Mussolini started as a socialist and rejected it for fascism.
What are Leftist American Marxists Trying to Destroy and Replace?
- Thread starter Libhater
- Start date
IBDaMann
Well-known member
Find one who disagrees with Giovanni Gentile and I'll tell you how mistaken he is.
IBDaMann
Well-known member
Mussolini never rejected socialism; he embraced it, or rather, he embraced the fascism flavor of it. Fascism is simply socialism rebranded. Hitler's fascism was called "National Socialism" (from whence the name Nazi" comes).
I have not read any.
None of that is true. Mussolini said the socialists were not ready to rule.
AProudLefty
The remora of JPP
This is the direct copy and paste from "The Doctrine of Fascism".
"We are free to believe that this is the century of authority, a century tending to the " right ", a Fascist century."
Freddy Figbottom
Was it me?
Nope. Creating value out of nothing has many names, but "deception" is not among them. Excellent customer service is one way to create value out of nothing. Real estate development is another. IBDaMann making a post on JPP is yet another. Mining gems, or pulling something valuable out of the ground is yet another. The list goes on and on and on and on.
The unbrella category is "wealth creation" and Americans are great at it.
Nope. We the People expect our government to serve us and to create value for us. If that weren't the case then We the People wouldn't want the republic.
He's long since dead. You missed your chance.
I wouldn't go that far.
when its fake value its deception.
like counterfeit money.
Freddy Figbottom
Was it me?
no.
fascism is the union of state and corporate power.
nothing more. nothing less.
Freddy Figbottom
Was it me?
AProudLefty
The remora of JPP
Read Mussolini's paper.
Freddy Figbottom
Was it me?
fuck Mussolini.
Freddy Figbottom
Was it me?
what do you call the union of state and corporate power?
IBDaMann
Well-known member
You are taking a snippet out of context. Socialism is on the left.
^^^This. They are all alike, distinctions without a difference, for those they exploit; marxist, fascist, Apple, Walmart, Red Chinese Cadre, etc. Some of the managers just distribute the wealth down a little more and feed their poor peasants better than some, is all.
How income is really allocated:
The L-Curve 2.0: An Updated Graph of the US Income Distribution
The US Income distribution does not look like a "Bell Curve". It is an "L-Curve": a gradual ramp for 99% of the population forming "horizontal branch" and a steep spike at top reacing beyond stratosphere. The disparity is so great it is difficult to represent on single graph. To comprehend it...
lcurve.org
Somewhat outdated, but the general gist is still correct. The 'nee corporate' of course are far more greedy and lack basic common sense, so they will soon collapse the entire system. Noam Chomsky is right about one thing, at least, and that is the 'Masters Of The Universe' will soon start plundering each other after they absorb everything else and there is nothing left to steal from the little people, even labor; they will have to start robbing each other.
Joseph Kennedy said it best, when he sided with FDR's agenda over the psychos Raskob and the far right wing wealth bloc:
" I would gladly give up 90% of what I have in order to keep the last 10% under some form of law and order." FDR was smarter than the laissez faire morons and isolationists, which is why he got elected four times. Kennedy was one of the brighter sociopaths who knew the limits of 'business' and when it was time to stop stealing for a while and replenish the pool.
Last edited:
Rubbish. All socialism is corporate welfare.
Jake Starkey
Verified User
EdwinA is ignorant of the isms of the 20th century.
No, you don't get your own definitions and facts, Eddy.
No, you don't get your own definitions and facts, Eddy.
Freddy Figbottom
Was it me?
^^^This. They are all alike, distinctions without a difference, for those they exploit; marxist, fascist, Apple, Walmart, Red Chinese Cadre, etc. Some of the managers just distribute the wealth down a little more and feed their poor peasants better than some, is all.
How income is really allocated:
The L-Curve 2.0: An Updated Graph of the US Income Distribution
The US Income distribution does not look like a "Bell Curve". It is an "L-Curve": a gradual ramp for 99% of the population forming "horizontal branch" and a steep spike at top reacing beyond stratosphere. The disparity is so great it is difficult to represent on single graph. To comprehend it...
Somewhat outdated, but the general gist is still correct. The 'nee corporate' of course are far more greedy and lack basic common sense, so they will soon collapse the entire system. Noam Chomsky is right about one thing, at least, and that is the 'Masters Of The Universe' will soon start plundering each other after they absorb everything else and there is nothing left to steal from the little people, even labor; they will have to start robbing each other.
Joseph Kennedy said it best, when he sided with FDR's agenda over the psychos Raskob and the far right wing wealth bloc:
" I would gladly give up 90% of what I have in order to keep the last 10% under some form of law and order." FDR was smarter than the laissez faire morons and isolationists, which is why he got elected four times. Kennedy was one of the brighter sociopaths who knew the limits of 'business' and when it was time to stop stealing for a while and replenish the pool.
the discourse has become idiotic in this country, and simplified down into two dumb things, big government versus big business.
both become too big when this level of cartelization is occurring.
actual free marketters think monopoly is bad.
fascists just talk about the savings from economies of scale.