WH Bars Republicans from Jobs Meeting

Onceler said:
Are you really trying to pretend you're not a shill for the right-wing?
Click to expand...
LOL

Since when does it take a shill for the right wing to recognize when someone has their head so far up the donkey's ass they have cease anything resembling cognizance? Your continued defense of the indefensible just shows, when push comes to shove, who the actual shill is.
 
bravo said:
You're a riot dude....

We all KNOW what "that" refers to...is that your attempt to deflect the point...???

PMP said that some think "part of the definition" of "bipartisanship" is "being invited to everything."(actually, the underlined phase are your words, not his)

Are you seriously trying to convince us that "SOME THINK" is pmp's way of saying "I THINK".....
Just man up and admit you're a liar.....
"some think" does not equate to "I think" ....never has and never will....

It kills me to admit Yurt was right about you all along....but I'll bit the bullet in this case.......
You lie...then you shift blame to someone else, then you try to deflect the whole point of contention to something entirely bogus.....

Just man up and take your medicine...the rest of the folks can read...and you're looking like a fool with every attempt to defend your lie.

:palm::lolup:
Click to expand...

It's funny how you ignore his saying "I wouldn't expect a liberal to understand that."

But it doesn't matter; you said I made the contention, not PMP. I asked the question; PMP made the contention. Oh - and I have stated that he said "some think" all along; that was part of the contention.

You gave it the good ol' college try, though. Now, stop - I hate feeling embarassed for you....
 
Good Luck said:
LOL

Since when does it take a shill for the right wing to recognize when someone has their head so far up the donkey's ass they have cease anything resembling cognizance? Your continued defense of the indefensible just shows, when push comes to shove, who the actual shill is.
Click to expand...

And only a shill would call a fairly unremarkable meeting between Dem govs & the Prez "indefensible."
 
Ice Dancer said:
All the defending aside that these yahoos on here have done...I thought the dems wanted involvement in problem solving from republicans? Since jobs in every state impact the fiscal health of our country why in the hell would Obama prevent 29 states from coming to the table? I say it's because he does not care about fiscal health...he wants power period!
Click to expand...

He's posturing and giving us a forewarning of what his 2012 campaign spiel will be. Don't for one minute believe he's forgotten about the trouncing the Dims took in November. Revenge is on his mind and on his mind fully.

I am already seeing 2012 Obama bumper stickers here in No Cal.
 
Jesus Christ on a cracker. This thread is hilarious.

Has anyone heard any of the Republican governors complaining about Obama meeting with the Democratic governors? I haven't. Maybe it's because he's meeting with all of the governors on Monday after hosting the gala dinner on Sunday.

Fucking jackasses. You've all lost it.
 
usaloyal2theend said:
He's posturing and giving us a forewarning of what his 2012 campaign spiel will be. Don't for one minute believe he's forgotten about the trouncing the Dims took in November. Revenge is on his mind and on his mind fully.

I am already seeing 2012 Obama bumper stickers here in No Cal.
Click to expand...

His partisanship with regards to his so called jobs meeting proves his interest's lie in power structures not in our nation as a whole. Call it revenge or call it arrogance...it's all about power-his power.
 
Damocles said:
Translation: Durrr... Durrr... Durrr.... Four legs good, two legs b-a-a-a-d!
/translation

:rolleyes:

Governors are not the congress, even if the congress had "no interest" in creating jobs Governors do. The reality is the WH is focusing on partisan politics to the detriment of the nation as a whole. A fear that Republicans can use this to advance what can be good ideas is at the heart of this exclusion. Considering many of these Governors just got their jobs from the electorate he is sworn to serve pretty much tells us that exclusion of the opposition party is not a good idea.
Click to expand...

O.K., I know you guys need to focus only on the O.P.'s point and nothing else, but do you really believe that job creation is more in the purview of govenors than the house of reps? By the way, does trying to belittle me make your point more clearly?
 
I don't think Damo ever met a thread like this he didn't like.

The way they're talking, this was THE meeting about jobs. There is no other; if you didn't get your ideas submitted for this one, you're SOL.

Bipartisanship does not mean everyone all of a sudden shares the same principles & agenda. Parties are SUPPOSED to have their own principles & agendas, and yes Virginia, it's okay if they meet separately to discuss those & hone them.

Bipartisanship happens when both parties come together on legislation with their very DIFFERENT principles & agendas, and find areas of compromise so they can produce a good bill.
 
Dune said:
O.K., I know you guys need to focus only on the O.P.'s point and nothing else, but do you really believe that job creation is more in the purview of govenors than the house of reps? By the way, does trying to belittle me make your point more clearly?
Click to expand...

No, but it does however illuminate that when it comes to Obama you are blinded by the light.

If a Republican president left out the Dims, you would be squealing like a stuck pig.

I don't know why you like to try and intimate you "know" these guys here, but I do know a pablum, spoon-fed Liberal who just knows how to respond: "Ahhhh", after Obama tells you to open wide.
 
Last edited:
Onceler said:
It's funny how you ignore his saying "I wouldn't expect a liberal to understand that."

But it doesn't matter; you said I made the contention, not PMP. I asked the question; PMP made the contention. Oh - and I have stated that he said "some think" all along; that was part of the contention.

You gave it the good ol' college try, though. Now, stop - I hate feeling embarassed for you....
Click to expand...

sad.....apparently you'd rather talk about who said what when than talk about the thread topic.....
 
usaloyal2theend said:
No, but it does however illuminate that when it comes to Obama you are blinded by the light.

If a Republican president left out the Dims, you would be squealing like a stuck pig.

I don't know you like you try and intimate you "know" these guys here, but I do know a pablum, spoon-fed Liberal who just knows how to respond: "Ahhhh", after Obama tells you to open wide.
Click to expand...

I am sure all the put downs make up for your personal insecurities or whatever, but what about what I said?

Who the fuck are any of you to complain about lack of bipartisanship after 8 years of Bush anyway?
 
Dune said:
I am sure all the put downs make up for your personal insecurities or whatever, but what about what I said?

Who the fuck are any of you to complain about lack of bipartisanship after 8 years of Bush anyway?
Click to expand...

So when was it Bush called for a jobs meeting with the governors of states except for those that had a "D" after their title?

How about you try getting the gist of what Obama did and try remembering that though his ideological leanings are liberal HIS JOB AS PRESIDENT is to govern fairly and with patrotic fidelity to ALL 50 states...no not ALL 57!
 
Dune said:
I am sure all the put downs make up for your personal insecurities or whatever, but what about what I said?

Who the fuck are any of you to complain about lack of bipartisanship after 8 years of Bush anyway?
Click to expand...

Well since you plopped your ass down on this board hurling insults right out of the gate
I understand your firsthand observation, but let's get back to the point.

You and your fellow crybabies bitched, moaned and whined 8 fucking solid years about anything you could get your grubby little hands on. The screams of unfairness and ad nauseum boo-hooing we'd have heard if Bush barred the dims would have been deafening yet one thing remains constant. You all are still a bunch of mindless pussies. I shall watch with a smirk on my face when Obama asks you to jump.
 
usaloyal2theend said:
Well since you plopped your ass down on this board hurling insults right out of the gate
I understand your firsthand observation, but let's get back to the point.

You and your fellow crybabies bitched, moaned and whined 8 fucking solid years about anything you could get your grubby little hands on. The screams of unfairness and ad nauseum boo-hooing we'd have heard if Bush barred the dims would have been deafening yet one thing remains constant. You all are still a bunch of mindless pussies. I shall watch with a smirk on my face when Obama asks you to jump.
Click to expand...

^ another reason i believe dune is a troll. he allegedly put me on ignore for a simple debate dispute....yet he goes back and forth with other posters in a much more insulting manner. the way he got so personal with me, so quick, leads me to believe he is not just some new poster. he already had a grudge.....
 
Dune said:
O.K., I know you guys need to focus only on the O.P.'s point and nothing else, but do you really believe that job creation is more in the purview of govenors than the house of reps? By the way, does trying to belittle me make your point more clearly?
Click to expand...
Right. As if your tone had nothing to do with the tone of my post. I think you'd note I said "even if Congress has no interest in job creation"... which isn't the case.
 
Dune said:
I am sure all the put downs make up for your personal insecurities or whatever, but what about what I said?

Who the fuck are any of you to complain about lack of bipartisanship after 8 years of Bush anyway?
Click to expand...

Bipartisanship was alive and well back then for awhile....take the Iraq War Resolution for example.....it could not have passed congress without the support of Democrats....like Hillary Clinton, John Kerry..etc.

about 110 Democrats in Congress joined with Republicans in bipartisanship to pass the bill.....
 
bravo said:
Bipartisanship was alive and well back then for awhile....take the Iraq War Resolution for example.....it could not have passed congress without the support of Democrats....like Hillary Clinton, John Kerry..etc.

about 110 Democrats in Congress joined with Republicans in bipartisanship to pass the bill.....
Click to expand...

:palm:

Good call; Congress understood the importance of displaying a show of unity to Saddam, and Bush abused their trust by rushing to war.

What a wonderful historical example...thanks, bravs!
 
Onceler said:
I'm talking about both. But when posters like bravs try to twist what I said & inaccurately portray my words...yeah, I'll respond to that, too.
Click to expand...
Anyone interested can go back to Post #7 and confirm your words....

and then to post 26 or so see what pmp said....its right there for all....
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top