP pussies use.

I post links to reputable sources all the time. What do you need me to look up for you? That Trump is a fucking liar? That the election was fair and secure?

Or do you want me to prove a negative like the Qless wackadoodles often ask?

Let's start with the obvious, which seems to baffle you.

NO ONE here at JPP seems to be into Q or whatever the f*** it is, but you guys.

And they say the Left always tells you who they fear.

Why do you fear Q so much when no one here is into Q much or at all?
 
Indeed. Hopefully some of them become so enraged they will suffer aneurysms and die or live as drooling vegetables like Joe Biden. :)

LOL

The Leftists, I wholeheartedly concur.

But the fuzzy brained Libs just deserve to be wrist slapped for being so willing to entertain and embrace those who hate America and who use them as pawns in order to steal our freedoms and then the country and make us subjects of a Leftist dictatorship.


Barber shaves heads of French, female Nazi-collaborators in Menton, France HD Stock Footage ...

maxresdefault.jpg
 
They deserve to die after prolonged agony, aware of their plight but unable to control their bowels and bladders while I laugh at their humiliation and gloat over their intense suffering. :)

I think the Leftists and Libs should stay away from you or take care not to piss you off.

LOLOL

:thumbsup:
 
"You guys"? WTF? Who is "You guys"? Is that like "You people"?

Have the guts to address me, not that passive-aggressive bullshit the JPP pussies use.

I post links to reputable sources all the time. What do you need me to look up for you? That Trump is a fucking liar? That the election was fair and secure?

Or do you want me to prove a negative like the Qless wackadoodles often ask?

You are silly enough to co-sign on that stupid mind-fucking which says that you can't refer to a group of people with a common social characteristic as "you guys"!

You deserve to be ridiculed and insulted to let those assholes and jerks make you jump through their silly manipulative hoops like a trained dog.
 
Let's start with the obvious, which seems to baffle you.

NO ONE here at JPP seems to be into Q or whatever the f*** it is, but you guys.

And they say the Left always tells you who they fear.

Why do you fear Q so much when no one here is into Q much or at all?

let's start at the beginning. There are people here who said they were in Q and others that showed they agreed with its"philosophy". Deal with facts. It will not be painful.
 
Lawsuits against the 2020 election result were taken to 60 Federal Courts, NOT ONE of them looked at the merits of the cases. They were ALL dismissed on procedural grounds because the Judges were too frightened to do the right thing. FACT.

Same for the US Supreme Court. Chief Justice Roberts - a gutless cocksucker - punted the "State of Texas vs Pennsylvania, etc." lawsuit because he knew if it were examined on its merits, it would overturn the 2020 election result, and he peed his pants at the thought of what might happen to him in consequence.

The Texas case was thrown out because it did not involve a dispute between two states as the plaintiffs claimed. Also, it presented no evidence of fraud. Several of the cases involved examination of evidence. The states defending their count explained all their actions people claimed were fraud and the courts ruled none of the actions would have changed the election results.

Trump lost no matter how long his supporters refuse to believe the facts. In about fifteen minutes you can prove several of the claims Trump made were false:

1. It is not true that no president ever lost when he won both FL and OH as Trump claimed. Even if did occur it does not prove fraud. But Nixon lost after winning FL and OH.

2. It is not true that no Republican member of Congress ever lost when Trump was on the ticket. Two Republican senators lost in 2020 (AZ and CO).

3. There were no counties/states/precincts that had a larger number of voters than registered voters. A few scattered precincts had maybe on more vote than the number of registered voters (usually provisional ballots).

If Trump could not even get these simple facts correct he certainly could not prove others in which he has no evidence. Many of those affidavits did not make any accusations of illegal acts.
 
I would like to know what people here predict will happen after the hand-counted, FORSENIC audits of the November, 2020, Presidential election results in the critical "Swing States" of: Arizona; Pennsylvania; Michigan; Wisconsin, etc; objectively prove that Biden is an illegitimate/unconstitutional POTUS ?


I have thought through the various different ramifications that could play out, and come to the conclusion that the Biden regime will be quickly and quietly removed by a US Military Coup d'etat towards the end of this year. There will be an interim period of Martial Law imposed, then Donald Trump will be reinstalled as President of the US.


Discuss



Dachshund



DLM...Dachshund Lives Matter


Dear fucking idiot Q boy



It’s not possible


There was no cheating by Biden


Fuck you very much
 
The Texas case was thrown out because it did not involve a dispute between two states as the plaintiffs claimed. Also, it presented no evidence of fraud. Several of the cases involved examination of evidence. The states defending their count explained all their actions people claimed were fraud and the courts ruled none of the actions would have changed the election results.

Is that so?
 
Let's start with the obvious, which seems to baffle you.

NO ONE here at JPP seems to be into Q or whatever the f*** it is, but you guys.

And they say the Left always tells you who they fear.

Why do you fear Q so much when no one here is into Q much or at all?
More of that "you guys" bullshit, asshole. Grow a fucking brain, kid, or pull it out of your ass. Something is wrong.

Are you saying the 400+ Insurrectionists are Antifa? Non-Q? What are they?

All of the extremists on this forum, Left or Right (and there's more Right on JPP), are scared to varying degrees outside the normal range. "You guys" all need to get a fucking grip.

Dude, I don't fear Q or even the militias, although the latter are actually dangerous. The Qless are fucking morons. Seriously. 2/3s of the Q arrested have known previous mental issues.

It's been my experience that all extreme people have equally extreme psychological profiles. Although I give the RW idiots shit for not going to the Insurrection, the smart and sane thing to do was to stay out of it. Those people are fucking nuts. Unfortunately, our nation's mental health system sucks, so jail and felony records will have to suffice for them.

The planners will suffer more greatly for their violent actions.
 
I would like to know what people here predict will happen after the hand-counted, FORSENIC audits of the November, 2020, Presidential election results in the critical "Swing States" of: Arizona; Pennsylvania; Michigan; Wisconsin, etc; objectively prove that Biden is an illegitimate/unconstitutional POTUS ?...
Dear fucking idiot Q boy



It’s not possible


There was no cheating by Biden


Fuck you very much

The wiener dog is a Bogan Aussie. TBH, I'm impressed that he can log on and type a post. Most cannot.

There's a reason why Americans can have almost any Aussie chick if they think the American can get them away from Aussie men. :)
 
Lawsuits against the 2020 election result were taken to 60 Federal Courts, NOT ONE of them looked at the merits of the cases. They were ALL dismissed on procedural grounds because the Judges were too frightened to do the right thing. FACT.

Same for the US Supreme Court. Chief Justice Roberts - a gutless cocksucker - punted the "State of Texas vs Pennsylvania, etc." lawsuit because he knew if it were examined on its merits, it would overturn the 2020 election result, and he peed his pants at the thought of what might happen to him in consequence.


Dachshund

The suits are crap and the judges know it.

Definition of Motion to Dismiss

Noun

  1. A motion filed by either party in a lawsuit asking the court to throw out part of the case, or the case in its entirety.

Reasons for Filing a Motion to Dismiss


A Motion to Dismiss is often filed with the court at the earliest stages of the lawsuit, typically before either party has conducted their discovery. This is done when the defendant believes a claim in the lawsuit is legally invalid, or there are legitimate grounds for throwing the case out of court. When a Motion to Dismiss is filed, information supporting the grounds for dismissal must be included in the motion. There are different reasons for filing a Motion to Dismiss, many of which revolve around the following legal deficiencies:

Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction


The court in which the lawsuit was filed does not have jurisdiction, or the authority, to rule on the matter at hand. For example, a suit requesting enforcement of a child support order cannot be heard in small claims court.

Lack of Personal Jurisdiction


The court does not have the authority to rule on matters that affect one or all of the parties. For example, if Bob is in a car accident in Florida, and the other party involved in the accident files a lawsuit in California, the court would not be able to hear the case.

Improper Venue


The court, or “venue,” in which the matter has been fined is the wrong court to hear the case. For example, Amanda’s accountant, Charlie, siphoned money out of her account for his personal use. Charlie is charged with the crime of embezzlement in criminal court. Amanda wants to sue Charlie for her financial losses, but the criminal court cannot hear that part of the case, as it is not the proper venue. Amanda must file a lawsuit in civil court for damages related to the crime.

Failure to State a Claim for Which Relief Can be Granted


If the plaintiff fails to provide sufficient facts to, if taken on face value as being true, indicate that the defendant violated a law, or caused harm or loss due to negligence, he has failed to state a claim for which relief can be granted. In other words, if the complaint does not clearly say what the defendant did wrong, the court cannot grant any form of relief, and so the case does not need to be heard. For example, there is a company policy that employees greet one another in a friendly manner at work. Joe files a lawsuit claiming that Bob failed to say hello in passing. Bob can file a Motion to Dismiss, as failing to greet another person is not illegal, therefore there is no claim for which relief can be granted.

https://legaldictionary.net/motion-to-dismiss/
 
Back
Top