What are Leftist American Marxists Trying to Destroy and Replace?

They are all alike
Those who say "They are all alike" simply aren't smart enough to understand the world of differences.

, distinctions without a difference,
... huge differences that you apparently you can't see.

for those they exploit;
The word "exploit" is the broadcast advertisement that one doesn't know anything about what he's talking.

You think that if WalMart offers someone a job, and he accepts, that he is being exploited by WalMart. Stupid.

marxist, fascist, Apple, Walmart, Red Chinese Cadre, etc.
At least you admit that they all look alike to you because you can't grasp the chasm separating them.

Some of the managers just distribute the wealth down a little more
Stupid people think wealth is "distributed", implying that it should be "redistributed" better.

and feed their poor peasants better than some, is all.
A course in economics would do you a world of good ... unless you sleep through it like you did high school.

How income is really allocated:
Allocated? Pay is a contract item.

The 'nee corporate' of course are far more greedy
The word "greedy" is your broadcast advertisement that you totally deny human nature by denigrating profit motive.

and lack basic common sense,
You do.

so they will soon collapse the entire system.
The problem with your view is that, if it were true, all economies would be short-lived, i.e. humanity would have come up with something different millenia prior.

Alas, economies work just fine.

Noam Chomsky is right about one thing,
Nope. You should have led with "I entertain Chomsky's gibber-babble" and allowed readers to nake the informed decision to skip your post entirely.

Joseph Kennedy said it best, when he sided with FDR's agenda over the psychos Raskob and the far right wing wealth bloc:
Yeah, I'll just skip your post. At least now I understand why you routinely come across as a raving loon.
 
Trump started as a fascist.
Well, Trump did start as a Democrat. I see that you can "connect the dots".

He has no respect for laws, regulations, or norms.
Trump operates completely within the law. I think everyone knows that you aren't going to provide any examples to support your absurd assertion.

He was never inside the framework of the law.
Cough up examples spanning both Presidencies. You made the stupid assertion, so back it up.

He sees himself as king., above the law.
You can read minds, eh? Of what number am I thinking (rounded to four decimal places)?
 
Those who say "They are all alike" simply aren't smart enough to understand the world of differences.


... huge differences that you apparently you can't see.


The word "exploit" is the broadcast advertisement that one doesn't know anything about what he's talking.

You think that if WalMart offers someone a job, and he accepts, that he is being exploited by WalMart. Stupid.


At least you admit that they all look alike to you because you can't grasp the chasm separating them.


Stupid people think wealth is "distributed", implying that it should be "redistributed" better.


A course in economics would do you a world of good ... unless you sleep through it like you did high school.


Allocated? Pay is a contract item.


The word "greedy" is your broadcast advertisement that you totally deny human nature by denigrating profit motive.


You do.


The problem with your view is that, if it were true, all economies would be short-lived, i.e. humanity would have come up with something different millenia prior.

Alas, economies work just fine.


Nope. You should have led with "I entertain Chomsky's gibber-babble" and allowed readers to nake the informed decision to skip your post entirely.


Yeah, I'll just skip your post. At least now I understand why you routinely come across as a raving loon.
there's no chasm.

you just believe in too large businesses and a too large government to so they can force their preferences onto society.

should monopolies and cartels be busted up because of the benefits of free market competition?
 
The abject terror the Right has of creeping socialism is weird. Given that they seem to want some sort of hard-core market-driven pure capitalism. We tried that. The 1890's Gilded Age was the result. Capitalism unfettered by controls leads to extremes of wealth inequality and poverty. People become chattel.

All the people who are terrified of a social democrat wouldn't survive one minute in the "capitalist utopia" they think they want.
 
Those who say "They are all alike" simply aren't smart enough to understand the world of differences.


... huge differences that you apparently you can't see.


The word "exploit" is the broadcast advertisement that one doesn't know anything about what he's talking.

You think that if WalMart offers someone a job, and he accepts, that he is being exploited by WalMart. Stupid.


At least you admit that they all look alike to you because you can't grasp the chasm separating them.


Stupid people think wealth is "distributed", implying that it should be "redistributed" better.


A course in economics would do you a world of good ... unless you sleep through it like you did high school.


Allocated? Pay is a contract item.


The word "greedy" is your broadcast advertisement that you totally deny human nature by denigrating profit motive.


You do.


The problem with your view is that, if it were true, all economies would be short-lived, i.e. humanity would have come up with something different millenia prior.

Alas, economies work just fine.


Nope. You should have led with "I entertain Chomsky's gibber-babble" and allowed readers to nake the informed decision to skip your post entirely.


Yeah, I'll just skip your post. At least now I understand why you routinely come across as a raving loon.

IbDhalfwit babbles some more. Keeps shilling for people who hate this country as much as any Red does, hoping somebody rich will adopt him and let him lick their floors.
 
there's no chasm.

you just believe in too large businesses and a too large government to so they can force their preferences onto society.

should monopolies and cartels be busted up because of the benefits of free market competition?

The irony here is these fake 'free market' numbnuts don't even realize the whole 'limited liability' gimmick can only be enforced by the state in the first place. It's a super-privilege, as that Ramesay guy explained in his Woke, Inc book, or however it's spelled, the Indian guy who ran for Prez in the primaries. LArge corps need big govt.; they're joined at the hip, same way the East India Company was joined to the Crown and Bank of England.
 
Back
Top