WATCH: Target Shopper Demands ‘Reparations’ — Security Guard Punches Her In The Face

Democrats want to keep them there, ground down in poverty and illiteracy and gangs. The inner cities are effectively the modern 'plantation'. There, the Democrats will 'take care of them' in much the same way the 'cared for' the slaves.

A few escape, but it ain't easy.

What is your solution?
 
Yes, the WOKE are removing our right to self defense.....and before you tell me that the Government has no right to remove our right to self defense I know that....this goes to show how deeply the WOKE are rotten.

They cannot remove the right of self defense. The right is inherent.
 
I'M LEGION's WIENER
I LOVE TO EXPOSE MYSELF
BOOM SHAKA LAKA​

7i7yfr.gif
You should consider a diet and a better fitness plan, Legion. ;)
 
It was obviously self defense.

And look where it's left them. Dependent on welfare, out of work, and ground down in poverty and gangs by 'caring' Democrats.

They weren't born in Africa.

Racism.

Racism.

Racism.

Science isn't a prize. Racism.

Not surprising, since chess is mostly played in northern Europe and Russia.

It tells me you are racist.

For what? Self defense?

Racism. Learn what 'fact' means. Argument from randU fallacy. IQ is a meaningless number. Attempted proof by buzzword.

Democrats want to keep them there, ground down in poverty and illiteracy and gangs. The inner cities are effectively the modern 'plantation'. There, the Democrats will 'take care of them' in much the same way the 'cared for' the slaves.

A few escape, but it ain't easy.

They cannot remove the right of self defense. The right is inherent.

Are you really that clueless that you have to ask this question? :rofl2:

Argument of the Stone fallacy.

Yes. You are racist. So is affirmative action.

Scientophobic poseur- who refuses to accept, among other facts, that Sweden has an arctic component.



Haw, haw.............................................haw.
 
A valid query.

Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
THIS is on your hooded mind?

Jeez, take it off and get some air, toodles.

It's a matter of history, son.....industrial cities presented a better hope of a better life than the rural, agricultural based areas where we were enslaved for about 2 centuries. But as time progressed, we've come to this: Roughly equal shares of Black adults describe the community where they live as urban (41%) or suburban (40%), while almost two-in-ten (18%) describe their community as rural, according to the new Pew Research Center survey.

Hope this eases your mind.
No because the urban life of that 41% doesn’t appear to bring hope for a better life. Quite the opposite.

I'm always fascinated as to how folk of your mindset think they are rational, objective and accurate in commenting/analyzing black folk in America. Elucidate, my son, elucidate!
 
I'm always fascinated as to how folk of your mindset think they are rational, objective and accurate in commenting/analyzing black folk in America. Elucidate, my son, elucidate!
Well, the most obvious example is the rate at which blacks murder each other in urban settings.
Small towns are are just safer to live in. Race irrelevant.
 
Well, the most obvious example is the rate at which blacks murder each other in urban settings.
Small towns are are just safer to live in. Race irrelevant.

Why are urban settings more dangerous? Remember the "gangs of New York"? The Mick and Dago gangs murdering each other? What was the solution there?
 
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
I'm always fascinated as to how folk of your mindset think they are rational, objective and accurate in commenting/analyzing black folk in America. Elucidate, my son, elucidate!

Well, the most obvious example is the rate at which blacks murder each other in urban settings.
Small towns are are just safer to live in. Race irrelevant.

:palm: Oh Lord, this old David Duke/StormFront/KKK chestnut again?

I grew up watching b/w reruns of the old "Dead End Kids" and "East Side Kids/Bowery Boys". Hollywood dealing with the REALITY of poor folk living in urban settings. Cagney, Bogart, Robinson....all had movies portraying poor folk living in crime ridden urban neighborhoods were organized crime (gangsters, MAFIA) were a part of life.

Things got somewhat better, but when black folk started moving in, you had the "white flight" to the suburbs. So now black folk contend with the same conditions (low employment, caste system politics, zoning of wealthy, middle, working poor & poor folk) that white folk did. And jokers like you pretend no white folk in urban areas never commit any type of crime. When that BS is debunked, then the old stat game comes out. Of course, the fact that a mere fraction of 1% of the black population on any level are responsible for the crimes carries no weight. But, apply your logic when it comes to say rape and white crime stats, and you jokers dance like a chicken on a hot plate.

Now having put your first sentence to rest. Let's move onto the second and third.

Agreed, BUT it depends on where you live. A couple I knew from Kentucky came from a small town....they told me tales of how tough that town was that would have your hair stand on end. They as with 100% of the town were caucasians of European descent.

As for the suburbs, yes....less crime, crowding, air pollution. I live in the suburbs of NYC....as do a lot of black folk....living along side all other races. Not a bad place to grow up in...as I did.

The OP gives ONE example of ONE foolish person....NOT a representation of the other 39 million black folk in America.
 
Why are urban settings more dangerous? Remember the "gangs of New York"? The Mick and Dago gangs murdering each other? What was the solution there?

Get out. Like I did.
Actually in J.D. Vance’s Hillbilly Eligy he talks about how urban centers have historically been far more crime ridden than rural settings even back in the 18th century. It’s just the nature of the beast I guess.
 
Last edited:
:palm: Oh Lord, this old David Duke/StormFront/KKK chestnut again?

I grew up watching b/w reruns of the old "Dead End Kids" and "East Side Kids/Bowery Boys". Hollywood dealing with the REALITY of poor folk living in urban settings. Cagney, Bogart, Robinson....all had movies portraying poor folk living in crime ridden urban neighborhoods were organized crime (gangsters, MAFIA) were a part of life.

Things got somewhat better, but when black folk started moving in, you had the "white flight" to the suburbs. So now black folk contend with the same conditions (low employment, caste system politics, zoning of wealthy, middle, working poor & poor folk) that white folk did. And jokers like you pretend no white folk in urban areas never commit any type of crime. When that BS is debunked, then the old stat game comes out. Of course, the fact that a mere fraction of 1% of the black population on any level are responsible for the crimes carries no weight. But, apply your logic when it comes to say rape and white crime stats, and you jokers dance like a chicken on a hot plate.

Now having put your first sentence to rest. Let's move onto the second and third.

Agreed, BUT it depends on where you live. A couple I knew from Kentucky came from a small town....they told me tales of how tough that town was that would have your hair stand on end. They as with 100% of the town were caucasians of European descent.

As for the suburbs, yes....less crime, crowding, air pollution. I live in the suburbs of NYC....as do a lot of black folk....living along side all other races. Not a bad place to grow up in...as I did.

The OP gives ONE example of ONE foolish person....NOT a representation of the other 39 million black folk in America.

Get out. Like I did.
:cheers:
 
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
Oh Lord, this old David Duke/StormFront/KKK chestnut again?

I grew up watching b/w reruns of the old "Dead End Kids" and "East Side Kids/Bowery Boys". Hollywood dealing with the REALITY of poor folk living in urban settings. Cagney, Bogart, Robinson....all had movies portraying poor folk living in crime ridden urban neighborhoods were organized crime (gangsters, MAFIA) were a part of life.

Things got somewhat better, but when black folk started moving in, you had the "white flight" to the suburbs. So now black folk contend with the same conditions (low employment, caste system politics, zoning of wealthy, middle, working poor & poor folk) that white folk did. And jokers like you pretend no white folk in urban areas never commit any type of crime. When that BS is debunked, then the old stat game comes out. Of course, the fact that a mere fraction of 1% of the black population on any level are responsible for the crimes carries no weight. But, apply your logic when it comes to say rape and white crime stats, and you jokers dance like a chicken on a hot plate.

Now having put your first sentence to rest. Let's move onto the second and third.

Agreed, BUT it depends on where you live. A couple I knew from Kentucky came from a small town....they told me tales of how tough that town was that would have your hair stand on end. They as with 100% of the town were caucasians of European descent.

As for the suburbs, yes....less crime, crowding, air pollution. I live in the suburbs of NYC....as do a lot of black folk....living along side all other races. Not a bad place to grow up in...as I did.

The OP gives ONE example of ONE foolish person....NOT a representation of the other 39 million black folk in America.

Quote Originally Posted by anonymoose View Post
Get out. Like I did.



:cheers:

translation: another racist troll trope put to rest with simple logic and historical facts. But rather than concede the point, this MAGA mook confesses to the very "white flight" I previously described, then tries to be condescending....as if racist BS like his is something to be proud about. Sad.
 
translation: another racist troll trope put to rest with simple logic and historical facts. But rather than concede the point, this MAGA mook confesses to the very "white flight" I previously described, then tries to be condescending....as if racist BS like his is something to be proud about. Sad.
So if an urban lifestyle is so appealing why did you follow the white flight to the burbs?
 
Get out. Like I did.

Actually in J.D. Vance’s Hillbilly Eligy he talks about how urban centers have historically been far more crime ridden than rural settings even back in the 18th century. It’s just the nature of the beast I guess.

Running is a good individual solution, but not a social solution.

Agreed on "the nature of the beast" to an extent. Human nature being what it is, but understanding why people behave that way in urban settings allows the option of mitigating the problems.
 
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
translation: another racist troll trope put to rest with simple logic and historical facts. But rather than concede the point, this MAGA mook confesses to the very "white flight" I previously described, then tries to be condescending....as if racist BS like his is something to be proud about. Sad.



So if an urban lifestyle is so appealing why did you follow the white flight to the burbs?

My mom grew up around farm country in North Carolina, but her family relocated to Brooklyn when she was in junior high....my pop grew up in the Bronx then Brooklyn. The Long Island suburbs was the compromise, as she wanted the kids to grow up in an area similar to what she knew and were about a 40 minute or less drive from Brooklyn.

The rest of the relations stayed in "the city" because they like it and couldn't see paying the suburban taxes.

We didn't move to the burbs until the my kid brother was born in 1966...I was born in 1958, the middle brother born in 1961...white flight was from 1940 -1970 according to historians.

So it wan't about "following" anyone...black folk do make some choices that doesn't include worrying about people like you or what you think, ya know. Hope this answers your question.
 
Back
Top