WHAT HAPPENS WHEN THE POST 2020 ELECTION FORSENIC AUDITS PROVE BIDEN CHEATED

Media Bias: TV Networks Blast Trump with 96% Negative News

https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politi...orks-blast-trump-with-96-negative-news-n70386

I HAVE POSTED THIS SO MANTY TIMES, THAT EVERYONE ELSE IS ALREADY FAMILIAR WITH IT.

But, your brain damage prevents you from even recognizing it.

You just disqualified yourself as an objective reporter.

When you try to discredit an accepted and proven fact from several reputable sources all which say the same thing, which everyone else has seen dozens and dozens of times, no one will believe anything you say without proof.

They will, rightly, question your mental abilities as well as your integrity.

They might assume you are a lying imbecile.

Now explain what I have to accept your cherry-picked article as fact. I do not. As I showed you , there is an enormous right-wing press. You should admit that because you are immersed in it. Those numbers are false. Is this where I insult you? Somehow the rightys seem to think they win arguments that way. They do not.
 
Now explain what I have to accept your cherry-picked article as fact. I do not. As I showed you , there is an enormous right-wing press. You should admit that because you are immersed in it. Those numbers are false. Is this where I insult you? Somehow the rightys seem to think they win arguments that way. They do not.

You question the integrity of Real Clear Politics, the Media Research Center and PJ Media?

You really are mentally deficient if you believe that.

Or if you expect any readers to believe you!

Trump's Popularity Rose Despite 90 Percent Negative Media Coverage in 2018
BY TYLER O'NEIL JAN 15, 2019 8:01 AM ET

Despite constant one-sided negative news coverage by the big three TV networks, President Donald Trump’s public approval rating rose slightly in 2018, according to a new report from the Media Research Center (MRC). MRC analyzed the ABC, CBS, and NBC evening newscasts, which were seen by approximately 23 million people each night.

“The tone of coverage remains incessantly hostile: 90% negative, vs. just 10% positive (excluding neutral statements),” MRC’s Rich Noyes reported Tuesday. “Yet despite the media’s obvious disapproval, public opinion of the President actually improved slightly during 2018, from an average 40% approval on January 1 to 42.7% approval on December 31, according to RealClearPolitics.”

https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politi...ercent-negative-media-coverage-in-2018-n63112
 
Which newspaper?

The Epoch Times is now America’s fastest-growing newspaper.

iu


https://irnglobal.com/the-epoch-times-is-now-americas-fastest-growing-newspaper/

https://www.theepochtimes.com/us-news
 
Is there some reason we should accept the numbers you made up? The right-wing utterly slanted media is everywhere. If you are honest, you would admit that is all you consume. Ever hear of Newsmax, Fox, Blaze, American Spectator, National Review, Daily Caller, OAN, Wash, Times, or all the others? That does not include the online crapola.
Your brain has been taken over.

Inversion fallacy. You are describing yourself.
 
Media Bias: TV Networks Blast Trump with 96% Negative News

https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politi...orks-blast-trump-with-96-negative-news-n70386

I HAVE POSTED THIS SO MANTY TIMES, THAT EVERYONE ELSE IS ALREADY FAMILIAR WITH IT.

But, your brain damage prevents you from even recognizing it.

You just disqualified yourself as an objective reporter.

When you try to discredit an accepted and proven fact from several reputable sources all which say the same thing, which everyone else has seen dozens and dozens of times, no one will believe anything you say without proof.

They will, rightly, question your mental abilities as well as your integrity.

They might assume you are a lying imbecile.

Of course they all say the same thing. It's Associated Press and it's major sources, the New York Times, the Washington Compost and the LA Times.
 
Son, the "MSM" can say all they want, but a person with critical thinking skills can spot the bullshit and extract the facts. Are you saying they are outright lying or just spinning the facts? There is a difference.

IF, if, if. Prove it and I'll listen.

I channel surf....usually with the tv sound down and playing Spotify on my sound system. I'll listen to the news in the morning with my coffee, but it's the same shit all day long unless something big happens. Mainly I skip between Fox and CNN to see what they're whining about that day. I do have the CC on.

Why do you think your fellow Americans are so fucking stupid and that only you know what is best for them?

So you listen daily to the propaganda with your morning coffee, eh?
 
Now explain what I have to accept your cherry-picked article as fact. I do not. As I showed you , there is an enormous right-wing press. You should admit that because you are immersed in it. Those numbers are false. Is this where I insult you? Somehow the rightys seem to think they win arguments that way. They do not.

So you are discussing a fact and denying it at the same time...right. Learn what 'fact' means, dumbass.
 
Son, the "MSM" can say all they want, but a person with critical thinking skills can spot the bullshit and extract the facts. Are you saying they are outright lying or just spinning the facts? There is a difference.

IF, if, if. Prove it and I'll listen.

I channel surf....usually with the tv sound down and playing Spotify on my sound system. I'll listen to the news in the morning with my coffee, but it's the same shit all day long unless something big happens. Mainly I skip between Fox and CNN to see what they're whining about that day. I do have the CC on.

Why do you think your fellow Americans are so fucking stupid and that only you know what is best for them?

I almost ALWAYS post substantiation for what I post.

You guys almost NEVER post links to reputable sources for anything.

I know that you don't pay attention to anything but the dishonest media, so I tell you what the OTHER SIDE says and I post links for you to see it for yourself.

But you ignore it or pretend it is bogus simply because it opposes the msm line.

I prove it every day and you remain ignorant or obstructive and oppositional.

I have to watch and read the msm because not only is it ubiquitous,* but because the msm is how we are able to track the Leftist assault on America.

I care about America.

You remain obstructionist, in denial, or ignorant because you only want to win at any cost and it weakens your dedication to winning when you read, watch and listen to the truth from the Right.




* u•biq•ui•tous yoo͞-bĭk′wĭ-təs►
adj. Being or seeming to be everywhere at the same time; omnipresent.
Being or existing everywhere; actually or apparently omnipresent: often used in an exaggerated or humorous sense.
 
Back
Top