Exactly, and I invite them to.
I ask the question; PMP makes the contention. And you continue to trumpet your steady, unwavering stupidity...
WH Bars Republicans from Jobs Meeting
- Thread starter Canceled2
- Start date
Exactly, and I invite them to.
I ask the question; PMP makes the contention. And you continue to trumpet your steady, unwavering stupidity...
Still spouting lies sonny....???
Good call; Congress understood the importance of displaying a show of unity to Saddam, and Bush abused their trust by rushing to war.
What a wonderful historical example...thanks, bravs!
Any "rush" is a figment of your imagination....or just a plain lie, whatever...
There was no rush....no rush at all....Bush waited the passage of the bill....for Congressional approval...bipartisan approval.......without it,there would not have been any war....110+Democrats...AYE!
Well........actually...I INVITED THEM TO.
Still rewriting history, old-timer?
The resolution wasn't a declaration of war. Bush made a pledge to Congress that he would exhaust all options aside from force before committing to military action. Dick Armey - Dick friggin' Armey, of all people - said that Bush & Cheney assured him personally that they would only use the authorization as an absolute last resort, and that he never thought it meant invasion in such short order.
Bush rushed to war; and make no mistake - it was Bush's war. Nothing you say on a message board will change that history, and that is how the vast majority will see it.
USFREEDOM911
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
'Who the fuck are any of you to complain about lack of bipartisanship after 8 years of Bush anyway?"
Translation:
WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA; YOU DID IT FIRST.
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
tell us....which congress members FUNDED "bush's war"? you do know how our government works....right?
i don't recall dem senators or house members standing up in unison decrying bush going to war in the WEEKS prior the invasion. there might have been a few....but by no means, was iraq bush's war. that is a dishonest portrayal of history.
wasn't a declaration of war???
Haha...is that another lame attempt to just "slightly change" what I said? Another white lie perhaps ?
No one called anything a "declaration of war"....it was formally the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002
not quite a declaration of war....hahahaha
Yep...it was the last resort....and nothing you say or believe will change the facts that it couldn't have occurred without the votes of Democrats to pass the authorization....thats....
the authorization to use force....which the President did thanks to the support he was given....
Pathetic rewriting of history. You should be embarassed.
And, as I always say, very telling; if Iraq had been the right call, you wouldn't be tripping over yourselves to give Democrats "credit." As a matter of fact, I very distinctly remember what Democrats place was when it did look like a success & a good decision, right after Saddam's statue toppled. At BEST, Dems & the left were on the "wrong side of history." But more often than not, they were simply "traitors."
Now, you want to rewrite the whole thing; why, it was the Dems AND Bush who started the war...they were all in it together!
Bush's war - always & forever.
And, as I always say, very telling; if Iraq had been the right call, you wouldn't be tripping over yourselves to give Democrats "credit." As a matter of fact, I very distinctly remember what Democrats place was when it did look like a success & a good decision, right after Saddam's statue toppled. At BEST, Dems & the left were on the "wrong side of history." But more often than not, they were simply "traitors."
Now, you want to rewrite the whole thing; why, it was the Dems AND Bush who started the war...they were all in it together!
Bush's war - always & forever.
You guys are fighting over which piece of globalist war monger propaganda is more correct
Both sides drummed up the Iraq war long before Bush was in office. Bush was a willing puppet just like Obama is and just like Clinton, Reagan(after they shot him), and every other president since Kennedy, who found out the hard way what it's like to tug the strings.
And if Gore was president, he would have made the case for war just the same.
Stop buying the lies in the future. Let go of the past and learn to spot rhetoric coming at you from both ends of the spectrum. The elite are fooling us into fighting each other instead of their systematic corruption.
Both sides drummed up the Iraq war long before Bush was in office. Bush was a willing puppet just like Obama is and just like Clinton, Reagan(after they shot him), and every other president since Kennedy, who found out the hard way what it's like to tug the strings.
And if Gore was president, he would have made the case for war just the same.
Stop buying the lies in the future. Let go of the past and learn to spot rhetoric coming at you from both ends of the spectrum. The elite are fooling us into fighting each other instead of their systematic corruption.
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
it just makes it more enjoyable......
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
good lord, why don't you both forget about #7 and #26 and work forward from #46.....
Congress as a whole may be interested in job creation, yet does spending time filing bills to recall obamacare (which have no hope of passing) indicate any interest in job creation to you?
For a man, you sure act like a child. Name calling seems to be your greatest strength.
Ahh, you finaly made a valid point.
Actualy I was disapointed when Ted threw his endorsement to Obama. I would have much prefered Hillary. I am very unhappy with Obama for;
1. Not pursuing criminal charges against the Bush administration.
2. Backing down from the public option.
3. Not making job creation his #1 priority.
4. Furthering the war effort rather than reducing it.
Stuck pig; wrong, this meeting hold far less gravity to me than it apparently does to any of you.
I didn't say or imply I know these guys, what I said was that I know they like to focus on the O.P.'s point. This has been my experience here. Maybe you should read more carefully before commenting.
Fact, I started an introduction thread and was open about my leanings.
While I suppose I shouldn't have expected a warm welcome, I was surprised by the hostility and acusations of being a troll. After a few hundred posts in my own thread, I did lose my cool. Hardly right out of the gate.
Look at your own post quoted above.
"lets get back to the point" What follows this sentence is an entire paragraph of disgusting insults and putdowns, in your own words, "the point". I see little point in engaging in name calling contests with those of professional caliber.
For Gods sake, even the moderators routinely sling insults rather than respond to the opponents point. What a bunch of children, especialy you Damocles, so obviously well endowed intellectualy. What a shame and a waste. Well, it is obviously working for you, but could be so much more.
USFREEDOM911
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
So says the poster who is using the "But Mommy, he did it first" defense.
Gore wouldn't have gone to war. The only reason we went to war was because PNAC was so persuasive & sold Bush on their democratized vision of the Middle East. PNAC wouldn't have had a part in a Gore admin.
That's like saying we would have had Obamacare even if McCain had been elected...
Good Luck
New member
So does that mean the previous congress, who spent the vast majority of their efforts passing obamacare, also indicates a lack of interest in jobs creation?
Ever heard of multitasking?
And you ignored this response
"So when was it Bush called for a jobs meeting with the governors of states except for those that had a "D" after their title?
How about you try getting the gist of what Obama did and try remembering that though his ideological leanings are liberal HIS JOB AS PRESIDENT is to govern fairly and with patrotic fidelity to ALL 50 states...no not ALL 57! "